38 Replies to “Canada’s Climate Change Carnage”

  1. Just watched this.
    He is so clear in his wonderfully subtle way.

    I see what you did there.
    As soon as CBC picks up on these facts you just know it will be blamed on Climate change.

    1. Dr. Denis Rancourt’s opening statement starting at about the 4 minutes mark of the video on Rumble, stating that if gov’t hadn’t done anything, there’d be no excess deaths, no excess vaccination deaths.

      Wow.
      And his C.V. is 50 pages long. The mental case PM of Canada should have someone read some of this to him someday…

  3. “These excess deaths are not caused by COVID.”

    Campbell’s argument at the beginning that COVID is not causing excess deaths is laughably poor. Just because COVID usually causes mild cold-like symptoms doesn’t mean it always does, and those exceptions can be deadly. They may be rare compared to overall COVID cases, but enough to appreciably add to excess deaths.

    If you want to know how many deaths COVID is causing, you just have to look the publically available statistics.

    1. Which is covered very well by Dr Denis Rancourt.
      His research proves you wrong.

      1. Then Campbell better cite that research in his presentation, because as it stands his argument is not convining.

        But I can not find a published paper by Rancourt on that. Perhaps you could tell me where that is.

        1. Obviously you didn’t check the vid from NCI.
          He lists his published papers

          1. Then he should have cited such studies in the video, because his argument as presented in the video was spurious.

    2. You are overlooking the ages of people dying. Lots of young people dying from strokes and heart attacks. Covid is an old person’s illness. Most dying from Covid have been over 80.

    3. You keep clinging to this irrational belief in the incorruptibility of peer review and “public statistics”, despite the fact that there’s a mountain of evidence now that both are complete bollocks. The people lying to you about COVID and the people responsible for the accuracy of the “public statistics” are the same people.

      1. I have never in my life claimed peer review nor public statistics are incorruptible. You’re making it up wholesale.

        But peer review is generally far better than no peer review. Without peer review, papers get published that do not withstand even modest critical assessment.

        And public statistics are the only game in town when it comes to the number of COVID deaths. Campbell himself uses public statistics in the above video. Didn’t you notice? He just didn’t use them well.

          1. You got something better, let’s hear it. Certainly dropping peer review won’t help.

          2. What the study REALLY points to is the need for more replication. No one paper or author should automatically be believed.

            Just like Rancourt’s views should not be believed just because it confirms what some people hope to be true. He’s just one guy who’s not even published a proper paper on his views. Are his results confirmed by other researchers and papers?

        2. That’s actually incorrect. As the field of cybersecurity already knows, no security is better than security that doesn’t work because the not-working security lulls people into a false sense of security. They stop being vigilant.

          We’ve seen this repeated over and over again in other contexts: P. S. Knight has, to his detriment, proven that the CSA is a total sham – yet it is still held up as a standard of quality.

          Without peer review, papers get published that do not withstand even modest critical assessment.

          As we’ve seen over and over recently, with peer review papers get published that do not withstand even modest critical assessment. But because people like you insist that mUh pEeR rEvIeW means there must be a corn of credibility somewhere in the manure pile of garbage papers, we’re supposed to ignore the size of the manure pile?

          Get rid of formal peer review entirely and things will be no worse, but the knowledge that scientific papers aren’t being checked for quality means people will stop accepting them as gospel just because mUh pEEr rEvIeW.

          1. Have you actually had an article peer reviewed, or carried out peer review, or been an editor responsible for carrying out peer review?

            I’ve done all three, and I can tell you that (1) most badly flawed articles get screened out by the process and (2) almost every other article gets improved by it.

            Of course peer review sometimes lets through a badly flawed or even fraudulent article, as the reviewers do not have the resources to repeat the experiments. Mostly they have to trust that the data presented is valid. But doing no peer review lets through *EVERYTHING*, no matter how rubbishy.

      2. I think it’s easy to be led off-track about research studies and peer review. I think this is done intentionally to take the focus away from what’s happening with conflicts of interest (COI) between pharamaceutical companies, government agencies that are supposed to regulate pharamaceutical products for the protection of the public, researchers paid by pharamaceutical companies and corporate lobbyists who are influencing politicians.

