39 Replies to “Shut Up You Crazy Depopulation Conspiracy Nutz”

  1. Very interesting – and perhaps with an element of truth.
    Illustrates quite clearly the ideology of some people, one that wishes to create a 5/95 society (have/have-not), with no bothersome middle-class.

  2. Well when they start off with:

    “The Benefits of Hunger”. ..???

    You know you are dealing with de-facto NAZI’s.
    Nothing else fits.

    2. It’s poorly done satire. He’s a globalist who thinks the UN, or more likely the upcoming world government, can solve world hunger. A socialist utopian global government won’t be as wonderful as he thinks but that’s a different matter. If you’ve read his lame article to the end and think he’s advocating keeping people hungry, then either you read too quickly or you’re clueless. Here’s the final paragraph:

      For those of us at the high end of the social ladder, ending hunger globally would be a disaster. If there were no hunger in the world, who would plow the fields? Who would harvest our vegetables? Who would work in the rendering plants? Who would clean our toilets? We would have to produce our own food and clean our own toilets. No wonder people at the high end are not rushing to solve the hunger problem. For many of us, hunger is not a problem, but an asset.

      You thought this was what he really believes?

      1. Well, Ya coulda fooled me! I read the entire thing, and I believed he was being sincere… a sincere Bolshevik, Czar, Communist, Fascist, WEF, or whatever you want to call a slave-owner these days.

        I could be wrong, but really… it’s hard to tell the good guys from the bad guys without a program now, isn’t it?

        1. Well, that was fast. The UN just deleted the article. Too many people, who don’t read carefully, outside the UN building with pitchforks, I suppose. Anyway part of the blurb about George Kent on the UN article has been conveniently cut off on this SDA post. The missing part says:

          He has written several books. The latest is FREEDOM FROM WANT The Human Right to Adequate Food

          Does that sound like somebody who wants to starve people? He thinks everyone in the world has a right to be fed—even if they don’t work?—and the way to do this is via world governance. He’s a utopian dreamer and that never ends well.

          You can see the blurb in full as it appeared on the UN article without the last two lines cut off, if you’re interested. It also includes an explanation of how this is satire in case you need it.
          https://www.opindia.com/2022/07/article-describing-benefits-of-world-hunger-published-by-the-un-goes-viral/

          1. I will say it again… It’s difficult to tell the good guys from the bad. I commend George Kent for wanting to end hunger, but I condemn his means for ending it.
            Yeah, I noticed that the article was scrubbed, but someone did archive it. I saw it somewhere, but didn’t bother to dig it up. The article was garbage, to say the least, and wasn’t worth the time or energy to preserve it.

      2. One more thing. There are lots of people who think some suffering by ordinary people may be necessary to bring about the utopian new world order, and Klaus Schwab and the elitists at the WEF seem to be among them. Here’s another one from the Biden administration:

        CNN: “What do you say to those families that say, ‘listen, we can’t afford to pay $4.85 a gallon for months, if not years?’”
        BIDEN ADVISOR BRIAN DEESE: “This is about the future of the Liberal World Order and we have to stand firm.”
        https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/07/hauteur-with-a-twist-of-deceit.php

        George Kent doesn’t seem to be that type of heartless schemer. He’s a utopian dreamer who thinks world government can bring this about relatively painlessly. Not only is he a lousy writer of satire, he’s hopelessly unrealistic.

        1. I saw that clip, and that was worth preserving. We are definitely in a war, but the enemy isn’t a foreign country. The enemy is our very own governments.
          (Oh, sorry, CSIS… I didn’t realize you were listening in. Oh, hey there, RCMP! How’s it going? How was the coffee and doughnuts this morning?)
          Any day now… sirens are going to blare, and guns will be drawn outside my front door.

  3. Just think, without mass starvation, the elites would have to acquaint themselves with a toilet brush. Kinda makes all those malnourished children a plus, doesn’t it? (Oopsie, just overloaded and broke the sarcasm meter)

  5. This has got to be satire at the “A Modest Proposal” level.

    If not, then such an inhumane policy is on par with eugenics thinking of the early 20th century. The philosophy of keeping people hungry to make them work harder are the inner thoughts of megalomaniac psychopaths. Trading labor for cash is normal but a policy of poverty wages being optimal for productivity is a bizarre and cold blooded calculation. The type of people promoting such a twisted idea would certainly want to expand it beyond third world manual labor.

    1. If you read through the end, it’s not satire, but it is a rebuke to those at top. Ironic, that it’s on a UN website, as hunger is an issue that keeps the unelected fat cats at the top, jetsetting across the world to beautiful locations for meet and greets and thousand dollar a plate soirees.

      “No wonder people at the high end are not rushing to solve the hunger problem. For many of us, hunger is not a problem, but an asset.”

      And a rebuke to “renewable energy”.
      “For example, an article reports on “Brazil’s ethanol slaves: 200,000 migrant sugar cutters who prop up renewable energy boom”.
      He’ll be out of a job and scrubbed from that website soon.

      1. Yeah, it’s hard to tell if the writer is being sincere or engaging in mischief. Cheekily saying what can’t be said about official UN policies that keep people in poverty because of ulterior motives of people who profit on the backs of the poorest.

        Can you imagine someone writing something similar about human trafficking. Keeping the women hungry promotes them to work in our brothels.

      2. It’s written as a rebuke to the wealthy west is how I took it. We need 3rd world ppl to be hungry for our benefit. It’s a guilt trip attempt to prod more action out of people.

