33 Replies to “America’s Middle Finger?”

  1. This is starting to get very interesting. I wonder how many minions in little Ottawa cubicles are getting their hair up right now over the number of people starting to say things like this.

    I hope it’s a lot. So many that the likes of #CarkMarney and #BlubberDouggie hear about it and feel the cold hand of Reality close on their necks.

    This ain’t the same country it was in 2019, boys. You shot your bolt. We’re all starting to consider options that we wouldn’t have five years ago.

  4. Hmm…100+ acres in SK with a house, detached workshop and pond for under $500k…double that in the bank when I’m done? And 2A rights and $2k property tax? Then a green card and summer home in Texas? That’s a no-brainer there…

  6. If Ontario and Quebec would get equalization money not only from Alberta and Saskatchewan but from Texas, North and South Dakota, Florida and Pennsylvania they would be the first to raise the stars and stripes on their flag poles.

    1. Amen, they are apex grifters, not proud to be Canadian, proud of the deal they have. Offer them a better one and they’re all in.

  7. From today’s press event in Oval Office, it looks like Trump 1) knows A LOT from macro-economics and global trade & strategy 2) is dead-serious about taking Canada. And the more our (ex?)PM & the rest are venting nationalist BS, the more I root for Trump.
    Because Canada is broken beyond repair, and there’s no way any of these Carneys and Jagmeets are gonna solve anything. No snowball chance in hell, as our Right Honourable keeps saying. The difference is HUUGE: it’s obvious that Trump has the wits, experience and guts to do all he said he will while our leaders quarell over how Canada is not gonna buy Bourbon and ban maple syrup.

  8. Maybe this is a good time to revisit a border dispute. East of the Saint John River is mostly liberal voters.

    ‘US Claim to the Saint John River Border
    During the border dispute between the United States and Great Britain, the US claimed that the border between Maine and New Brunswick should be the Saint John River. This claim was based on the Treaty of Paris (1783), which ended the American Revolutionary War and established the boundaries between the US and British North America.

    The US argued that the Saint John River was the natural boundary between Maine and New Brunswick, as it was a major waterway that flowed from the Canadian interior to the Bay of Fundy. The US claim to the Saint John River border would have given the US control of a significant portion of what is now western New Brunswick, including the valley of the Saint John River.’

    And since the courts in New Brunswick are hell bent on squandering our lands to the old Indians, moving the Maine state line to its natural border might be win win.

  10. Based on that picture alone it would be the best secession ever.

    Hell I would vote for Alberta to stay just to hear the Laurentians scream and dive for their fainting couches every time they look at Google maps.

  11. The normalising of AB/Sask. leaving Canada has begun. Sure the eastern Canadians and politicians refer to us as crazy or “unpatriotic” but as people accept the idea, it’ll catch on as quick as a tariff fight

  13. As an Albertan I’m in for leaving the failed nation canada. Normalized or not.
    Just give me independence from those crooks out east and let them pay for their own habits without that yearly massive transfer of cash from me and my neighbors.
    It’s way past time.

  14. I’d move to the state with the largest whitetail and the best waterfowl hunting ever.
    Expect a lot of us from the ROC.

    1. I’d move to a state that’s WARM. I’ve HAD IT with lows into the minus 30s, and windchills taking us down to below the minus 40s for WEEKS…

      Lower taxes, a health care system that works, and warmer weather. Come on, Trump. I’d personally welcome our liberators into my home.

  15. If ever SK and/or AB started talking seriously about joining the USA, either by Statehood, or as a unincorporated territory (like Puerto Rico),,, other provinces would soon be scrambling to get a proposal together too.
    If Saskalta left Canada, who would want to stay behind with ON and QC.

  16. I have no wish to join the states , proud to be from alta . Absolutely sick and tired of supporting idiots in the rest of the country that sneer at us rubes and our oil . They think they can live without it. I would like them to try see how it goes. Personally western separation is a better option .

  18. I just can’t imagine Trump or any American conservative wanting to inject 34 million (or whatever the number is in Canada, it’s a majority) commie votes into their democracy. Most canucks are left of San Francisco voters. There would likely never be another Republican president or congress again.

    Now, Saskaberta is another animal altogether. Total of two Lib seats last election? Or three maybe in the commie parts of Edmonton, Calgary and maybe Regina? Oil, natgas, uranium, coal, potash and most of the commies would likely run back to Toronto etc anyway.

    We get more liberty, lower taxes, and a federal govt that will have been largely de-corrupted by Trump, Musk et al by then. I just don’t see any downside.

    1. I’ll speculate that the taste of freedom will be so refreshing, that once the plebs actually experience what REAL freedom feels like, they’d wake up from their delusion, and ask themselves why we didn’t do this sooner. At least, that’s my hope.
      I have no feeling of patriotism or love of country over what Canada has become (canuckistan). Canada is a dead country to me. We are living in Canuckistan.

    2. If all of Canada voted democrat it would have no more effect than all of CA voting democrat. Area is not population. Big geographically is not big electorally.

      1. -There will not be a return to democrat control for at least 8-12 years. Longer if Trump succeeds in expanding the states and clearing out the deadwood.

    4. Canada or any part thereof would almost certainly be admitted as a territory at first, with no voting representation in Congress nor the right to vote in presidential elections, until such time as Canadian institutional structures had been reformed along American lines, and perhaps also until the current generation of voters had mostly aged out.

      Still a good trade, to be rid of the rotten MON-OTT-TOR elite class that runs Canada as its personal fiefdom.

  20. It will never happen. There are not enough productive and intelligent people here. The two cities are reliably left – little Torontos on the prairies – and too much of the extra-city population could have appeared as case studies in Tommy Douglas’s Master’s thesis. Saskatchewan does not have enough Kates.

    1. I don’t think the U.S.A. wants to absorb Canada for the people, but because the resources and control of the geography for their security would be worth putting up with some Canadians.

      1. True, the US does not want the people. My argument is that the people of SK are not smart enough to vote in favor of joining the US and are not productive enough to make it – or western independence of any sort – work. The smart and productive in SK are greatly outnumbered by the dim and dependent. For every Kate of SDA, there is a Vonda full of, well, Lickmuffins.

    2. There would be huge migration who would flee Saskatchewan for more friendly climates of eastern loonyville. But then again, Conservative Manitobans would probably sink your lifeboat by fleeing the Wab debacle.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation