110 Replies to “A Disgrace”

  1. Send the crook to jail.

    The jury was agreed to by both defence and prosecution.

    Both sides had the opportunity to call any witness they chose.

    So eat it you little piles.

    1. The jury had limited input from the defence. Challenges are limited. The defence was denied one witness and the judge abused another defence witness. No points for being a dick.

    2. You appear to be more than a little misinformed. Your biases are showing.

    3. You have no clue, obviously. In any event Trump is entitled to appeal, which he will win easily.
      Remember when DeMarxists were so sure Trump could be kept off the CO ballot, reversed 9-0 by SCOTUS.
      Expect SCOTUS to take this up at their earliest opportunity.
      Right now, Americans know this is a Stalinist show trial so not one vote has been affected.
      But DeMarxists could lose many Independents as this sham of a show trial is shown the light of day.
      Notwithstanding more Biden disasters and missteps, his son going on trial in August for actual crimes.
      Americans refuse to elect Biden so must be cajoled, their vote stolen or their candidate nullified.
      Now we see the true danger to democracy from an administration of wars, overrun borders.
      Soon the blowback can begin where Democrats must stay in power to stay out of jail.
      I don’t like their chances, given Biden has already committed crimes.
      Both sides did not the opportunity to call witnesses? Only an idiot believes that, proof of your ignorance
      The judge wouldn’t let the jury hear the law on election law and tagged on two misdemeanors.
      Just remember, when this all goes away, before the election, to paint the word “FASCIST” on your forehead.
      All DeMarxists had to do was ignore Trump and he may have gone away; instead they’ve handed him the WH.
      What a monster miscalculation, not savable by ideological ignoramuses.

    4. Joe Biden regularly showered with his daughter, sniffs/feels up little girls in full view of cameras, swam naked in front of female secret service agents, crapped his pants in front of the pope, and is corrupt as the day is long. Thought you should know.

    5. No both sides were not allowed. Trump was denied witnesses.
      Trump was denied change of venue. From 95% Democrats Manhattan to a 50/50 district.
      Alan Dershowitz, life long Democrat, never once voted Republican, who said he wouldn’t vote for Trump, and Harvard Law professor, and attending the trial, said he in 60 years of court had never seen a more biased judge.

      1. Given it was not televised, only a few can actually attend. I hope you enjoyed your stay in NYC or … don’t tell me … you got your info from legacy media?

    6. Actually, both sides were *not* allowed to call any witness they chose.

      The defense was *not* allowed to call the former head of the Federal Elections Commission to testify. That’s a lie right out of the gate.

      But as get out the vote for Trump, this is a windfall.

      1. Here’s an idea … why call witnesses and mount a defense when no actual crime has been charged … why defend yourself against a sham trial? Defending yourself only legitimizes the entire charade.

        No, just let the higher courts strike down this misuse of the Law, the Courts, Justice, and The Constitution

        1. Kenji, if only people revered and followed the Constitution this crap would not be happening.

    7. The key defence witness was the acknowledged export on campaign law. The biased judge placed so many restrictions on his testimony that it rendered his testimony superfluous. So your contention that both sides had the opportunity to call any witness they chose is simply untrue.

    8. Boy, you really aren’t really aware of what went on in the court, are you? Talk about stupid.

    9. “Both sides had the opportunity to call any witness they chose. ”

      Except for the Elections Commission witness, who would have testified to the fact that there was NO election-related crime committed?

      Nice try.

    10. You must have put a great deal of thought into that talking point and couldn’t wait to post it.
      Feel better now?
      Makes up for all the mean tweets?

      My response is that I agree

      Difference is that the felons are actually the ones that are guilty of federal crimes
      Let’s start with the guy that used his office to pressure a foreign government to stop an investigation.
      The smoking gun?
      “Well son of a bitch, he got fired”

      The other difference
      I’m willing to be patient and let justice come without weaponizing the government and tip the scales.

  2. And to top this kangaroo decision further, Trump’s sentencing is scheduled two days before the start of the Republican convention (FOX news). The fix is in. One hope the U.S. electorate gets angry.

    1. Sentencing date no doubt intentionally chosen for that very reason.

      Next, the RNC can be expected to declare that, primary election results notwithstanding, they shall not nominate a “convicted felon” for the office of POTUS, and declare that they shall nominate someone else, perhaps that snake Haley, instead.

      The Uniparty cares not for the wishes of freedom loving Americans.

      Ten years ago I would never have believed America could sink to this level of depravity. These next few months and years will be the stuff of legends in the history books of the future. How they will turn out, nobody yet knows. Pray for us all, for if the Uniparty wins this war, freedom will slowly but surely be extinguished throughout America and then what is left of the western world.

  3. Just remember, according to this corrupt judge, a jury vote of 4 out of 7, is unanimous.
    Defence witnesses were prohibited from testifying.
    A convicted felon, lying on the stand, was found credible.
    Dusty Stormy perjured herself from previous testimony in court, public statements and signed affidavits. And she still hasn’t paid Trump from his previous WINNING trial against her. No axe to grind there, nosirree Bob.

    CLOWN WORLD.

  4. This ‘verdict’ may well portend the Democratic party is wiped out in the next election.

  5. The next move is it goes Congress to remove Trump from the ballot as he is a convicted felon. Do they have enough goods on Republican members to get their 60% ? It isn’t looking good.

    1. It isn’t up to Congress who is on the ticket for either party.

      It MAY be up to the SCOTUS to set the entire charade of a trial aside though…

        1. Not before the appeal process ends, and that will be when the SCOTUS hears the arguments

          Also, President Donald J. Trump wasn’t found guilty of insurrection. It was for very similar to what Paula Jones cashed her $850k check from Bill Clinton for….

          1. Nobody knows what he was found guilty of.
            As far as the hooker is concerned she said it did not happen and put that in writing and owes Trump $300,000 in another judgement. New York democrats are dumb as a bag of rocks.

    2. If s,o the GOP doesn’t deserve to exist and should just surrender to the uniparty.

    3. There is nothing in the constitutional requirements for president that prevents a “felon” from running.

  6. Hilarious that you’re all whining. Jury was agreed upon by both the defence and prosecution and the choices of the jury were swift and clear, despite facing the best legal defence money can buy.

    Make excuses all day, in the eyes of the law the man is guilty. Does anyone here really believe that Mr. Grab’m by the p*ssy was above sleeping with a porn star and trying to make that story go away at all costs?

    Outside of this echo chamber expect to see a small but significant share of Trump voters jump ship.

    1. Please be sure to stop in again when this verdict is overturned on one of many legimate grounds, after the election,

    2. It is perfectly legal to bang pornstars. It is perfectly legal to pay them off. The crooked judge would not allow the defence to say hush money is legal. The second crime was not mentioned until after the defence’s closing arguments so no defence could be presented.

      1. The judge demanded 3 of the charges would be his judgments. Only 4 juriors would decide Trump’s guilt. a total of 12 for the 3 charges. He called it 4-4-4. He would convict if 12 juriors said yes. 8 saying no, didn’t matter. Just 4.
        Everyone’s still shocked. He loaded the trial. Sandbag the defense. 1st time in hisstory. Even Stalin never set up a socialist trial that would be
        This certain. Now Trump has no bail, jail for 3 months before sentenced. Judges and lawyers heads are still spinning. Wow,and Wow, WOWEsers.

    3. “and trying to make that story go away at all costs?”
      That’s not a crime. Actually, in this case, we don’t actually know what the crime was. That should be a good basis for appeal.

    4. So when does Slick Willy get prosecuted for paying off someone he had an affair with. How about the rapes he committed. How about all the other members of Congress and Senators benefited from payments to sexual harassment victims. This is a Pandora’s box that will completely destroyed voter’s trust in the electoral process.

    5. Hilarious that you don’t have a clue what went on in the courtroom. No, he is not guilty in the eyes of the law. He was “guilty” in a court that resembles the Volksgerichtshof. Watch for a significant share of the undecideds to move to Trump.

    6. The porn star in question (Stormy Daniels) signed a letter before the trial stating she never had an affair with Donald Trump. Trump may well be willing to sleep with porn stars but not this one.

      Judge Merchan’s rulings and his instructions to the jury are a legal travesty. Given the egregious biases at play and the willingness of the prosecution and judge to twist the law into a pretzel the guilty verdict was a foregone conclusion.

      The process is the punishment. Appeals will be successful but will take months. Well past the election. The political objective of this lawfare is bearing its politically poisoned fruit. The judicial system in New York has been cast into disrepute.

    7. “Does anyone here really believe that Mr. Grab’m by the p*ssy was above sleeping with a porn star and trying to make that story go away at all costs? ”

      Does anyone here believe that was illegal in any way even if it did happen?

      “Outside of this echo chamber expect to see a small but significant share of Trump voters jump ship.”

      Being a left-wing troll, you clearly have no understanding how actual Trump voters think, do you? So many of them rushed to give campaign donations that they CRASHED HIS WEBSITE. That’s how much this pisses them off (not to mention how many new Trump supporters have just been created). You honestly have no idea what you have unleashed here, do you?

      1. I guess 100 million votes must be in the pipe for Biden now, as the 90 million for Trump must be overcome.

  7. Sure, Jan.
    Mueller Ain’t Going Away, yadda yadda yadda.
    This just put Trump into landslide territory.

  8. Upon sentencing, the defense will almost surely file an appeal. And according to at least some media commentators, there’s a solid basis for one, as some of the courtroom decisions were rather odd.

    1. I think the last thing the judge did, telling the jurors they didn’t have to all think there were the same underlying crime for it to be considered unanimous , was their move to make sure it is overturned.

      They wanted to take Trump out regarding the election, they don’t want this to actually set a precedent that could bite them in the ass in the future.

      1. “I think the last thing the judge did, telling the jurors they didn’t have to all think there were the same underlying crime for it to be considered unanimous , was their move to make sure it is overturned.”

        And they also didnn’t even have to know what actual crime was committed, either.

        “They wanted to take Trump out regarding the election, they don’t want this to actually set a precedent that could bite them in the ass in the future.”

        Interesting theory. It would certainly explain the gross ineptitude of the judge…who apparently wasn’t even a regular judge.

    2. unDORK
      Stay silent when confused, the defense will seek an emergency relief hearing from SCOTUS, as happened in Bush vs Gore 2000.

    3. Rather odd? That’s like saying the titanic struck a rather large ice cube. The prosecution never named the underlying offense that transformed a New York misdemeanor into a federal felony.

    4. They’re not going to wait until sentencing. I expect an appeal within 48 hours.

  9. Even many Democrats seem oddly unenthused over this trial. I suspect they know how easily the law can be bent for political purposes these days.

  10. Anyone want to guess how many TDS bots were gonna get in this thread? Over/Under?

    1. .Trump donation website has crashed 2 times. Biden had a felony Trump rally maybe 50 came , 25 reporters.

  11. I have wondered how you can defend yourself at trial if the prosecution doesn’t tell you what the crime was supposed to be.

    “To indict Trump on felony charges and circumvent the expired statute of limitations, Bragg had to claim the records were falsified to conceal or commit another crime — which remained unclear throughout the trial but was assumed to be either a campaign finance or election law violation.”

    Also, from what I gathered from reports, the judge direction to the jury was that you can find him guilty, unanimously, if you all agree he broke some laws, of any kind apparently. So one guy can believe he broke an election law, one can believe he broke a campaign law, and one can believe he broke a tax law.

    This is wildly confusing. So, in the end he is guilty of what? What law was broken when it was never actually stated?

    The media and the Democrats got their man though, for now. It will only make Trump stronger, and they will regret it once it goes to appeal.

  12. The Senate has been really quiet for an awfully long time respecting the money trail investigation on all the Biden family. Did it fizzle out or will it draw more attention now?

  13. There could be hundreds of people snapping in America right now and going out for vengeance and it would NEVER be reported.

    Even if there were hundreds of mass shootings, the media wouldn’t want to officially announce the start of the second Civil War.

    Please let this be the start of the fight for freedom that spreads worldwide.

    1. Not yet.

      At some point, people have nothing left to lose and then all shit breaks loose. Fortunately, all of my enemies are poisoned and dying off.

  14. Witch trials, show trials and kangaroo courts always convict. There was never any doubt. Fortunately, Trump has a majority of constitutionalists on the SCOTUS and this will never stand. I bet even a couple of liberal judges vote to reverse this on appeal. Unfortunately, it may not matter. Bragg. James, Murchan et al knew all this too. They’re evil not stupid.