        1. @John Thanks for summarizing his article so accurately in just a few words. I’m amazed that the vast majority of commenters here completely misunderstood what Kent wrote. They either read it and failed to comprehend his very simple message—due to his use of obvious sarcasm—or they commented on it without reading it which is also inexcusable. Is this the level of understanding of most people on the internet? I’m afraid so.

          Now the UN has taken the article down which is also foolish because it just gives the wrongheaded conspiracy theorists—like Infowars which is promoting this story as evidence of a plot to starve the poor people of the world—more fuel for the fire. Why not just update it with a heading that it’s satire not meant to be taken literally?

          Anyway the original article is still available here for the time being at least:
          https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297751609_The_benefits_of_world_hunger

      3. It’s not a bad article as slightly subversive satire, but really he could list a thousand ways the green agenda will inevitably cause mass starvation. Sri Lanka appears to be ahead of the curve but the rest of the world isn’t far behind (looking at you, Holland). I think people will be amazed at how rapidly food dwindles as we continue this mad transition from fossil fuels to nothing much.

  6. Let’s start by replacing those sumptuous UN banquet feasts with a bucket of grubs.

  7. He said the quiet part out loud.
    How reassuring to have someone who could pen these words focusing on human rights.

    “For those of us at the high end of the social ladder, ending hunger globally would be a disaster. If there were no hunger in the world, who would plow the fields? Who would harvest our vegetables? Who would work in the rendering plants? Who would clean our toilets?”

    Believing that the only motivation for performing productive work is hunger and deprivation, and that those must be maintained in order to ensure the continuance of the lifestyles of the rich and famous represents the pinnacle of ignorance, as so commonly seen in the “governing class.” Be assured, this is what most well-fed entitled liberals believe about working class deplorables; and they are poorer for it, as they will never experience the satisfaction of a hard day’s work done well.

    Exactly the kind of thinking we observe in Joe Biden when he expresses his total lack of concern for the hardships that the elevated gas prices (for which he is entirely responsible) are causing for working class Americans.

  8. What causes hunger? The same thing that causes poverty and war and sickness – it’s the natural human condition. The question is: what causes peace and plenty? Socialists believe Man in Nature would live as if in a Garden of Eden with all good things just falling from the sky, anyone with a lick of sense knows life is a constant struggle and there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch. The question isn’t why there are starving children in Africa, the question is why there are no starving children in the West.

    1. The problem with the garden of eden is that there is only room for two people.

  9. https://youtu.be/dRYg2mvT_Ow?t=101

    Used to worry about the poor
    But I don’t worry anymore
    Used to worry about the black man
    Now I don’t worry about the black man
    Used to worry about the starving children of India
    You know what I say now about the starving children of India?
    I say, “Ohhhhhhhhhh mammmmmaaaaa”

  10. Under-nourished people do are not able to work hard for long. They are prone to sickness and disease, they will die young. A life as a best of burden is not a life. Their short lives are nothing but exploitation and misery.

    2. Yep, so I think anyone who makes this type of proposal should “put their money where their mouth is” so to speak. They should be willing to live the lifestyle they seek to impose on others.

      In this case, George Kent should be required work for subsidence-only level food for a couple of years.

      Those promoting bugs for food should be given only insect protein for a few years.

      Those who want green energy should only get electricity when the wind or solar generator nearest their home is running…so about 20-30% of the time.

      Those who want a surveillance state should have all of their personal information collected and released to the public because that’s where everyone else’s data will end up if they anger the ruling class.

  11. Hmmmm…admittedly it piqued my interest – finally an idea that might make haranguing from world hunger industry jag offs like Bono and Geldof a thing of the past.

  12. Well there’s a ballsy article. Thus I suspect it will be retracted by the UN.

    And I’m not sure I agree with it. Most people in the developed world grow up with no fear of hunger whatsoever. They take it for granted that they will always have enough to eat. And yet many are still driven to work hard for reasons of self fulfillment, social prestige, and a drive to provide good things for their family and themselves.

  14. Of course the global elites are fine with the peasants starving and suffering as they dine like kings on the public’s dime. They should be forced to live for five years under policies they shove down our throats, at the end of five years we’ll decide if we want to be ruled by liberal maggots.

  16. Yes, hunger is a good motivator. But Kent neglects to point out that culture is as well. I doubt that Musk works 18 hour days because he’s so hungry. Unfortunately, the joy and sense of accomplishment derived from work is denigrated by many (including our political elites).

    Glancing at reviews of a few of his other books, I’d say I agree with much of what he says. People have a right to food; any political or other move that jeopardizes that is criminal.

  17. Now that the left has effed the world up so badly we are actually facing food shortages.
    You’ll eat nothing and be happy.

  18. It’s not satire. It is the real goal of our ruling class. Keep them broke and busy ,throw in some fear and you have compliance. What we are experiencing now is the fact that the serfs have been doing to well and are getting unruly, so they need to be taught their place.

  19. The corrupt Liberals are announcing that there will be more vaccine mandates.
    Regular boosters will be enforced.
    Which means that an example will be needed to be set for anyone who is vaccinated but is getting wobbly about getting periodic boosters.
    In other words those not already vaccinated will receive some new torture from the Liberal/NDP junta as a lesson for those vaxxed who may be considering refusing.

  20. The link no longer works (or at least, I can’t get it to work).

    They must have determined that their outright fascism was showing.

    “Who’s a Nazi?”

    ” Those of you who want to designate a segment of the population as a permanent underclass.”

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation