15 Replies to “Science!”

    1. Scientia (Latin) a (mere) way of knowing.
      Scientific ways of knowing have obviously been enlightening and beneficial, as well as being dark and malevolent.
      That said, the topic of this “prostate” thread has nothing to do with science. or faith, or anything that is good, true, and beautiful,
      Excuse my extrapolation, and have a good night.

  3. I just became a member of that club that no man wants to join and am awaiting treatment. I am not f###ing amused by this use of research dollars and time.

    RNrn

  4. The prostate gland lies just above the colon. What goes up there probably has some effect on the incidence of such cancers, but who would risk reporting a link?

  5. ?
    how does prostate and women wind up in the same sentence?
    whats that? whole bunch of ‘catching up with the new narrative elsewhere’ to do?
    oh what a tangled web etc

  6. LMAO…it’s a conundrum. How do these girls keep getting prostate cancer?

    BTW…we’re coming up on Transgender Day (Oct. 31st) when a bunch of attention starved nut cases put on a costume and pretend to be something they’re not.

  8. 1.3 % of them are trannies.
    this could be a good thing seeing as when one gets stuff chemically neutralized or lopped off, no more progeny for you. a small step in population control n’est-ce pas?

    1. Actually, conditions in which chromosomal sex is inconsistent with phenotypic sex, or in which the phenotype is not classifiable as either male or female, occur in 0.018% of the population. The rest are mentally ill or the result of social contagion.

  9. Fauci’s Fairy Tales, revisited.
    Women don’t have a prostate and cannot therefore contract prostate cancer.
    The End.

    BTW, I expect a letter of thanks from Greenpeace for the remarkable work I just performed and the associated savings in ink, paper and reduction of associated greenhouse gas emissions.

Leave a Reply

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation