39 Replies to “Open Thread On The French Leaders Debate”

    2. This guys has a lot of flags in his profile but none of them are Canadians, so screw him.

  3. Ah uh uhm … in terms of the … well … we support the right of ALL Canadians to identify as whatever … you know … you be you … they want to be. So, yes, your 12yo daughter will still have to shower next to a perverted, mentally ill 40yo man who identifies as your daughters BFF.

  4. We… uhm … we … uhm … we …

    There are two year olds who can speak more intelligently than Carnage.

  5. I did not realize Carney is just slightly taller than a midget. Where are the real men in Liberal politics?

  6. evasive evasive evasive WELL GO AHEAD LADIES TAKE YOUR PICK because this could be the deciding factor. and when the neighborhood RSO (google it) does ‘her’ thing according to expressed RIGHTS and shows up (and shows off!!) in your pre-teen child’s (what gender do they claim??) local athletic facility, be aware, *I* will invoke *my* RIGHT to nya nya nya right in yer face

  7. Don Carnelone, on bended knee, I most humbly offer congratulations on your magnificent debate, and, although I am not worthy, pray may I kiss your ring?… votre bague? … both cheeks of yer right honourable and most virtuous arse? … as I beg you to remember me when dispensing the endless largess from the national horn of plenty…

    1. Hahaha. I didn’t know there were 2 debates tonite. On the one I saw Carnage was terrible. Speaks just like his buddy Juthtin…. umm errr ummm ahhh
      Had nothing to defend the past 10 years of Librano rule of say why he would be any better.

  9. It’s all meaningless theater to give the peasants the impression that politicians care what they think and that their vote matters. I’m not going to dignify it by taking part.

  10. “This is Canada right…?”
    It was difficult for him, but he did, eventually, get that bit right…..

    2. Peter – of course they did. They probably said Biden won the Trump debate. If wishes were bus passes then everyone from CBC could get to work every day.

  13. An anglo viewer will be subconsciously affected by voices of the interpreters.

    Carney’s translator was professional and neutral. Context: “listen to the expert”

    Blanchet’s voice was accented (‘he’s a foreigner’)

    Singh had a voice of a gender-obscure teenager or 20-something. “not ready”

    Poilievre’s voice was also a bit “off.” (having trouble following this guy)

    I wonder if any of that was pre-arranged by Librano overseers?

    1. No reason exists to trust any Liberal racist Party government department, commission, agency, or politician. So there’s probably no reason to wonder if it’s curated bull$hit.

    1. It took place in the capitol, Beijing, but it wasn’t televised and there was no reason for these clowns to be there.

    3. That debate will be in coffee shops in Richmond, B.C. and similar enclaves across the country. Thank god that we have secret ballots.

  15. Is anyone naive enough to believe that this debate format was fair and balanced?
    Anyway, about Carnage…
    To me, at least, someone who “ahhs,” “Ummms,” and “errs” as often as Carnage does, is someone who is struggling to tell a lie convincing enough so that the plebs in the media are able to spin it to something that resembles the truth.

    So no, I didn’t watch the french debate. To me, it would have been a complete waste of time. I may not even bother watching tomorrow’s english debate for the same reason, also because my feeling that this election has been pre-determined is growing stronger as we get closer to the actual election date.

    –the REAL fc.

  16. Rather odd that the alt-right media would get in but not the alt-right political leader?

    Bernier was probably disqualified because he had failed to praise a Liberal policy at any point in his political career. Or some guff about 90% of ridings nominated, or 5% in the polls, or … they just didn’t want a clear alternative exposed.

    I couldn’t care less if the Greens are there or not but I suppose the principle of the thing is that a leaders’ debate should be for all leaders, or no leaders. How does some quasi-government agency get the right to determine who shall or shall not be heard?

    By the way, as self-appointed Chief Rhino, I am available for tomorrow night, the tusk was never greater and I would really like to discuss my core policies, as expressed in this catchy rhi-me …

    We’ll double the price of gas, and kick American ass,

    we’ll trade with who we please, and find out who’s the squeeze,

    we’ll fix the weather good, and we’ll chop down all the wood,

    rhino, rhino, make the dullness end,

    rhino, rhino, chaos is your friend.

    1. I want to hear the opinions and policies of the people with achance to win.

      Thr also rans like Bernier or May. Or the other dozen party leaders in the election noone talks about…. Just serve to take up time and prevent us from hearing about the platforms of the more important leaders who will affect our lives the next 4 years.

      I am not sure at sub 10% if it was worth having the ndp there either. Atleast Blanchets 7 or 8 is from a small enough region that he will have 20 or 30 seats. The ndp isn’t likely to even hold the balance in a minority at this point.

      I think we need more debates. Let’s have a half dozen that vary the participants, never more than 4.

      .But in the main debate. The one that will affect us the most. Let’s limit the participants to people gonna win more than 80 seats. And hear the people that are going to govern. Not let them hide behind other people talking.

      1. “I want to hear the opinions and policies of the people with a chance to win.”

        Same here.

        “The also rans like Bernier or May. Or the other dozen party leaders in the election no one talks about…. Just serve to take up time and prevent us from hearing about the platforms of the more important leaders who will affect our lives the next 4 years.”

        All by design, I’m sure. As much as I would like to see Maxime Bernier in a debate with Poilievre and Carney, at this point he has no business being there; if you include him, you have to include May as well. Blanchet also does not deserve to be there, because he can’t win and be appointed Prime Minister of Canada.

    2. Re: “alt-right media”…really?
      Anyway…Rebel had a struggle involving lawyers in order to be there.
      Love my Rebel peeps…however I don’t like the long drawn out preachy questions. I was screaming at the screen “get to the point!”

  18. The answer to both questions would be a simple yes or no.
    If the candidate starts pablum puking out word salad you know an honest answer would completely deconstruct their narrative that the other guy is guilty of the “ist” or “ism” they use to gas light them with.
    Trudeau could get away with this, the old white guy the liberals decided is what a conservative is to run as Trudeau’s replacement can’t hide behind word salad and having the right last name.
    The support he has is the type of support provided under duress.
    Mr Burns is the best they got.

  19. I don’t give a fig what Carney says, he’s taking over a Liberal mess and has no political experience, he’ll be learning from the masters of lies, the same bunch who directed the mess Trudeau left and piling more onto it.

    It’s beyond the imagination how voters could possibly be stupid enough to reward such incompetence across the board with another term of Office.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation