Imagine…
All those bylaws…
Rescinded very soon…
(Sung by John Lennon)
Robert … that’s all well and good for Matt Walsh to make hay over the “fact” that the City of San Francisco has solved the homeless problem and cleaned the streets of the city. Proving that they CAN solve the homeless problem, if they want. But he’s wrong. Nothing has been solved. The homeless have been moved to way South of Market to Hunters Point. They’ve not been institutionalized (as they all NEED) … they’ve not been hospitalized (as many need) … and they’ve not been killed. They’ve simply had their tents moved 20 blocks to the South.
And the city has only power washed the fenced-off streets for a few blocks around the APEC … and the Asian tourist spots … the rest of the streets are filthy
SF can’t and won’t solve the homeless problem. It’s become a cash cow … and the EXTREME leftists in charge of the city are dedicated propping up their “alternative” lifestyles. Nothing has been “solved” … nothing WILL be solved
Government is never about “solving a problem” as that would reduce both their power and available funds.
Government creed:
If you see light at the end of the tunnel…..Order more tunnel!
“They’ve not been institutionalized (as they all NEED) … they’ve not been hospitalized (as many need) … and they’ve not been killed.”
Well. San Francisco elites would see such common-sense approaches as setting an awful precedent.
There’s a reason they made it impossible to lock up the criminally insane until AFTER they’ve harmed someone, not before, no matter how obvious a threat they are to others. Half of San Francisco’s elites would be in asylums with little hope of coming out again, and not just the groomers by a long shot.
On top of everything else—who is Newsom trying to fool?
Xi Jinping knows better, or should know better. Do you think his agents Stateside haven’t briefed him on what a pit San Francisco is?
His men in Ottawa have used the city’s plague of drunk and violent Indian and Eskimo vagrants in their propaganda, claiming (probably truthfully) that they’re a threat to their comrades in the Chinese trade bureau downtown.
Even the North Koreans never tire of comparing vagrant-ridden American cities to Pyongyang, where there are no vagrants, because living in Pyongyang is a privilege, not a right.
“They Must Go”—obliging undesirables to leave the area where they are causing problems and seeing to it they stay gone—is a generally applicable solution to a whole host of problems, social, political and economic. Even what the busybodies call “gentrification” is simply the phenomenon of a neighbourhood healing after the local beggars, prostitutes and drug dealers are finally driven out.
All it takes is a bit of courage on the part of leaders willing to take the side of their peoples against so-called “elites,” foreign or domestic, who simply refuse to address any problem that does not inconvenience them personally. (At best they ignore it, at worst they find ways to make money from it.)
“Where will they go?” ask the bleeding hearts. Does it matter? Does it matter to Jews where the Gazan Arabs go, as long as it’s far away from them?
Is Pripyat an option? I hear there’s lots of affordable housing there, and I’m sure Zelensky needs all the cannon fodder he can get.
Something not understood by politicians or do-gooders; they are creating homelessness through policy decisions that allow continuous open-air drug-use in the downtown core of major cities. This draws people away from their support system and further destroys their lives. We get to watch it up close in slow-motion.
Where did they relocate the homeless in San Francisco and did they all die. I doubt it. And they’ll be back. Because the policy welcomes them.
Sounds quite a bit like British Columbia, Canada…
https://www.howestreet.com/2023/11/leaving-a-mark/
Imagine…
All those bylaws…
Rescinded very soon…
(Sung by John Lennon)
Robert … that’s all well and good for Matt Walsh to make hay over the “fact” that the City of San Francisco has solved the homeless problem and cleaned the streets of the city. Proving that they CAN solve the homeless problem, if they want. But he’s wrong. Nothing has been solved. The homeless have been moved to way South of Market to Hunters Point. They’ve not been institutionalized (as they all NEED) … they’ve not been hospitalized (as many need) … and they’ve not been killed. They’ve simply had their tents moved 20 blocks to the South.
And the city has only power washed the fenced-off streets for a few blocks around the APEC … and the Asian tourist spots … the rest of the streets are filthy
SF can’t and won’t solve the homeless problem. It’s become a cash cow … and the EXTREME leftists in charge of the city are dedicated propping up their “alternative” lifestyles. Nothing has been “solved” … nothing WILL be solved
Government is never about “solving a problem” as that would reduce both their power and available funds.
Government creed:
If you see light at the end of the tunnel…..Order more tunnel!
“They’ve not been institutionalized (as they all NEED) … they’ve not been hospitalized (as many need) … and they’ve not been killed.”
Well. San Francisco elites would see such common-sense approaches as setting an awful precedent.
There’s a reason they made it impossible to lock up the criminally insane until AFTER they’ve harmed someone, not before, no matter how obvious a threat they are to others. Half of San Francisco’s elites would be in asylums with little hope of coming out again, and not just the groomers by a long shot.
On top of everything else—who is Newsom trying to fool?
Xi Jinping knows better, or should know better. Do you think his agents Stateside haven’t briefed him on what a pit San Francisco is?
His men in Ottawa have used the city’s plague of drunk and violent Indian and Eskimo vagrants in their propaganda, claiming (probably truthfully) that they’re a threat to their comrades in the Chinese trade bureau downtown.
Even the North Koreans never tire of comparing vagrant-ridden American cities to Pyongyang, where there are no vagrants, because living in Pyongyang is a privilege, not a right.
“They Must Go”—obliging undesirables to leave the area where they are causing problems and seeing to it they stay gone—is a generally applicable solution to a whole host of problems, social, political and economic. Even what the busybodies call “gentrification” is simply the phenomenon of a neighbourhood healing after the local beggars, prostitutes and drug dealers are finally driven out.
All it takes is a bit of courage on the part of leaders willing to take the side of their peoples against so-called “elites,” foreign or domestic, who simply refuse to address any problem that does not inconvenience them personally. (At best they ignore it, at worst they find ways to make money from it.)
“Where will they go?” ask the bleeding hearts. Does it matter? Does it matter to Jews where the Gazan Arabs go, as long as it’s far away from them?
Is Pripyat an option? I hear there’s lots of affordable housing there, and I’m sure Zelensky needs all the cannon fodder he can get.
Something not understood by politicians or do-gooders; they are creating homelessness through policy decisions that allow continuous open-air drug-use in the downtown core of major cities. This draws people away from their support system and further destroys their lives. We get to watch it up close in slow-motion.
Where did they relocate the homeless in San Francisco and did they all die. I doubt it. And they’ll be back. Because the policy welcomes them.
Then and Now: https://youtu.be/ftHtB-9yCSY
Of course Californication will vote Democrat again.
That’s not even up for question.