9 Replies to “Supreme Court Oral Arguments on Presidential Immunity”

  1. Many of them are brainwashed by the mainstream media deception and laws didn’t apply to them.
    As deception in reporting is widespread and legal as it’s opinions that are legal inside the deception of spinning the narrative around. Interviews are deceptively used by creative editing techniques.
    And MANY, MANY people believe this crap as they don’t think lies are being used.

  2. I suspect this will end up 5-4 or 6-3, with a bunch of torturing of the english language from the left.

  3. I don’t profess to be an Atticus Finch or Perry Mason but I think Justice Alito just opened up the case that the American voter was railroaded in 2020. Alito expounded that it was incumbent for the sitting president to ensure the integrity of the election. When Trump questioned the results of the election he was within his rights as sitting president to ensure the results. When Barr failed to fully investigate the questionable proceedings that were reported after the election he was in dereliction of his duties as AG. When Pence went through the process of certification, he also was in dereliction of his duties. The same can be said of SCOTUS when they refused to hear the objections to the election. So all in all there would seem to be a case that there was the biggest miscarriage of justice in American history, conducted by the “STATE” to prevent Trump from retaining office.

    1. Well said, Antenor.

      People with nothing to hide don’t mind an examination of the facts to confirm that they won fairly, and they sure as hell don’t spend *millions* of dollars trying to stop such efforts.

  4. It was heartening to see Trump interact with construction workers in New York. There is plenty of reasons to believe that the last election was corrupted. Of course the nay sayers maintain the ” no evidence ” mantra. I have no doubt that there is no limit to what his opponents will do to keep him out of the Whitehouse. The recent exposure of redacted documents is very telling. Trump is winning but I don’t think he will survive this. Will we?

    1. “There is plenty of reasons to believe that the last election was corrupted. Of course the nay sayers maintain the ” no evidence ” mantra.”

      Well, yes…when you *refuse to look* for any evidence, you never do find any. Funny how that works.

Navigation