Things You’ll Never See On The CBC

CBC Chief Big Screen TV Media 31 Comments

Candice Malcolm (threadrolled);

Meet Jordan Tucker, a former CBC reporter.

This is her own profile picture – note the pride progress CBC logo. It’s too perfect.

Last Spring, Tucker attempted to do what CBC does everyday: push a woke activist agenda and pretend it’s real journalism.

She interviewed Professor Frances Widdowson on April 1, 2024 for a hit piece

But what she didn’t expect is that @FrancesWiddows1 also RECORDED the conversation and posted it on Youtube in July 2025.

Here is a preview of the absolute TRAIN WRECK that unfolded.

31 Replies to “Things You’ll Never See On The CBC”

  1. The annoying vocal fry was enough to make one’s neck hairs stand up. It takes a special kind of low life to work at CBC.

    2. Is it ever f’n sickening, eh. Why do they talk like that? Do they think it’s little-girl-cute or delicate or something? They sound like the last gasps from a ruptured seagull.

        1. Wrong. Tats are not hot, in the least. Knew some girls in the 80’s had a couple, fine. But this doodle-art sleeve tat stuff is crap.

      2. No. When you see that many tats on a girl, it is safe to assume she is A) brain dead and B) hard Lefty.

        Many foolish young women got tattoos when they were popular, apparently not understanding that tats are for -life-. And what looks hot when you’re 22 looks f-in’ retarded when you’re 42. Or 62, something which -none- of them seem to have considered.

        Also she’s SO dumb that even the CBC fired her, which I didn’t think was possible.

        1. Need to introduce you to some MILFs abd GILFs…plenty look fine at 40 and 60. Tats included. 😉

  3. It doesn’t matter. The truth that is. Canada is the wokest country on the planet. So self righteous it is sickening to me. The truth be damned. I don’t give two shytes because we will never be able to undermine the woke agenda or narrative in this country. The eastern Liberal Family Compact rules the roost. That became self evident to me with the results of the last election. The eastern Liberal Family Compact control all the pillars of our democracy due to their population majority over the west: Justice, Press, Academia, Economy, Executive, Government and the House of Clowns. The Conservatives will never form government under PP. He is unelectable. Sad, but that is our reality. The Cons have to elect a highly educated woman of colour as their leader if they ever hope to form government in Canada.

    1. You might end up with Liberal Mole Doug Ford as your PM one day. Liberal Mole John Tory successfully infiltrated the ON PC party and threw the election to the Libs with his last minute religious school gambit. That gave us McGuinty/Wynn and the final ruination of Mike Harris’ common sense Ontario. Looking for an “electable” leader for the CPC literally hands the job to fat Dougie.

      RNrn

    2. The wokism and adherence to belief over fact will be interesting to watch in the separation votes. Will the woke citiots show up?

    3. The wokism and adherence to belief over fact will be interesting to watch in the separation votes. Will the woke citiots show up?

    4. “The Cons have to elect a highly educated woman of colour as their leader if they ever hope to form government in Canada.”

      Leslyn Lewis would be outstanding.

    5. “…The Cons have to elect a highly educated woman of colour as their leader…”

      Yeah, that might work. But I’d settle for a leader that had the courage and honesty to stand up and tell the whole truth on everything from the Wuhan flu to immigration to our loss of freedoms, climate change, economy, etc. etc.

      1. ” But I’d settle for a leader that had the courage and honesty to stand up and tell the whole truth on everything from the Wuhan flu to immigration to our loss of freedoms, climate change, economy, etc. etc.”

        Well said, Jamie. I don’t care what gender or color that person is, as long as they are not *too cowardly* to Canadians the real truth about why we are in the situation we find ourselves in.

  4. No one should speak to a reporter without recording the conversation. If you are a man, record it with video so you have a defense to the harassment charges to follow. A witness may be helpful in certain situations, but a recording is better.

    1. Yup…good plan. And it is always good to see the roaches scramble when the light is shone on them and their little game is exposed.

    2. except in London.
      cops have refused FOUR TIMES to view vids related to criminal offenses committed against me, a formal complaint to the then OIPRD resulted in brusk lip “depends on many factors” but REFUSED to tell me a single one.
      do NOT put your faith in video evidence unless you got 10,000 min to force their hand in court. now when any of them get shot/stabbed/drown/run over l call them up tell them how extraordinarily FUNNY stolen property is and, AND well you know the Karma rest of it.

  5. No words. Stupid question but where have the civil rights lawyers in Canada all gone? Punishing mayor because his wife read a book? Like why isn’t there a huge suit laid out right now against the Premier and the Province of Nova Scotia?

    1. Seriously speaking, it sounded like a high school project.
      Funny she is a FORMER CBC reporter/whatever. Wonder how she got her job!

  7. So why is this”excellent” reporter, X CBC?
    She ,We,It is too perfect,how could CBC have let her/it go?
    Every tax payer should be forced to listen to this exchange..pathetic,arrogant and ignorant..yet she shall dictate the responses of the person she is “interviewing”…?
    Whiney,insecure and pathetic beyond belief.

    CBC ..Constantly Biased Consensus.

  9. The reports of journalism’s death in Canada are not in the least exaggerated. With apologies to Mark Twain.

    6,000? 6,000?

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation