The Children Are Our Future

Children R Our Future Religion Of Submission Terrorism 50 Comments

And that’s why it’s best you start practicing – ‘Allahu Akbar!’

This religious-inspired evil mayhem has been going on for a long time, centuries really, but the sanitizing accusation of “Islamophobia” as a concept is apparently a French academic’s invention from 1910. It was brought into English usage by Columbia University professor cum Palestinian activist Edward Said in 1985 and took off to the extent that it has been raised every time the moment a Muslim terror act occurs in the decades since 9/11.

Its pervasive adoption by liberal elites is moral narcissism and virtue signaling at their purest and have prevented Western society from seeing its own destruction when its standing in front of them. Europe, as we knew it, is on the edge of extinction.

To be blunt and obvious, the actual source of this problem has nothing to do with a phobia of any sort and stems from a literal reading of key parts of the original texts of a warlike Seventh Century tribalist ideology. Its calls for “jihad” are often excused as “spiritual,” but in reality are anything but. That ideology has not been significantly reformed but is continually being refreshed and enhanced—everywhere on the globe, including right here in the USA.

We see that in a video of what children are being taught at a Islamic school in Philadelphia. They chant in unison: “We will Sacrifice Ourselves for Al-Aqsa; Will Chop off their Heads, Subject Them to Eternal Torture.” There’s more from these tykes if you care to click on it. (Warning: very creepy) Like the New Orleans terrorist, they’re all good “US citizens.”

Needless to say, these children are not taught there were two Jewish Temples standing where their beloved Al-Aqsa now sits, the first one, built by King Solomon roughly sixteen hundred years before the existence of Islam.

Toronto: Party like it’s the year 610.

50 Replies to “The Children Are Our Future”

  1. There’s no question that Islam is an evil, intolerant religion. I imagine it was concocted to make the various populaces who practice it easier to control. And due to their not being a similarly violent and intolerant religion to counter it, variants had to be contrived to turn that energy inwards when required.

    That said, those who believe that there was a “Jewish” temple there (or two) are ignorant of both history and the territory.

    In the case of the temple, it would have been an Israelite temple, not a “Jewish” one, whatever that means.

    As for the region, there isn’t the space available in the area we’re told was the “Temple mount” to build such a place. Neither are the surrounding areas as related to us from the Old Testament present.

    The entire area is an inhospitable desert, made viable for life only through massive continuous inflows of money from western nations. And not only to Israel, but also to its neighbors.

    Those who believe this was the traditional homeland of the children of Israel have either never visited the land, or are too indoctrinated by movies of Moses and the Picture Bible. Both of which implant visuals of what the Old Testament never describes.

    And then there’s the issue of the purposely-mistranslated words of the Old Testament…

      1. What on earth made you believe I am a defender of Islam? Did you read what I wrote?

        Do you believe that if I don’t support Jews (whatever that means) that I therefore support Islam? I most certainly don’t. Nor do I support Palestinians – quite the opposite.

        I have come to believe that much of what we believe about “Jews” has nothing to do with what we have been taught to call the “Old Testament”, but instead what we have been taught to call the “New Testament”. And that the latter is unrelated to the former in the same manner as the Book of Mormon pretends to be related to both.

    3. “In the case of the temple, it would have been an Israelite temple, not a “Jewish” one, whatever that means.”

      Pretty clear what that means – Israelites (who were all Jews) built the temple.

      Also pretty clear – you’re an anti-Semite who advocates genocide against the Jews.

      1. What does Israel have to do with Jews? We’re led to believe that “Jew” is somehow related to the tribe of Judah. Even if true, they would only account for the descendants of one out of twelve tribes, and a smallish one at that.

        The children of Israel built the temple, during the reign of Solomon with materials gathered from his father, David.

        And where do you get the notion that I advocate for the genocide of Jews?

        Wow.

        I don’t even dislike them. I simply stated that I don’t believe they’re related to the children of Israel anymore than I believe in the claims of the Mormons, or any other cult.

        Seriously, some people seem to believe in only black or white, with no other possible viewpoints. And read in whatever’s missing to accommodate their mindset.

        1. Watto making an ethnic purity argument.
          Big surprise.
          Folk can convert to Judaism if they want, doesn’t matter where they’re from or what ethnicity they are, and when they have finished, they are a Jew, and as a Jew are free to adopt Israel as their homeland and claim kinship with other Jews.

          1. No, I am stating that there isn’t a reason to believe that the people who call themselves “Jews” have anything to do with the people spoken about in what we’ve been taught to call the “Old Testament”.

            And I am more than aware of the various definitions of “Jew”. One can convert, be Jewish ethnically, or religiously. One can be Jewish because one’s mother was Jewish. Etc.

            That said, there are a handful of large and unrelated ethnic groups that all claim to be Jewish. That is problematic.

            And yet there are no groups that claim to be from Ephraim, or Manasseh, or Issachar, etc.

            And you are assuming that what we call “Israel” today is related to the Israel of the “Old Testament”. Based on the various descriptions throughout many books, modern Israel does not fit. At all. Not its size, not its geographical location, not its produce, not its landscape, nothing.

            You might be surprised to learn that virtually nothing of the states of the middle east can be found in the “Old Testament”, including Egypt (actually called Mitzraim), Syria (Aram), the Nile river (various common words for “stream” are translated as a sinlge, proper name), etc. And of the ones that do appear, most were only recently named that, such as Jerusalem (Al Quds).

            There has been no shortage of inventions of historical documents, possibly penned within the last two centuries, such as the writings of Josephus. Despite the supposed age of these authors, manuscripts were only recently found. And of course miraculously survived in the worst possible conditions, just when they were needed…

            For all I care, the “Jews” can keep the modern state they call Israel. All I ask is that they don’t ask for billions of our dollars to keep it. As it stands, most Jews require financial incentives to stay in their arid, barren “promised land”, with most preferring to live in Montreal, London, and New York.

          2. “That said, there are a handful of large and unrelated ethnic groups that all claim to be Jewish. That is problematic.”
            Problematic for you, but not for normal folk. As I said, anyone, from any ethnicity can convert to Judaism.

            “And you are assuming that what we call “Israel” today is related to the Israel of the “Old Testament”.”
            Who cares? There exists the nation. It has a location. It is considered the homeland of many Jews. Who the eff are you to say “nuh uh! Well akshally…”
            Your Hitleresque assumption that the origins of a given tribe make a lick of difference is absurd.
            Israel exists like other nations do, by strength of arms, and most of the people who love there are Jews

            “As it stands, most Jews require financial incentives to stay in their arid, barren “promised land”, with most preferring to live in Montreal, London, and New York.”
            Yeah, it was founded in 1948 because of “financial incentives.” Also, more Jews live in Israel than in any of the cities you mention, making you a liar.

          3. The statement I made is problematic for those using logic. Maybe not for those driven by emotion.

            Someone can call a patch of desert “Israel” if they want. I was never claiming there was a copyright to the name – simply pointing out that it isn’t related. And also pointing out that “Jews” don’t appear to be related to the descendants of the Israel recorded in the “Old Testament”. I have no problem if Jews want to live in a desert.

            And if someone states something untrue, that doesn’t make them a liar, per se. They could have been honestly mistaken, for example. But I am not mistaken. There are more Jews living in just the US (>7.5 million – 2020) than in all of Israel (7.1 million), with 15.3 million worldwide.

            According to your logic, that makes you a liar.

  2. Not a mention of the doctrine of abrogation, where later passages (which are more violent) override the passages that were more peaceful, where is there is a conflict between the 2.

  3. Those dancing dudes looked like Indians to me.
    Gay Indians I guess cuz it was a sausage party.

    As for the Jihadi Brigades, I’ll repost this from the Shawn Ryan show with Sarah Adams.
    For those who don’t have the time:
    There are 1000’s of Al Qaeda members in the US and Europe and 2025 is the year they may let loose. Fedayeen who fight to the death and suicide bombers.
    They are free to change targets if a better one shows.
    Bin Laden’s son is alive, stays in the shadows and he keeps Al Qaeda out of the news.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T50pRCNaQCA&t=11s

    1. That Sarah Adams appearance on Shawns show, exposes the snake like behavior of the democrats. This will not be good for the US or probably here as well. Certainly deliberate, and could be massively destructive. for people who havent seen it go watch. Particularly the laast 25 minutes. all the Mo’s are confusing, but she sure knows her field.

    2. In the strange case of Tommy Robinson, Elon Musk has fired a shot across the bow of Keir Starmer. Popcorn Time!

  5. All monotheistic religion is completely delusional, but the Islamic variety is particularly troublesome due to it’s violence. Islam will continue to be a serious problem until we ban it and all adherents from the West. No this is not comparable to Nazi treatment of Jews; they were not at all any security risk to anyone, except in Hitler’s twisted mind. Muslims are quite possibly the worst group since the Nazis.

    1. That may be, but monotheistic religions at least don’t suffer from the illogic of polytheistic religion.

      1. @Watto: “That may be, but monotheistic religions at least don’t suffer from the illogic of polytheistic religion.”

        How so? What makes polytheism “illogical” in your worldview?

          2. A basic question many require an answer to is, “where did we come from?” and another would be “who/what made us?”

            The state attempts to satisfy this question with the theory of evolution. But evolution is simply a jesuitical deception involving chicken-and-egg circles and anti-scientific thinking. It arrives at the conclusions it wishes, and then attempts to justify the result. Every now and then they “prove” a theory through a discovery which is almost always proven to be a forgery afterwards.

            Religion also tries to answer the question, and the major ones are monotheistic. Where more than one god exists, it is only logical to ask which one came first? Even many of the Greek/Roman gods were said to have been birthed by others or came about by supernatural acts.

            The books of what we have been taught to call the “Old Testament” speak of a single god. It is only in the much later books written in a different language (half of which were written by a single man who contradicts much of the other half) that we are introduced to the idea of multiple gods – one of which is only implied. There are two verses that explicitly mention a trinity, but both appear to have been inserted after the fact.

            Upon close examination of the original language of the “Old Testament”, one quickly finds that the supposed “messianic” passages have been tortured to hint at a future “messiah”. This original language is called “Paleo-Hebrew”, but has absolutely no relationship whatsoever with modern “Hebrew”. Even the letters (more properly described as glyphs) are entirely different from the Syriac script of modern “Hebrew”.

            Using consistent phonetics, even the language would be pronounced “Obry” and not “Hebrew”.

    2. @Glenn Geist: That is a sweeping general claim. Can you justify it? Based on what criteria have you decided this?

    3. l made a presentation to a group of christian men, l called it ‘blowing a gaping hole in evolution’, pointing out evolutionists are fond of ‘starting at one end’ yammering about amino acids coming out of an electric spark experiment, and also the other end looking back in the fossil record.

      and have not yet explained how DIRT came to life. l added l like how the Good Book puts it, God formed Adam out of DIRT. and pointed out the authors had no clue about molecular biology or the periodic table but got THAT part right.
      l then talked about the constituent cells, molecules, elements, atoms and nucleii were ALL made out of PROTONS. every one of which some 10E80 to 10E100 are exactly the same, so only need to talk about one of them.
      and the question is, what properties, attributes does ONE proton have to coalesce into everything that has is or will live? plant animal and everything else in between ALL ORGANISMS ALIVE EVER came out of *one* proton. where are the instructions? the DNA kind of building block? where is the programming? where? tell me. hey evolutionist, you got ythe floor lets hear it.

      so far after decades of posing the question just a bunch of crickets . . . . .

  6. Here is how to f**k with Muslims: ask them “Are you Shia, Ismaili, Salafi or Sunni, and why?”

    That will usually stop them in their tracks, and they change the subject.

    If they try to answer, say “wait, you all each have a different Quran?”

    They will say “no, the Quran is perfectly preserved!!! Praise be to Allah!” (BTW, tell them “Yeah, so? The Lord of the Rings is also perfectly preserved. What does that have to do with anything?”).

    So then, ask them: “Well if the Quran is perfectly preserved, and it is THE PERFECT BOOK, how come you all read the same book, but interpret it in so many different ways?” … I thought it was supposed to solve all the interpretation problems between the Jews, Christians, and anamists?

    Islam as a faith system, a philosophy and a theology is shot so full of holes they make the Jehovah’s Witnesses sound coherent!

    By the way, NEVER engage a Muslim on mohammed’s sketchy behaviour. They will claim that as he is the perfect man, who are we to judge? And if you are an atheist you will lose on morality every single time. Every. Single. Time. Remember, unlike Christopher Hitchens’ garbage (mostly just spouting emotional narratives) actual philosophical arguments revolve around presuppositions, the criterion problem, and justification.

    Muslims are pathetically weak on modern actual argumentation (epistemology and metaphysics) … and they all know it. Since we don’t teach that in schools in the West anymore, most Westerners are helpless before Islam’s dirty debate tricks.

    Sign up for philosophy training, and watch them crumble.

    1. I recall getting a haircut in Ottawa a couple decades ago by an Ismaili woman…..she said the Ismailis think the rest of them are nuts.

    3. l wonder does this have anything to do with the fact current most popular boys name
      in Anggland is…….. variations on mohammad.

  7. Civilized history must be taught and boldly asserted by men and women of the west.

    White Christian men of Northern European heritage were the only group of people on the planet to develop concepts of universal human rights and individual freedoms that led to the greatest uplifting of humanity ever known.

    Misery and poverty await those who ignore the teachings of the white man. As if that weren’t obvious.

  8. Nobody needs to waste their time on the nuances of Depraved inbred Koranderthals and their Child Rapist Mo.

    They believe peace will come to them when they convert the entire world or kill them for not converting. The only “innocent” in Islam is them.
    Ban Islam
    Destroy all Mosques
    Exile every single scumbag Muslim from the west.
    FILTHY LIBERALS will disagree.

  10. In order for Europe to save itself in some form (probably already too late) it will have to go full Gaza. It might end in a partition like india/Pakistan. It’s not going to end well.

    1. Europe is lost. Only America can save western culture. Canada is lost but could be pulled out of the fire by Trump.

  11. Islam: Teaches their kids to fight their enemies, and to chop up their enemies.
    The west: Teaches their kids to be gay, and to chop themselves up.

    One of those strategies is viable, I leave it to you to figure out which one.

  13. There is no such thing as “radical’ and “moderate” anyone in a “religion”.

    You either “are”, or “are not” a member. Anyone who truly believes that they are, and calls themselves “moderate” are actually “apostate”. Fully follow the book, or don’t bother, you can’t pick and choose the parts you like, and disregard the parts you don’t. To truly follow, you are “radical”.

    Jesus even says that to the “lukewarm”, neither hot nor cold towards Him, He will spit them out.

    The ones told that it’s okay to lie to non believers, when they say that they are “moderate”, they are actually “radical”, if they are “true” followers.

    1. I agree in the sense that one can’t be “radical” or “moderate” in something like math, for example. One can’t accept division but deny fractals. Or choose to partially accept algebra.

      That said, most Christians don’t believe in what the Bible explicitly says when they don’t want to accept it. There are no shortage of Christians who accept gay marriage, or who are fine with abortion. There are no shortage of Catholics who consider Muslims saved yet would deny the same to Protestants – Jorge Borgoglio amongst them.

      The overwhelming majority of Christians would profess their faith openly in the right circumstances, but most would not meet all but the most lenient definitions of Christian, and would likely surprise their friends and co-workers when they heard about it.

      The same is true with Islam – most are nominally Islamic, but practically atheist. Most Jews know less about Judaism than United Church “Christians” would about their supposed faith.

      In a non-religious context, most “conservatives” are almost anything but – they are simply liberal-lite. And they want it that way. Actual conservatism is repulsive to them.

      1. Perhaps you should start by looking up the difference between fractions and fractals.
        Ye who proclaim that it somehow matters that ancient texts get more or less adulterated over time, and that it somehow matters that the people (all long dead now) referenced in those texts are not the same people as today, and yet cannot properly use words himself. Self-awareness is not your strong suit.

        1. I see. So because I accidentally used “fractal” instead of “fraction”, then my point is null and void.

          Interesting logic you practice.

          1. yw is the resident expert nit picker. l suspect its because he’s covered in them. heyo yawhat, how’s the business of improving legibility on posted photo images going?

  14. Thought I’d stick this in although this probably deserves its own topic.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uexy4RcZR9E

    I don’t for one minute believe that this scandal has only taken place in Britain! The open borders in all western countries and the advocacy of multiculturalism, inclusivity, diversity, and equality have ensured that this conduct of practicing Muslims, whether from India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia or elsewhere is not limited to Britain. The fact that the American authorities have admitted to losing 300,000 children is testament in itself that the “grooming” is happening here in North America.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation