Or should it be “Mr. Information”? So hard to tell these days. In any case, “misinformation” appears to be the new go-to phrase used to explain why someone rejects your ideas. Or in this instance, why people failed to cotton on to a new advertising mascot whose shtick openly mocked women.
Instead of taking the blame for the company’s catastrophic attempt to virtue signal, even if it means alienating the vast majority of its clients, Doukeris instead blamed online “misinformation and confusion”, including reports that Mulvaney’s Bud Light can is “a production can and every can would be like the one that was in that post . . . We never intended to make it for general production and sale for the public.” Well, that’s just a brilliant way for InBev to also alienate the progressives after scrambling to distance itself from the entire fiasco.
Looks like InBev is taking the Biden-Trudeau approach: it’s always someone else’s fault, never ours.
Our Progressive Comrades have worn this narrative out.
“Never mind our actions,trust our stated intentions..”
Then they lie..
All the time.
So their words mean nothing,a pickled parrot makes more sense.
The only truth we ,tool users, can identify is their actions.
So when they speak,we hear the opposite.
When they proclaim their “good intentions” we remember their past actions,that followed such lies.
Bud told us,that they make tranny fluid..
OK.
Still will not drink their swill.
This Bud’s for you, too
There are a couple of interesting things here. The first is that Doukeris is a low grade moron who not only pretends to attempt a blatant lie but also manages to irritate the alphabet people who were supposed to benefit from this. With Doukeris ganking himself so badly, he’s just asking to be the first corpse impaled over the city gates in retribution for this. Shareholders will demand a body dumped in the gutter, and Doukeris just volunteered.
The second interesting thing is how vigorously the lamestream media is ignoring the whole thing. They are complete hostages. InBev is such a huge advertiser that essentially they own the media because of the amount of advertising space InBev takes up. It’s almost comical to watch every major news outlet frantically trying to ignore the whole thing. And in the process proving that they are owned completely.
Keep trying, dill-holes. You tried playing both sides of the fence with Colin Kaepernick, and look where that got you. Your audience numbers tanked.
All based on the ultimate misinformation that a person can actually change their gender by wishing, taking hormones and disfigurement.
Anheuser-Busch sure opened a big ol’ can of whoop ass.
If being “out of touch” means I don’t much care for an anemic 26 year old man putting on makeup, prancing around in dresses and giggling like a little girl, I’m content to remain out of touch until AB is out of business.
Boycott, Transcott, … keep on insulting your customers brilliant CEO you still need a Girlcott for the trifecta.
To those with social awareness and understand the English language …
We never intended …
Funny thing … “intent” cannot be determined by anyone other than the speaker. Hence anyone can lie about their “intent” with impunity. Given the avalanching fallout of Bud’s decision-making … I suspect they FULLY intended to shove this Tranny-branding up our tight-sphinctered butt holes. Only now … their CEO claims otherwise.
Tonight’s hockey game had a Molson ad featuring a drag queen.
Will they never learn?