    1. Thomas
      They need to check bank accounts for all those involved in the schiff show, including the”judge’s”.

  15. That is your delusion and yours alone. Trump will win on appeal easily due to judge bias and reversible error.
    You clearly have not been paying attention. All your DeNiro Trump fantasies are front and centre for voters.
    Who will never re-elect Biden, hence this, other “prosecutions.” Collectivist clowns have sealed Trump’s victory.

    1. The whole thing was a complete farce and only very stupid people put any stock in it.

  16. What was the crime and who was the victim?

    As far as I can tell- he labeled $120k he paid to his lawyer as ‘legal expenses’

    so… he defrauded himself?
    If there was tax fraud, they’d be screaming it from the rooftops…

    Should have just called it “goodwill.”
    Paying off some ho you banged is perfectly legal? (If true- Highly suspect Ho in this case) otherwise half of Hollywood and DC would be in jail.

    1. The claim is that he did it to “influence the election” in a state he didn’t win, and thus violated election laws, by not paying it as a campaign expense, when the FEC said it’s not a campaign expense.

      1. Don’t forget that the former head (IIRC) of the FEC who wanted to testify at trial but was blocked from doing so by the tyrannical judge, was going to testify, among other things, that in the FEC’s view it would have been illegal to even classify such an expense as a campaign expense in the first place.

      2. “The claim is that he did it to “influence the election” in a state he didn’t win, and thus violated election laws, by not paying it as a campaign expense, when the FEC said it’s not a campaign expense.”

        But were not even allowed to testify to that fact, apparently.

  17. Ah, an opportunity for leftists to express how compassionate and caring they are for people, by telling others to just die. Thank you for your willing confessions.

  18. You are no doubt dying from the shots your lord and master Justin ordered you to take, you will be forgotten as well.

  19. Comment lifted from X.
    “ weird that he is the First Former U.S. President that has been convicted of a crime ? All the rest of them were angels ?”

    1. I recall when Trump as President was impeached by Dems for no more than saying (somewhat jokingly) in a phone call to Ukraine, “Hey, if you have any dirt on Biden, let us know.”
      His “crime” was trying to undermine a rival Presidential candidate – before Biden was nominated for anything. Now if he was to be an upcoming candidate, Americans should now if he violated the law.
      Now we have completely sham trials to undermine an actual candidate, and the nature of the crime is not even clear. I am sickened by all of this. In the US, the justice system had been manipulated for political gain.

  20. Perfect.
    An Orange Man in an orange jumpsuit,Prisoner #1 on the front, running for President.
    This is America today,even our Progressive Comrades will be choking on the smell.
    The first rule of civilization.
    Do not crap in your own bed.
    Our deranged friends are too stupid to even meet that standard.
    Does leave me wondering..Why are the Demonrats so insistent on ensuring Donald Trump gets reelected?Assuming they are capable of reasoning..

    1. That’s simple. They are so deep in corruption that they were fighting for their survival. Country, judicial and political processes be damned. They just don’t realize what they have unleashed

    2. Oh, they’re not trying to get Trump reelected. They intend to cancel the election. There will be no vote. This was a declaration of civil war. The only question now is when and how to fight it. The Democrats will leave office when their dead bodies are dragged out of it, and not before.

  21. I liked the part where the first time the defense heard what the actual law was that Trump purportedly broke, was in the jury instructions, which the defense wasn’t even given time to read before they were read, and after the trial was over. This is the same as ramming through a 5K page bill in Congress a day after it has been introduced, and before anybody could possibly read it.

    Either this is the start of the greatest comeback since Washington crossing the Delaware, or “government of the people, by the people, and for the people” as Lincoln called it, as “perished from the earth” as he feared.

  22. Make sure you come back with your tail between our legs and your foot firmly planted in your mouth when Trump not only wins re-election, reverses all of on appeal, and opens the door for Trump/DOJ retribution.
    DeMarxists have taken up a fight to the death with Donald Trump, and they will get it good and hard.

  23. So that delusion includes the Wall Street Journal.
    Good for you.

    When the civil war goes hot, the last thing that will go through your mind is a 5.56 piece of lead.

