21 Replies to “We Are All Treaty People”

  1. Wonderful. Could this be the straw that breaks the camel’s back? Might the property owners take up arms to defend what is theirs? Naah, this is Canada, the coward sheep will bend over, take it and apologize on their way off what was their land. Shithole.

  2. So, BC is committed to upholding the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, hence the courts decision is predicated on aboriginal rights. Civilization looses again.

    1. Definitely a side benefit. The indigenous will get the gay treatment. To quote the supreme leader of Iran “we don’t have that problem here”.

      “I’m entitled to……BANG! Next?

  3. This has been ticking in the background for decades….the ticking became louder when leftists joined the fray without realizing just what they may have unleashed. I have heard of areas in BC where people built cabins on leased “Indian land” and when the Indians breached the terms of the land lease and wanted to essentially take the cabins that had been built, the lessees burned the cabins to the ground.

  4. At least you can resist the theft of your paid for property with your confiscated firearms.

    Oops. Never mind.

    Question: Do you have to keep a lock on your bow when transporting it in your vehicle?

  5. This will end up at the SCOC.
    If they allow this to stand, it’s important to understand that almost all of tier 2 Canada was with similar of settlement at some point in the past few hundred years. Not real settlement, but it may be good enough for the SCOC. If the court is accepting settlements from 120 years ago, then they’ll accept 160 years ago… and it’s easy to see where this will end up. So about ya’ll turning in your small arms… it’s probably not a good idea.

    1. This all began with the SCOC and their Delgamuukw ruling. The SCOC invented the notion of aboriginal title for a people who had no word for property ownership and whose idea of property occupation was from the spoils of genocide and slave taking. If they are successful in upholding and extending it across the deranged dominion, we can get back to those kind of real estate transactions again as we will all be living under Indian rule of the Chiefs of the 1% that lived entirely off the former taxpayers. Looking forward to the revolution.

    1. Yes. BC belonged unequivocally to the natives – as you find them, conflicting and overlapping claims and all – until the British established the BC colonies which in 1867 were merged into the one BC. The expectation was that the BC colonies would make the necessary arrangements for the transfer of full sovereignty, and when the united colony was admitted into Confederation, it was on the basis that this had in fact been done and the Crown was sovereign in the entire territory. It was in Pierre Trudeau’s time that Canada took the position that sovereignty had not passed, and the opportunites for grift and graft were thus wide open. I’m in no position to tell you where the truth actually lies. But since you ask, I don’t believe the Liberals for an instant.

Leave a Reply

Navigation