25 Replies to “We Are All Treaty People”

  1. Wonderful. Could this be the straw that breaks the camel’s back? Might the property owners take up arms to defend what is theirs? Naah, this is Canada, the coward sheep will bend over, take it and apologize on their way off what was their land. Shithole.

  2. So, BC is committed to upholding the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, hence the courts decision is predicated on aboriginal rights. Civilization looses again.

  3. When the Muslim or Chinese take control of Canada’s bureaucracy, they won’t play these silly games with the natives.

    1. Definitely a side benefit. The indigenous will get the gay treatment. To quote the supreme leader of Iran “we don’t have that problem here”.

      “I’m entitled to……BANG! Next?

  4. Well, property rights are not in the charter or the constitution. I wonder if that omission applies to the Cowichan as well?

    1. The Charter?? OMFG Trudeau the elder’s joke piece of scrap paper proved as such by his wretched spawn.

  5. This has been ticking in the background for decades….the ticking became louder when leftists joined the fray without realizing just what they may have unleashed. I have heard of areas in BC where people built cabins on leased “Indian land” and when the Indians breached the terms of the land lease and wanted to essentially take the cabins that had been built, the lessees burned the cabins to the ground.

  6. At least you can resist the theft of your paid for property with your confiscated firearms.

    Oops. Never mind.

    Question: Do you have to keep a lock on your bow when transporting it in your vehicle?

      1. Thanks for clearing that up. Plastic fletching is probably outlawed as well, as a product derived from planet-killing oil and gas.

  8. You can bet your last Canuck Buck (=71centsUS). That Dave Eby’s landownings are just outside any
    Indigenous claims.

  9. This will end up at the SCOC.
    If they allow this to stand, it’s important to understand that almost all of tier 2 Canada was with similar of settlement at some point in the past few hundred years. Not real settlement, but it may be good enough for the SCOC. If the court is accepting settlements from 120 years ago, then they’ll accept 160 years ago… and it’s easy to see where this will end up. So about ya’ll turning in your small arms… it’s probably not a good idea.

    1. This all began with the SCOC and their Delgamuukw ruling. The SCOC invented the notion of aboriginal title for a people who had no word for property ownership and whose idea of property occupation was from the spoils of genocide and slave taking. If they are successful in upholding and extending it across the deranged dominion, we can get back to those kind of real estate transactions again as we will all be living under Indian rule of the Chiefs of the 1% that lived entirely off the former taxpayers. Looking forward to the revolution.

      1. If first nation tribes took ownership of the land via tribal wars, are not more recent colonizers entitled to take it by similar actions?

        1. The land belongs to whoever can hold it, either by force or by government-judicial sanction.

  10. The SCOC will do whatever it is told to do by the “Party”. We are not subject to the rule of law, we are subject to the rule of Libranos.

    1. Yes. BC belonged unequivocally to the natives – as you find them, conflicting and overlapping claims and all – until the British established the BC colonies which in 1867 were merged into the one BC. The expectation was that the BC colonies would make the necessary arrangements for the transfer of full sovereignty, and when the united colony was admitted into Confederation, it was on the basis that this had in fact been done and the Crown was sovereign in the entire territory. It was in Pierre Trudeau’s time that Canada took the position that sovereignty had not passed, and the opportunites for grift and graft were thus wide open. I’m in no position to tell you where the truth actually lies. But since you ask, I don’t believe the Liberals for an instant.

    1. It’s not a “god”, it’s an “island”. Would we worship an island? Do we look like pagans to you? Harrumph.

  13. Without property rights, as planned, you own nothing.
    You may have paid for that pitch fork but the Liberal Party of Canada owns it,
    so let’s throw/form a Pitch Fork Party
    and they can catch back all their garden utensils.

  14. FILTHY LIBERALS
    “Property Rights” are in the Constitution
    Section 92(13) of the Constitution Act, 1867: This is the specific legal source that assigns the jurisdiction over “Property and Civil Rights in the Province” exclusively to provincial legislatures.

    FILTHY LIBERAL Lawyers and Judges change the meaning to mean “Property”, and Civil Rights, separately.
    It truly means Property RIGHTS, AND CIVIL RIGHTS.

    If I told you to go to the Store and get me some Boys and Girls Clothing, would you bring back some Human “Boys” & Girls Clothing?, or would you bring Boys clothing and girls clothing? of course you’d bring the clothes, not the Boys.

    Check for your Crown Land Patent. This is your original Real Estate Deal with the crown. Fully enforceable and ignored by Townships.
    All of you would make terrible Lawyers. Me too
    FILTHY LIBERALS

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation