Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
Why do the 1st and 2nd amendments need “saving”? Show me where they are under attack. Show me how signing a petition reverses this.
Who here knew that Kamala is in charge of the White house office of gun violence prevention?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/ogvp/
What part of “shall not be infringed” is unclear?
And she has repeatedly called for the censoring of “fake news” and “Russian interference” online.
Because Democrats are neo-fascists, that’s why.
Cases of government manipulating social media platforms to censor materials contradicting government narratives is an acknowledged FACT, AllanS.
Great to have you back, Alllan. How was your vacation?
something from your hero about ‘blocking’:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/john-kerry-first-amendment-major-block-stopping-disinformation
serious Q: anybody know what drives dypshyts like this ‘allans’?
subsequent Q: is this an example of trolling?
Obviously AL S is one of the ones too lazy to spend 10 seconds searching something as noted in the replies on the Harris is lying topic……….
AllanS has a bit of a problem, in that he ignores inconvenient facts. They’re dismissed outright, just like his claims of courts rejecting petitions against fraudulent elections. He ignores the fact that courts who outright dismisses these cases did so out of “lack of standing,” and never actually heard the evidence.
If memory serves, at least three petitions were successful, but AllanS will not acknowledge that to be the case.
That’s his main character flaw. Otherwise, give credit when it’s due. AllanS does get it right… occasionally… like the stopped clock metaphor.
“He ignores the fact that courts who outright dismisses these cases did so out of “lack of standing,” and never actually heard the evidence.”
But that’s a lie, you projecting liar: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/09/10/donald-trump-2020-election-claims-fact-check/75168089007/
Might want to look at James O’Keefe. Meta engineers confirm any post critical of Kamala is demoted. That is the definition of censorship. As the Twitter files confirmed, the FBI has a group of current and former employees at all of the platforms, coordinating the censorship. You’ve been shown. If you choose to ignore this, it is just partisan tribalism.
No violation of the 1st amendment. Nice try.
AllanS! That’s an absurd rebuttal. Technically, you may be correct, but what you’re saying is that the government thinks it may have found a loophole in the constitution which allows them to blatantly censor opinions it doesn’t like.
But like it or not, AllanS, this censorship is being challenged in court under 1A, so let’s just wait and see, shall we? You may be technically correct… NOW, but that may change.
That’s not a ‘loophole’. You don’t understand how free speech or the 1A works. What a shocker.
Well Trump might win election and he’s a fascist who wants to take away licenses from news networks he doesn’t like.
It worked! Read the article, followed the link and signed the petition. Even if I don’t win a sweet mil (USD), I can rest easy knowing that I did my part to save 1A and 2A!! God Bless America!
turn it into a FREE lottery ticket. BRILLIANT
$1,000,000
thats like what, 5 hours and 16 minutes of profit for Elon?
heh heh heh oooohhh GAWD l love how that man thinks.
Troll level: master of universe.
Haha, Democrats went mad about it, making it big news — and if is not yet clear how the media is biased — this kind of episodes show it plainly.
‘Plan to give $1m per day until November 5 election could violate law against using cash to induce voting, experts say.’
I have no idea about the legality of this, but offering people money for signing a petition is no way the same as buying their vote.
“‘Plan to give $1m per day until November 5 election could violate law against using cash to induce voting, experts say.’”
Ahh, the tried-and-true ‘experts say’ routine. Gotta love it.
“I have no idea about the legality of this, but offering people money for signing a petition is no way the same as buying their vote.”
Perfectly legal, which is the beauty of it. If Mark Zuckerberg didn’t break the law in 2020, Elon Musk isn’t breaking it now.
anybody got a link to the wording of the petition?
l had a url but its blocked outside USA.
great reporting there msm. great reporting there sda.
There’s not much to it. Copied from theamericapac.org petition page
https://petition.theamericapac.org/
“The First and Second Amendments guarantee freedom of speech and the right to bear arms. By signing below, I am pledging my support for the First and Second Amendments.
In appreciation for your support, you will receive $47 for each registered voter you refer that signs this petition.
Our goal is to get 1 million registered voters in swing states to sign in support of the Constitution, especially freedom of speech and the right to bear arms. This program is exclusively open to registered voters in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin and North Carolina. Expires October 21.”
democRATS are upset that they didn’t think of this first.
I’m thinking the democRATS prefer to use the Epstein files to solicit donations.
I have no direct evidence of this, but I’m wondering why the US government doesn’t charge any of the Epstein clients.
But perhaps it’s as simple as democRATS just prefer sex with minors.
There are two 4D chess masters (The Donald and Elon) on the Republican side. As they say, steel sharpens steel.
Shorter post: “He was being retarded on purpose guys!”