43 Replies to “Because It’s 2015 2022”

  1. Then fire the bitch and hire someone based on what’s between their ears and not whats between their legs FFS.

    Any commoner would be fired on the spot for a comment like that.

    1. *
      What… you don’t think we should be using affirmative-action
      hiring to steer our National Police Force?       It’s obviously the
      way everything in Canuckistan is headed these days.

      Wonder what happens to women in ‘domestic abuse’ type
      situations when they appoint the inevitable Muslim to the
      Commissioner’s job?

      Allahu Akbar, whitey!

      *

      1. “Allahu Akbar, whitey!”

        Nice one, Neo.

        Some domestic abuse is more acceptable than others, right? “Cultural differences”…

  3. She also said this crap: “officials were simply “asking” and not directing — which is a “big distinction.””
    Just like Buffalo Bill in Silence of the Lambs, with “the lotion in the basket”, he was simply asking, not directing at all.
    They are all lying + obfuscating + treating all of us like idiots, good only to vote them in every 4 years.

  4. Oh. My. God. How thoroughly embarrassing for Canadians. I say Canadians because this is the mediocre bullshit we have to put up with.
    The video will make for some solid night time listening.
    If I don’t fall asleep first.

      1. *
        THE GUNS JUSTIN WON’T BE FREEZING

        “Meanwhile, the House of Commons is still considering BILL C-5, an act that would
        REPEAL A HOST OF MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES, including those for
        smuggling firearms. The idea is to reduce the ‘overincarceration rate of Indigenous
        peoples’ as well as for other ‘MARGINALIZED CANADIANS.'”

        *

  6. The really scary thing is that the rest of her force doesn’t know much about firearms laws, or the safe handling of firearms either. Ever seen the RCMP practice shooting? Now that is scary.

    1. Chris, Yep it is scary. I’m only surprised that they don’t shoot one another more than they do.

  7. If you are a member of the police, you do not have to have a RPAL, nor go through the safety training that is required to get the RPAL in the first place. There are some forces that explicitly tell their members to not get a RPAL.

    1. That is true for their service firearms while on duty. No public agent is required to comply with the Firearms Act. if they own a firearm privately then they need an licence.

  8. Did Elizabeth May sit in for RCMP Commissioner Lucki at the MCC? When the head of our national police force testifies at a commission of inquiry I expect the Commissioner to testify, not some civilian. Is she now ashamed to wear her uniform?

  9. The head of the Jagderp Turdhole Gestapo… no brain required.

    This country is so corrupt it is beyond repair.

  11. L – At 34 pages of Criminal Code offences and 38+? pages of Regulations, also crimes, most
    of which have been in effect for over 2 decades. Why would having a basic understanding
    of the most Byzantine, convoluted, but politically correct legislation (which violated the traditional Common-Law rights of Canadians), be expected of the “top” cop in Canada?

    After all, gun “control” has been the Liberal’s star criminal policy since 1995(C-68), in their attempt to outdo the Progressive Conservatives(Mulroney) 1991 C-17 and so is now accepted
    by all mainstream political parties.

    If being able to understand and knowing Canada’s Criminal Code and Regulations, regarding firearms, was on a test to pass in order to become a police officer/R.C.M.P. officer. Then very few would qualify, nor would very many lawyers either, and pretty much zero politicians.

    The mens rea, the guilty mind was the most important part of the investigation in criminal violence. That is until Cult. Marxism infiltrated legal theory and criminal violence had a cause,
    a systemic one, outside and independent of the perpetrator’s control. Who thus became the victim of the crime.

    Policing used to be about protecting society from crimes that actually harmed people or stole or damaged their property; things that violated individual rights to life, security of the person and property. Street cops understand that as well as anyone. Law abiding citizens agreed and a close working relationship ensued, a sign of a healthy body politic. Cult. Marxism has been the brain parasite infecting the body politic for decades.

    The largest massacre in Canada’s history raises many questions:about the alternative income($425,000 cash payment approved officially by ?) and the perp’s mysterious protected status from investigation over the years.

    In 21st Canada, truck drivers can’t drive, doctors can’t doctor and police can no longer police. That is live up to: To Serve and Protect. The government of the day has other priorities.

    1. Shorter version.
      In the medieval system of government, the divine right of kings is observed and never questioned.
      No matter how stupid or inbred the sovereign.

  12. Shrug. If you’re the Commissioner or Chief of any large Canadian police force, it’s certainly not your knowledge or investigative skills that got you to the top.

    A lot of them couldn’t find a Jew in Israel … but they’d sure know how to bow and face Mecca.

    1. “Shrug. If you’re the Commissioner or Chief of any large Canadian police force, it’s certainly not your knowledge or investigative skills that got you to the top. ”

      That’s why I always laugh when someone tries to justify Canada’s “gun control” laws by repeating that the “police chiefs” all support it. Well of course they do…they are political appointees, and as such will support whatever their *bosses* tell them to support.

    2. She doesn’t even have to, or want to, wear the uniform of the force she supposedly “leads.”

      Then again, the only worth that a RCMP uniform currently has is as a Disney fetish costume.

  13. Does she have a degree in literature like the female who was in charge of the covid thingamabob gimmick?

  14. Laws?
    Those are for the little people.
    We have been living this idiotcracy for decades now.
    Rule makers who have no idea what they are regulating.
    Regulators with no idea of what the rules are.
    Rules for thee but not for my cousin see.
    Of course this Liberal Appointee has no idea what the laws are..
    It is a Liberal.

    1. In a system of patronage all that is required for advancement is pleasing the patron.
      No different for a corral of horses, or a house of horses.

  15. Looks like THEY occasionally and when possible, pick people–Liberals, of course, based on what their surnames are. It’s seems really that simple and shallow. My guess, you see, that is, after they’ve picked the right gender of person they want.

    Think about it: Brenda Lucki aka Bring Luck, (for them– to please their masters), Me-la-nie Joli aka Me-the-Born Pretty; guess the meaning of some others… I won’t go there, but a great game to play with while waiting in a vast line up somewhere with your precious phone losing juice.

    Butt and Freeland: hmmm…aka all free for them, not us…

  17. I had no idea until now that Wendy Cukier and Brenda Lucki had been separated at birth.

    I mean neither one knows anything about fire arms so, just saying saying.

  18. Our fellow countrymen voted for this joke of a government ‘because it’s 2015!’.
    That and the inbred Marxists reading ‘The News’ to them told them that Stephen Harper was frightening.

    Remind them about that.

  20. some in here are just realizing that cops don’t not, and are not hired to serve us tax payers. They serve only their political masters who sigh their pay checks, which represent our tax dollars. And the more we just slag and demean cops, the more they are driven to only serve their political masters . Are you anti cop morons reading in here?

    1. Gym:

      I’ll help you out with your thinking.

      The police represent institutionalized force. The weight of the government, it’s laws and regulations, juxtaposed against the rights of the individual.
      They are hired to do the governments bidding. They are told to march and they march.

      They are not your friend.

    2. “some in here are just realizing…”

      “… others here do not realize that there is a difference between choosing to serve your political masters and slavery. They made their choice, hence they are complicit.

    1. *
      THE WAGES OF WOKE

      The female RCMP officer killed by Gabriel Wortman out in Nova Scotia
      was a diversity hire who spent the lion’s share of her career with the
      Musical Ride      . She was planning on spending the last few years of her
      ‘career’ in a quiet rural setting. She was never a line cop which obviously
      contributed to her death at the hands of a psychotic yet untrained cop
      wannabe denturist.

      *

  22. Lucki cuts a pathetic figure on the stand.

    As the head of the rcmp she obfuscates and confounds every question and questionnaire. She is not culpable, bears no responsibility for what happened. Same answers at every inquiry. “We have try harder. We have to do better”.

    But do they get better or try harder? Never. It’s the same thing every time. Nothing changes whether it’s Mayerthorpe or Nova Scotia. The rcmp fits the definition of insanity. They continue to do the same thing over and over expecting a different outcome.

    Here in Alberta we are engaged in a debate over the future of rcmp policing. Poles suggest a majority of citizens want to retain the services of the rcmp. The rcmp does not police one major city in all of Canada let alone Alberta. My guess is if you poled only rural residents the results would be quite different. You really can’t understand the inadequacies and shortcomings of the rcmp unless you are subject to them. They are lousy at municipal policing. They don’t measure up.

    All this comes light each time one of these events takes place. Then the same old excuses are rolled out. Everytime.

  23. OK, pvc pipe and caps, desicants ,red grease,shovel. Cash or card? Cash it is. Thank you have a nice day.

  24. She’s following in the line of a fair few others in ze gov. Getting a position of authority doesn’t mean = under the Lieberals – one actually has to be competent and actually seek to understand what one’s duties are.
    Offspring came home talking about boss who – after a fairly heated exchange with someone at CRA – was pushing out a fair few expletive deleteds. Turned out boss (head of tax department for their firm) had been in discussion with a CRA rep who has just denied a client’s appeal (do not know the details). Boss pressed for details as to why appeal denied – as in just where in the Income Tax Act (wanting chapter and verse here) can you justify this denial, only to get the response – and I’m paraphrasing here – that the CRA rep had not read the ITA, did not understand the ITA, and was relying on bullet points supplied by whomever further up the food chain. Even I can read the ITA to a certain extent, though I still maintain it’s not written in either official language, but offspring took three years (admittedly part-time) to read and understand the Act. If it’s required for our jobs, so should it be the same for federal employees.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation