Trust The Science??

6 Replies to “Trust The Science??”

1. I think most of the reaction of the mainstream medical industry and the mainstream political and news industry can be described by the statement “they are paralyzed by the enormity of their error”. If what is alleged is true, hardly anyone in those three industries is innocent. Bad science and bad decisions often don’t get replaced by good science and good decisions, they are only replaced when their proponents die off. On a positive note I think far more realize what is happening then are letting on. I strongly suspect a huge undercurrent and I think when the tipping point is reached, it will be ugly.

   1. Lefty
      You must mean “enormity” in its original meaning…. to wit “great evil “
      Oh, and is there “good” science?
      Bring on the ugly tipping point. I am already there bra

2. It’s all about money. Big pharma has been buying politicians for ages. They run the med schools and the med journals They are big buyers of ads in the MSM. They own everything. Everybody is on the payroll.
   Is there any other possible outcome?

   1. I used to think that. But what will money mean when fiat currencies are vaporizerd and we are all force fed a “new and improved” digital currency? No, there’s something far more sinister in the rollout, distribution, and propaganda effort with the jabs. Digging into what the motivations and goals behind it are easily lead to some very dark corners. Many are slowly awakening to the fraud of the jabs but too many still credit government and medicine for having the best intentions. What if the opposite was the case?

3. Maria Caulfield’s response to the speech is disrespectful and bizarre. How to break this impasse.

4. I’m reminded of the old McDonalds slogan: “Billions served.”

   It is, anyway, only a pharmaceutical spin on Russian Roulette. The Home Version will likely be released in time for next Christmas.