Blood and treasure. Yours not his.
Toronto Star- In Kyiv, Carney not ruling out Canadian troops in Ukraine if peace deal reached
The prime minister also outlined details of a $2-billion military aid package for Ukraine.
Blood and treasure. Yours not his.
Toronto Star- In Kyiv, Carney not ruling out Canadian troops in Ukraine if peace deal reached
The prime minister also outlined details of a $2-billion military aid package for Ukraine.
Words matter, destroy Cdn military.
on the topic of Cdn snipers, l recollected a story about them
https://macleans.ca/news/canada/we-were-abandoned/
this is whut Canaduh does to our best of the best. raked over the coals, pilloried, blamed and ultimately ignored.
look at the date. see what the good kind of autism does? an encyclopedic memory. if not a small library. aka l just needed to do an online search knowing the details wd be there.
l detest this nation putting the good ones in a sausage maker. did ya hear that Canaduh? no maple leaf flag on the front of the house july 1 and despite 17 of 19 markers in the latest comprehensive blood test AND universal donor O+ l long ago yanked my name of the organ donor registry.
‘f’ you bureaucraps and pollllitiSHUNS. ‘cant take it with you’? to quote the TURDeau 1.0 that YOU worshipped “watch me”
etc etc
What troops? A platoon maybe! 2 Billion dollars! Ukrainian’s Swiss bankers are all in a tizzy over this announcement.
Break out the visa cards for the paint for the uniforms, and the US helmets guys (‘n gals.) Looks like another foreign trip!
A fellow can’t be too careful when fighting for one’s country, wait! One’s country…?
What $2billion, either?
Was thinking that too.
Where are these troops coming from?
Perhaps re-title…
Your blood, his treasure.
Yup.
Mark Carney was able to visit Kiev only because the Canadian government asked for, and received, permission to do so from the Russian government. The Russian government has also made clear that no Western militaries will be allowed in Ukraine as part of any peace settlement. Carney like other Western leaders bases his Ukraine policy on magical, delusional thinking. Any Canadian soldiers crossing into Ukraine will most likely end up as a bloody smear on the ground.
I must admit, you sound quite formidable… almost as much as the radio operator from the Moskva cruiser.
Do you need to be told where to go or are you already aware of the direction?
Since you deflected from my point with a personal insult – I will ask one more question: do you honestly believe that Carney would go anywhere near Kiev if there was even the slightest chance that he might be exposed to a Russian drone of missile attack?
Before we go any further, why would anyone take a reference to the hapless Moskva cruiser as a “personal insult” unless that person was Russian grieving the pathetic state of their endless sitcom of a Navy?
1.7 Million Ukes dead.
8 Million displaced to the west.
5 Million escaped to Russia.
Ukes kidnapping women and children to serve in uniform.
Plenty of permanently lost territory.
Read the writing on the wall.
Take the L.
Source for the above: the voices in your head, right?
DCH
… CORRECT. The Russians via Putin , Lavrov and others have firmly stated that any “peace keepers” .. ANY … will be immediately targeted.
Given the intense level of conflict (drones , missiles ,artillery , glide bombs) , for which the Canadian Military has ZERO experience , sending “peace keepers” …aka. (Canadian troops to fight in Ukriane) would be result in a blood bath.
Carney is merely taking orders from his masters in “The City of London” ( not London UK) to bolster the EU “Coalition of the Willing” .
Yes well, this announcement was for domestic consumption to demonstrate he did something on this trip.
The caveat is “not ruling it out”
Ok
So who suggested it?
I hear he’s visiting Latvia on this trip, probably to tell our troops there – “Hey boys, I’ve got a great new spot for you to move to this fall…”.
RNrn
And where is parliament in all this?
Trade tariffs, billions given away, potential troop decisions, giving control of Canada to the WHO whenever the WHO decides there is an “emergency,” overturning parliament’s previous decree on Hamas by recognizing terrorists….the list goes on.
One man rule.
It must be good to be King.
No wonder parliament has been either prorogued or in recess for most of 2025.
It’s such a bother and inconvenience. Interferes with one man rule, donchaknow.
I’m sure our media and academics and courts will call him out on this abrogation of parliamentary democracy.
