Safe and Effective®

Jeffrey A Tucker: For those new to ACIP who want to know why RFK blew up the entire racket today, you need only watch this clip of a typical meeting.

What’s not captured in this clip this is the third attempt to approve this vaccine. The first 2 were thwarted by the two cardiologists on the ACIP, who weren’t ok with those heart attacks. Conveniently, they had been removed From the committee just in time for this vote

16 Replies to “Safe and Effective®”

  1. Noting the irony of my following question, are most of these people in this video autistic? What a bunch of misfits, not to mention the shocking evilness of it all to approve these injections with no proper studies and an alarming safety signal.

    1. “…are most of these people in this video autistic?”

      Some are, I’m sure. Doctors start out as nerds, right? In the school band, not the football team.

      Mostly they are being very, very careful what they say and how they act, because they know the cameras are rolling. It makes them act funny, because they’re all thinking about how things will play out later in court if the wheels come off.

      1. …and I would assume they have family and friends that have invested heavily in the stocks on their recommendation and insight

  2. Implications of RFK Jr.’s CDC Vaccine Committee Overhaul for the Pharmaceutical Industry
    https://www.pharmtech.com/view/implications-of-rfk-jr-s-cdc-vaccine-committee-overhaul-for-the-pharmaceutical-industry

    Key Takeaways
    ·ACIP overhaul disrupts vaccine approval timelines, posing risks to clinical trial planning, FDA readiness, and seasonal launch strategies.

    ·Regulatory uncertainty from ACIP shake-up may delay vaccine reimbursement and market access, impacting commercial rollout and payer engagement.

    ·ACIP restructuring threatens US alignment with global vaccine policy, potentially undermining international regulatory harmonization and partnerships.

      1. Right? If the committee is hand-picked by the pharma companies, and it is, then is there any point in having one? “Oversight” is a joke. I mean, look at what they approved.

        It’s a very expensive rubber stamp. You could train a monkey to do the same thing for a handful of peanuts.

        1. I see a lot of parallels here with Canada’s CRTC and the Rogers/Bell/Verizon oligopoly.

  3. Not being a scientologist, the talk seems to be tentative, not really to the point.
    What’s with the uniformed women?
    It appears as though they have no idea what the concoction does.
    But, but, but, they went to school for a long time and have the lingo gymnastics down.
    One commenter on the x described it as “airy”.
    If it is anything, it is airy, a lot and a lot of windy talk with a lot of holes.

    1. Hi Vito, the USA has the US Public Health Service Commissioned Corps (USPHS) which is headed by the Deputy Surgeon General. The USPHS was created along military lines after the Civil War so they have naval ranks and wear naval uniforms. According to the website there are 6,500 officers dedicated to “communicating the best available scientific information to advance the health of the nation”.

      Regarding the video, who needs horror movies anymore when you have video of expert committees? “We have no data” “slight reservation…. that myocardial infarction signal” but we’ll all vote to approve it and maybe we’ll “look at the post marketing data carefully”.

      It’s no wonder so many drugs have been recalled if the approval process is this careless.

  4. They seem remarkably certain of what they’re advocating, while they skip around the “we have no data one way or the other” … like they know their role here and going through the motions.

    Juxtapose their certainty with the US general ban on Kinder Surprise Eggs, the chocolates with “surprise” toy inside which may cause a choking hazard for children.
    These gov’t agents, especially those with enough gall to actually wear military dress jackets with ribbon devices as if they’re actually significant to what they’re advocating for…

  5. Everybody in that room
    A) knows how much money is at stake, and
    B) is being paid a sh1tlocker full out of the proceeds.

    The guy at the end who has reservations about the “myocarditis signal” is talking about the people they ALREADY KNOW had heart complications from the jab. He’s taking particular care to cover his @$$ in case something bad might happen. You know, like what did happen. Heart attacks, strokes, death, blood clots, all kinds of interesting unexpected events.

    Of particular note, they voted YES after hearing that fool of a woman admit that they had NO DATA regarding interactions with other (actual) vaccines, AND hearing that in Europe physicians do -not- give more than one “adjuvanted vaccine” on the same visit. Because it’s dangerous. Stuff interacts sometimes.

    So anybody who thinks “The Government” has their best interests at heart is dreaming in technicolour. That’s a room full of people who bloody well know better, going along with the gag because they know which side their bread is buttered on. Half of those f-ers probably didn’t even read the handouts.

  6. To be clear, this meeting was in 2018 and is regarding a Hep B vaccine, not “the jab” for the Chinese manufactured covid. I mention this as “the jab” has come to be known for the covid jab, while with some folks they’re all of the same menace.
    I think “some” vaccines may be helpful, while others will certainly change the course of mankind (for the worse). I’ve never had smallpox, or polio, both are life changing events, but those are 2 of the current crop of +80 vaccines given to little people these days for illnesses which are largely contained or not life threatening.
    My newborn granddaughter remains on board with her humanity intact. I *never* worry for her mom and her decisions, Brooke’s abundance of common sense and goodness in all things is unparalleled.

  7. Post marketing data. Is that the same type of data that Pfizer wanted sealed for 75 years? The same Pfizer data that was revealed by Court order and contains 8 pages of “Adverse Events”.

  8. Um, ah, um …. um …. um
    Almost as much as Marx Carnage.
    Excessive umming is an indicator of BIG lying.
    Also, have we noticed the increased use of the teen-girl invented sentence opening of ‘so’.

  9. “Post-marketing surveillance” … ???

    What an odd choice of words for an EMERGENCY medication. Marketing? So the entire “vaccine” was a SALES job? Oh well … Dr. Birx promised “granular data” … so I’m sure we got plenty of her “Post marketing granular data” … Right?

Navigation