  24. I knew the troll(s) would show up.
    Prolly a thimble-dicked basement sniffer or a Katie Telford Turnip from the bureaucracy.
    Any Democrat who wants Donald in jail wants to be shot.
    Be careful what you troll for you cunned stunt.

    1. “I knew the troll(s) would show up.
      Prolly a thimble-dicked basement sniffer or a Katie Telford Turnip from the bureaucracy.”

      I think it’s only one, and not bright enough to even attempt to change his/her posting style.

      (possibly even a bot of some kind?)

  25. The weirdest thing is that business illiterate people on a jury might actually believe that the President of the USA and CEO of the Trump empire would actually be telling accountants how to post legal expenses. It doesn’t take genius to call legal expenses legal expenses. CEOs don’t tell accounting clerks how to post things because CEOs typically know very little about accounting.

    1. And there were two New York lawyers on this jury who obviously know nothing about the constitution.

  26. Conservatives had better learn to play by the same rule book the left uses sooner than later. Any conservative that leaves a left wing bureaucracy intact deserves what they get.

    Danielle Smith and Pollievre had better be paying attention.

  27. Legacy media, et. al. are all giddy with glee over this to the point they all have wet crotches.

  28. Alvin Bragg made the big time!
    Imagine every tv clip showing the stoopidfatfacedfuk called a stoopidfatfacedfuk by 95 million people??
    Quite plausible.

  29. You are clearly not acquainted with what went on in the “trial”. But that’s typical of leftist morons.

  30. Rabid one eyed dog catches car moment and the cluster B head-cases think they won.

  31. What we witness today was the first shot of America’s next civil war and it’s not going to be a happy ending for the progressives in any shape or form. Not only are the right of center are armed to the teeth ( A gun behind every blade of grass), they are sitting on an estimated 11 to 17 billion rounds of ammunition, almost 2 to 3 times the US military have on stock.
    Then their is the loyal element of the military to there constitution and will not participate in “bath room berries” end run around the constitution with this blatant attempt at a third world coup d’etat to eliminate a front runner that will obliterate there status quo.
    The next 5 months will tell if they go into a full shooting civil war, particularly if the DOJ continues this banana republic attempt to destroy Trump.
    Hang on it’s not over by a long shot.
    It will interesting what the US Supreme Court will do with this once this lands in there lap (and it will) for it will defiantly separate the true constitutionals form the pretend conservative justices ( Roberts).
    America is definitely living in “interesting times”.

    1. YEP…How many generations of American VETERNs still know how to lock n load..??
      Likely in the order of 80-100 Million..??
      ….and many own far more lethal equipment than just a 9mm/.45 & an AR.

      I hope that when they are done with the GARBAGE in Washington, they turn North to Ottawa, a place that requires SANITIZING big time.

  32. Well, the current version of USA (v4.0) is done. The Democrats have busted it and it cannot be repaired easily, if at all.

  33. A great outcome for Trump and even better one for his current and future supporters. Also another important precedent , I believe this will have been no. 13, has been established for dealing with former presidents.

  34. The underlying crime Trump committed, and about which media pundits have been speculating all afternoon, is obvious: Running for President as a Republican. An obvious felony in New York. Almost as heinous as trying to obtain higher education while Jewish.

  35. “Your stupid clown leader is going to jail.”

    He will never even get near a jail cell.

    “You suckers really know how to pick a winner.”

    As opposed to the senile old codger you favor?

  36. Dream on & on Sonny, and kindly go get your 6th – 12th Boosters shots…ALL at once.
    YOU and your ilk are De-facto Waste of Oxygen..

  37. Spoken like some ignorant (_i_)hole Commie basement dweller from the pigpen.. oops, I meant the ‘Peg.
    1st time poster no doubt.
    Liberal Voter no doubt
    Vaxxed up to the eyeballs no doubt.
    Simple Servant no doubt
    Union Member no doubt
    Anti-Semite no doubt.
    …and wears his mask in a car w/windows rolled up tight

    Get stuffed ya dipshit..

  38. On Twitter Andrew Coyne and Warren Kinesella are dancing and howling like characters in Lord Of The Flies, and for the same reasons.

Navigation