Right?
Any peace treaty would carry the possibility of Putin attempting another future annexation of Ukraine. His long-term goals will never change.
One permanent solution is Ukraine joining NATO, but Putin would likely demand that be disallowed as part of the treaty.
There won’t be any peace treaty in the foreseeable future; it’s all delusions in which only the feral fauna of this abandoned Island of Doctor Moreau could possibly believe.
Well then the war will continue. It really is none of our business.
“Well then the war will continue. It really is none of our business.”
Yup. Ukraine can either give up the Donbas and keep the rest or lose it all (along with a few hundred thousand more lives). Not really a tough choice, since no military defeat of Russia is possible without NATO troops on the ground fighting *and dying* in Ukraine.
Why not. Hell … if the Ukrainians are conceding the Donbas ”land swap” (a focus group tested term meaning – LOST THE WAR) … what’s to keep the CIA and Ukrainian dead from conceding the whole place?
Come on Ukraine! Come on Europe, Canada, and the rest of yous … keep fighting that mean old heteronormative Putin! If it takes the total destruction of Ukraine … to STOP Putin? Well … meh. … no skin off the CIA’s back.
Fine example of a caveman logic above. The reality, however, is a lot more complex than a Flintstone from 20000 BC could possibly fathom, e. g. giving up Donbas does not in any way guarantee that Russia will not attempt to take more of Ukraine and, as long as the war continues the way it went for the past 2 years, “losing it all” (i. e. Russia taking over the entire Ukraine) isn’t feasible (remember how much of the Ukrainian land they managed occupy for the past year of war?)
The caveman’s parrot arrived, now let’s wait for the doggie.
Surely we all agree that it doesn’t matter what happens to Ukraine? Even the Ukrainian patriots here want the Ukraine to die. They just want to die gloriously. So, let them. What’s it to us?
“Any peace treaty would carry the possibility of Putin attempting another future annexation of Ukraine.”
And no peace treaty practically *guarantees* that Putin takes the entire country….which do you prefer? What do you think the Ukranians would prefer?
Trump has had enough of Zelensky’s games.
“One permanent solution is Ukraine joining NATO”
Impossible with the corruption level that they have.
> And no peace treaty practically *guarantees* that Putin takes the entire country….
For that, he would need to live for 80 more years and find another 8000000 troops for suicidal attacks on Ukrainian positions. Not to mention the enormous quantities of bombs, artillery shells and other ammunition (probably more than was ever produces in the history of this world). What exactly guarantees do you have for that, Flinny?
Russia isn’t annexing the rest of Ukraine, unless provoked.
Minsk accord violated. Kamalala ding Dong promises Ukraine admission to Ukraine, INVADED 4 days later.
Provocation.
He’s not invading Europe either, unilaterally. Though if the Eurodunces are stupid enough to place their troops in Ukraine, they deserve the glassy retribution.
“Russia isn’t annexing the rest of Ukraine, unless provoked.”
It’s true, that wasn’t his original intent…he doesn’t need all of Ukraine, just the Donbas area.
Putin learned his lesson about trusting Ukraine and NATO after the Minsk fiasco. But the thing about a war of attrition is that it accelerates once the losing side is weakened to the point where they can no longer match the winning side man-for-man, unless the winning side *chooses* to slow their advance. With Ukraine now conscripting 60-year-olds, that situation is not far away.
That said, Zelensky has already proven that he does not want peace (the Azovs will probably kill him if he tries) . Donald Trump should walk away now, I think.
“He’s not invading Europe either, unilaterally.”
Agreed. The same people who claim that he is trying to rebuild the USSR and “we must stop him now!” are also the ones who ridicule him for not being able to take Ukraine. Pick a position and stick to it, kids…
L – Canada needs a military and police dedicated and functional to defend Canada, as nation-state, with its foundational values and culture! The Liberals under Trudeau have undermined the integrity of this nation-state molding it to be part of a globalist, fascist empire fantasyland.
No country in NATO Europe has a viable armed forces capable of even defending itself, not even against the ragtag army of hostile imported by the globalist fascist cabal running the E.U. for the last 20 plus years. The possible exception is Poland. The M.B. controlled Turkey seeking a return to a globalist Islamist Caliphate. It has the largest armed forces in the area is a wild card, to say the least.
The Eurocrats de-industrialized to save the planet, so could not even manufacture sufficient military equipment to create a viable expeditionary armed force. Also, having de-mascculinized their societies, they are hooped, until that is reversed. The low-level civil war is a test to see if the nation within the nation-states of the U.K. and Europe can be revived.
Of course, should P.M. Carney conscript the hostile imports. His targets will be Alberta, Saskatchewan and anywhere in rural Canada, that still believes in a free and democratic society.
The latter would rather focus on fortress North America(NORAD).
After the convoy, the last thing many want to see is a Nation-state force from coast to coast.
The Liberals have already shown what they think of the normies when they have a peaceful mass protest.
Anyone have full trust in the Queen’s cowboys having OUR best interests at heart? Yeah, didn’t think so.
As for sending troops to the Ukes (spit), as long as it’s the Ottawa HQ paper pushers. They’re expendable.
#Lieberals think soldiers exist to give them a backdrop for photo-ops. Military casualties also make for great press. Military -victories- though, those are bad. Guys get put on charge for winning too hard.
I hope the tier 2 Gov’t of Canada and #Libranos blame AB/Sask. for separating when they realize in June of 2026 that the reason their currency is cratering is because of us saying “we’ve had enough of your shit”
and nothing to do with sending troops to peacekeep in Ukraine, or sending $Billions to Africa to teach that sexual deviance is for everyone, and inviting millions of people into Canada who don’t know how to add value to anything Canada is needing, and be given $80k a year to live in hotels, all the while trying to survive with an IQ of 78 in a society of IQ 100’s where half of the citizenry here prior to this can’t figure out how to do the basics either with their garbage public education.
Good luck Canada, don’t call me, I scarcely care enough to give directions to the nearest gas station.
Libs are fond of big announcements but inadequate delivery. How much of previously promised aid (~$20B?) has really been delivered and how much has gone into personal bank accounts, here and Ukraine?
Next, if the peace talks hosted by the US and including the EU, Ukraine and Russia, but not Canada, are successful does the aid come back or get redirected as usual?
Not that I don’t trust our betters…….
Why not eh! A bankrupt welfare state that can’t defend its own borders post troops in a “potentially” former war zone to pretend to keep the peace. I guess we’re back to the LPC “peacekeeper’s” role. Maybe the Ruskies could supply us with 155mm ordnance. Meanwhile we keep importing retrogrades that bring their own form of government with them and put them up on the taxpayer dime and increase regulations to increase housing that, due to existing regulatory hell won’t build to meet. Does anyone else see the Carney effect here of loud PR commitment based on theoretical outcomes with Ukraine and Palestine. The Spawn has been replaced with a ghoul.
Here’s an idea … just divert all the “newcomer-Canadians” from Punjab straight to Ukraine. It’s a much shorter flight. And those brave, brave, Punjabi fighters are quite formidable and would make the Russian conscripts quake in their worn boots … Right B-2/scar?
Blarney Carney can send in the “Canadian Daughters of International Terrorists” (formerly known as Canadian Girl Guides).
While protesting the US, who wouldn’t let them in in the first place, this terrorist front group could do a lot for Ukraine. Rape would go down over fears of social disease. Both Russian and Ukrainian soldiers would grow weary of IED attacks and would eventually unite over a common enemy.
Sorry, sh1t happens when there’s no reader tips.
https://thepostmillennial.com/canadian-girl-guides-protest-trump-by-suspending-travel-to-us
What military? And funded with what, by whom?
You reduced military spending to 1% of GDP in 2014 (that was your conservative hero Harper by the way although to be fair it hadn’t really ever broken 1.5% for decades and including Afghanistan) and it never came back.
But by all means, join your European friends and go over there; we will not. Have fun.
Meanwhile, Ukraine launches another drone attack on a nuclear power plant. Buy, hey – Canaduh has their back: https://t.me/ForeignAgentIntel/15698
Called it, when The Carney Brought his Circus to Ukraine, he wrote a bunch of checks that Canada can’t cover. Could save a lot of effort and just burn the $2 billion on the house floor, because it would just be wasted otherwise.