30 Replies to “Nothing to see here!”

  1. The officer in question has, as part of her duties, “Child Abuse.”
    Seems to fit the investigative job description, even though other officers were turning a blind eye.
    What did we used to call those people who bucked the system and went beyond the line in search of truth?
    Oh, yeah….heroes.

  2. So cops can be charged with misconduct for… looking for evidence of a crime? And this detective has been suspended since February because she looked for evidence of a crime in other cases?

    Okay then.

      1. To many dropping dead and team blue line is given a warning to shut up and do your job no questions asked…

  3. I’d rather a cop give us their two cents…seriously.
    The Ottawa Police Force is a shitshow and has been for decades.
    I have workmates who when they were teenagers would get stopped by the Po-po, have their pot taken and…yeah those guys are gone, but many have been replaced by worse.
    If they are the norm, I’m surprised there isn’t more cop on cop violence.
    Anyone who fcks with kids or allows others to is pig food.

  4. I’m thinking we’ll see a little more curiosity if politicians, the cops and their families start suddenly dropping dead.

    Of course the shot is in no way responsible for the sudden deaths. And on a completely unrelated topic, here’s a 14 second video of the Saudi Ambassador to Egypt talking at a conference and then dropping dead. Like dead….dead.

    https://twitter.com/aNdr0iz/status/1557136518229139456?s=20

  5. Misconduct that results in real results that may help people is verboten.
    Misconduct that results in little old ladies being trampled by horses is fine.

    Go through the codes of conduct for the OPS, and compare it to what they did to the Freedom Convoy. This is pure selective persecution.

  6. This police officer stupidly did her investigation without informing the lead officer on the infant death case. She deserves what she gets. If she had half a brain she would have sought permission to insert herself into the investigation and then proceeded. If they say “NO” then you take it to internal affairs and up the ladder within the department (being careful to follow all the rules).

    If they still block the investigation as to determining a correlation between the deaths and the “vaccination”…and you are willing to sacrifice your own comfort to pursue it…you go to the press (knowing full well that your career is likely over at that point).

    The moral of the story is that when you are dealing with such a hot political football within a police department you handle yourself as impeccably as possible. You don’t break the internal rules and expect that to be overlooked.

    1. FO.
      They broke internal rules by the truckload to abuse the Freedom Convoy.
      You are defending the indefensible.

          1. Ah, I see. So, the chosen response to how things work in an organized work setting can be dismissed by telling the individual who points that out to “FO.” Cute. And, immature.

            It’s entirely possible that this police officer could have made a difference and brought suspected thoughts to merit. But, instead she acted improperly. As a result, her endeavor won’t be realized and she’ll be penalized. And, like I said…she deserves it if what is reported in that article is accurate. She totally screwed up.

    2. I agree. Cover your ass first. As to HiHo’s take on it, one doesn’t excuse the other. Noting that the Ottawa police (and others) trampled all over citizen’s rights hardly excuses this officer for doing the same. Probing into personal medical history is NOT part of her job.
      …just to be clear, I hate the ‘jab’ as much as the next guy, and all the bureaucrats and professionals who enabled this should rot in Hell.

    3. Where your point obviously went well over at least one person’s head, I get where you are coming from, Orson. I had a similar reaction after reading some of the details.

      The righteousness of what she was attempting aside, she made it far too easy for the establishment to shut her down by breaking some pretty basic rules. Simply highlighting that fact is hardly defending the Ottawa Pig Dept..

      BTW… I suspect “FO” means “Fine Observation!” 😉

      1. Anyone who thinks police don’t rampantly abuse the databases they have access to all the time, with the full knowledge and tacit approval of the department, is naive. I’ve known multiple women who bragged of having friends in the police department who would run criminal record checks on their prospective dates.

        This is purely punitive because of The Narrative.

        1. Spot on RD. If you have a friend who is a mountie, and you need a record check, done in 5 minutes, with no risk to the officer.

    4. Yes, these days everything seems to be running “by the book”. All truth, all the time. Everyone looking for transparency and efficiency in getting to the bottom of questions that are piling up faster than the bodies of our heathy young people and children. Dotting the eyes, crossing the tees will get us there in no time.
      Eye roll.

  7. internal rules

    That’s the fn problem…

    Like the internal rules our legal drug pushing dealing doctors follow since the Jamestown Koolaid Shots…

    Never mind the 338 MP’s in Ottawa that didn’t lift a finger until the Truckers started rolling using Parliaments Internal Rules to hide their murderous depopulation ways…

    Those internal rules are there so the can control the information and who and who doesn’t get access to it…

    All corrupt to the core cause they chose power and money in exchange for their souls…

    They cared more for their today’s then their tomorrow’s…

    Fools

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7oZsyJgNVnQ

  8. In case you didn’t notice they are handing out medals.. We did a good job if you know what I mean..

  9. My only comment would be – garbage. This fake news tells me nothing of what’s happening or happened to this cop. Stop listening, reading or watching. Framing a story that officials are punishing a ‘questioner’ will be about as successful as raiding a former president’s home.
    What I do know is people are dying today at higher rates than the last 70 years, that’s not disputable.

  10. “After the sudden or unexpected death of an infant or child, the office of the chief coroner will investigate to determine the cause of death and often make recommendations aimed at preventing similar deaths in the future. Police investigate such deaths, but their investigations focus on determining if criminality has played a role.”

    Yeah well maybe it has, you morons.

  11. Who the hell knows. I don’t trust the police. I don’t trust the media. I don’t trust the vaccine.

  12. The Ottawa police were among the last to to make the Jonestown Jab mandatory. I’m sure vaccine hesitancy, avoidance and regret is as common there as anywhere. The real story is that she has been disciplined (if her research had made the jab look good, she’d be called a hero).

    1. If this woman had managed to proceed, unnoticed and found something too damning, her discipline would be winding up dead.

  13. My rules; and the rules for others. Punishments for us; and punishments for others.

  14. She was looking into the status of the parents. She might have been fishing to see if she could charge the parents for abuse for *not* taking the shot. Don’t presume she was looking to link vax status of kids to deaths and ferret out the truth…

Navigation