13 Replies to “Poilievre On Peterson”

  1. Ain’t it funny how that needs to be explained to some people? Even quite a few around here.

  2. I warming to this guy. He’s intelligent and nuanced. There’s nothing “knee jerk” about him.

    1. The Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons across the country need their asses kicked good and hard as well. They have practice voodoo medicine since the beginning of the pandemic and have demanded all doctors do the same.

  3. The important thing about PP is that he’s commonsensically NORMAL. Look around you…..Biden….Boris Johnson….Macron…Scholz….Trudope….Zelensky…..Erdogan….Ursula von der Leyen and friends

    et al are all freaks.
    Putin Poilievre Orban are the few that pass the test for unbiased leadership of their countries. All the rest have big ideas.

  4. While I like PP, the Con Party worries the shit outta me.
    Big banks and Corps have a pantload of power and, as we saw in the Emergency Act Revelations, these c**ksuckers would happily get others to shoot grandmother protesters dead just to earn an extra nickel.
    I don’t trust anybody anymore.

  5. Heh,go read the comments on that twit feed.
    Why would any productive citizen contribute to the survival of people this stupid?
    MAID is a wonderful idea,not a slippery slope back to Genocide by Government nor Eugenics..hell no.
    Just permitting our Progressive Comrades to step off this mortal coil..The one they hate and fear so deeply.

    One of the “crimes” committed by Peterson..inviting a Population Doomster to go first.
    In a country that has legalized murder by doctor,making a joke about suicide is a crime.??.
    Liberalism is a progressive disease.
    Although another set of comments rightly lambast PP for his silence of the other Doctors being disciplined currently,by these same “Medical Bodies”..The doctors who attempted to practise medicine in Canada during Dread Covid Theatre.

    None make the obvious point,if we lived in a society that believed in truth and justice,the members of the “Board” would be running for their lives or already summarily dealt with by the mob by now..
    Oh well maybe in another 3 months.

    The “good Ethics” of “Get your Government Goo,its double plus good for you”
    “All Doctors who fail to support the previous official line will be censored”..
    And brought before this board..

    Peterson needs to have them fire him from their organization,so that he can clearly prove his claim not to be a member of the group of idiots,who after the Jonestown Jabs had failed,still insisted on deeming any citizen, who feared the Government Poison, as mentally ill.
    With extra paranoia status for doubting the whole medical profession..
    Hangings first Trail later.

  6. We’re here now. The leader of the CPC explains why free speech is important.

    Can anyone imagine Diefenbaker thinking he’d have to explain this? Brian Mulroney? (“Friends, I’d like to explain…why freedom of speech…is an important value for Canada.”)

    This is insanity.

  7. What Pierre Poilievre said here reminds me of Karl opper’s thinking in his very-lengthy book, “The Open Society and its Enemies”. Here is the Cole’s Notes version:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Open_Society_and_Its_Enemies

    Karl Popper was a philosopher of science, and stated that the reason science has progressed, during the Enlightenment onwards was that in science for a theory to be accepted it (1) has to be proven through repeated experiments and (2) not be falsified by an experiment.

    So Popper said democracies are superior, since free speech allows for dissidents to bring forth counter-arguments and evidence to disprove prevailing wisdom. Totalitarian environments — eg. Russia, China, sociology departments, the CBC — forbid the introduction of counter-argumentation and counter-evidence. These repressive institutions tend to rot from the inside and make bad decisions.

    One example: Canada’s elites now are supportive of violent criminals in criminal law. Canada’s elites are authoritarian, and do not allow any conservative counter-evidence against the march towards ultra-light sentencing and indifferent law enforcement. Conservatives bring forth counter-evidence that all of this leads to increases in violent crime, but all of this evidence is censored by the authoritarian elites.

Navigation