        There’s a big difference between complaining about peer review and governments subsidizing stupid research like “The U.S. National Institutes of Health funded a $592,527 study to explain why Chimpanzees throw their feces” and complaints about COI when it comes to life/death/disability of
        pharamaceutical products.

        Reforming the drug approval process and removing pharmaceutical companies immense influence and implementing significant penalties for malfeasance by corporations, researchers and public officials should be the focus right now.

    4. Fat Rodent

      You mean the publicly available statistics that use ALL the “non-vaccinated” deaths between October, 2021 and March of 2020 as the denominator in the Relative Risk Reduction calculation while using only May to October 2021 vaccinated deaths to calculate the numerator? Those statistics?

      And as for peer research, which you endlessly bleat about – the B.C. government used this following paper as justification for its forced-vaccination mandates. A paper that sat as a pre-print for six months while the government destroyed people’s lives:

      https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.26.21265397v1.full-text

      If non-peer reviewed research is good enough for a government to declare forced vaccine mandates and strip people of the ability to earn a living, then your argument against Rancourt’s publications is by comparison, a vapidly weak rebuttal.

      I should point out that of the 1,531, 236 vaxed and unvaxed test subjects in this paper, not a single one appears to have died. Which – and I’ll spell it out for you – created a zero RRR for dying of Covid-19!
      Zip!
      Nada!
      SFA!

      Also, the included “Ethics Statement” is interesting. It becomes obvious upon reading it that the B.C. and Quebec governments legislated the authors, who are essentially government civil servants, into publishing this “research.” In response, the authors cover their collective asses by declaring they sought an ethics review for the research, which was refused by the government. That, and the fact it took them six months to get this published, even under the pro-Covid hysteria that was gripping most medical journals, demonstrated that these “publicly” available statistics didn’t pass the smell test for most medical researchers and “peer reviewers.” I wonder how much back-room arm twisting and grant-bribing went on to make publication happen?

      Screw your disinformation.

      1. I notice that not a single person here has tried to refute my original point, which is that Campbell made a childishly weak argument trying to convince us that COVID produces no excess deaths.

        And again, Campbell makes ample use of public statistics, which is apparently fine if it’s arguing for something you agree with, but instantly because questionable when argued the other way.

        1. Fat Rodent
          You glow, as they say on 4chan.
          You haven’t responded to a single point in the comments. Instead you just keep changing the subject. I don’t see you providing any links to the “peer-reviewed” research you keep claiming supports your point of view. So there is no way we can judge for ourselves whether your point of view is valid. Yet you think we should be deferential in our responses?
          Campbell’s video is open to “peer review”. That’s what the YT comments section is for. Yet I am not seeing any of the government Covid-19 “experts” – which you think are so important – responding to his questions. Campbell also openly provides his references and we can decide whether or not they have any validity. Again, you provide nothing to support your point of view other than the usual leftist appeal to authority.
          Since you keep alluding to expertise, what are your credentials? Please provide your full name so I can look up your publication record.

          1. My point of view is this: Campbell made a very weak argument. If you don’t want to discuss that then don’t bother responding to my comment.

    5. Your arguments are laughably nonexistent. Your belief in “covid” borders on the religious.

      1. At least I bring an argument to the table.

        You bring insults and put downs, adding nothing.

  4. Ah big deal. As my left wing friend is fond of telling me, “Tom, there’s too many people in the world.”

    1. I imagine he wouldnt be ok with himself making the sacrifice to fix it eh? Its always others

    2. As my left wing friend is fond of telling me

      Oh yeah we know this guy you’re so fond of. And fond of quoting. “Pff. Freedom.”

      Ottawa bureaucrats. Waste of air.

    3. Ironically vaxx maxed leftards are the number 1 most likely to die suddenly. Some even keep signing up for it. The wef/Soros/who/chicom plan really didn’t think through who would take the kill shots.

  5. It finally happened. A coworker of mine died suddenly the other day. 100% vaxx death at 42. The whole thing was a bio weapon.

    1. People are dropping unexpectedly yet the only words I see or hear are died suddenly. The new cause of death in healthy young people.

  6. Ah Omicron, the less lethal variant. That does not explain the excess deaths in January and February of 2022. Those excess deaths are nearly all vax. How do you explain away that dramatically huge spike on Omicron? Take these graphs and overlay them with vax uptake stats, et voila. Most 2nd doses were taken in the fall of 2021 and the 3rd dose was also introduced in Sept. 2021.

  7. Oh, I think the lack of autopsies on those who die of unknown causes and the embargo of their vaccination status gives a huge hint as to what is causing excess deaths.

    Given the gross abuse of data collection and statistics from public health and government bureacrats, I wouldn’t trust any of their numbers or the integrity of their analytics.. More accurate numbers might be found in life insurance payouts, increased drug plan reimbursements and increased disability claims in the working age population. Edward Dowd in the US has reported quite concerning stats from insurance companies that have occurred since the covid vaccine rollout .

    I suspect, like vioxx and pandemrix, it will take a decade for the truth to be fully revealed.

    1. LC, I agree whole heartedly.
      Except this current bunch of bureaucrats will do everything in their power,to ensure the truth does not escape.

      That lack of autopsy in any case of “Sudden ‘inexplicable’ death”.damns our entire healthcare bureau and every one of the doctors employed by it.
      For it is quite obvious they seek to “Not Know.”.

      And the glaring corruption of the healthcare statistic should embarrass every observer..
      When the stats look bad?
      Change the measurement system..
      Good enough for government,I guess.
      Canadian Health Stats are now so bad as to be useless..By design.
      So only a fool or liar would claim “meaning from them” as of mid 2021.

      Now our current bunch of fools and bandits,showed us how they respond to an emergency..
      Sure one that only existed in their panicked peabrains,but they showed us their abilities..
      Abilities being an extreme use of sarcasm.

      They also showed us their utter contempt for us,the tax paying citizens and demonstrated their incompetence and stunning ignorance of those things they proclaimed themselves “expert” in.

      We have learnt some very interesting things,about our parasitic overload of “helpers” and about our fellow citizens..
      None of which contradict the lessons history holds .
      Except we never learn from history.

      The truth of Dread Covid Theatre will have “The cone of silence” clamped over and then be buried in heaps of horse shit and feeble misdirection,which the likes of the Marmot provides.

      Bottom line?
      Evil?
      Stupid?
      Both.

      Our institutions failed to prevent mass hysteria,whipped up public terror over a “Common Cold” Virus and then lied continually.

      “The Science says”.
      “No existing treatments work”.
      “Government Goo,double plus good for you”.

      The lies are what we seek to “reward them” for.
      These institution,such as public health,are proven useless and have been used as a weapon of control against the citizenry.
      Disband them,hang those responsible.

      Truth ?
      They panicked.
      Revealed themselves unfit for any power over the citizen.
      While causing us massive financial harm.
      Proving to us we have neither rights nor freedoms ,when they,the government, are in a state of panic.(Their natural state of mind).
      And the evidence all points to one conclusion.
      If these “helpers” had done nothing at all,most of us would have never even known “Covid” was a thing.
      The final numbers,for what they are worth,show “Death from Covid” to be less than seasonal flu..And each review,these number drop some more.
      The crimes committed by these minions during their state of panic are numerous,the most egregious being the murder of those in government run retirement homes.
      Those numbers stagger the imagination,moving my assignment of motive,from ignorance to malice.
      When compared,those dying in Government Care versus those dying in their own homes..in the same age group..Murder most foul.
      Involuntary MAID..
      So “truth” will need some mighty bloody minded friend,if it ever hopes to see daylight.

      1. Was out in the vegetable garden. May long weekend is typically my outdoor garden planting time.

        As to your response, our politicians, public health bureaucrats, drug regulators, etc. have created a colossal mess of things due to greed, corruption and incompetence. I think this has gone way past the renovation stage. The existing agencies need to be condemned, destroyed and then a newer, better system built from scratch.

  8. In the old USSR the joke was “what do you mean there’s no milk, just go to your radio for a pail of it, cause it says there’s lots to be had!”

  9. Hey! If you guys don’t stop taking off your clothes and posing for KM, he’s going to die from a strangulated weenie.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation