Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
“The goal was to ensure that, no matter what the emergency, a U.S. Navy submarine’s hull would maintain structural integrity under pressure and the sub would at least be able to surface.”
Baaahh, that’s nothing. At about the same time the RCN insisted on an even better policy to ensure its subs would be absolutely sink-proof.
They stay in drydock.
I worked on it before it transfered to the Pacific and helped with the design process for the conversion.
DERise – wow, SDA really does have a wide readership. Where was was the conversion / retrofit carried out?
Norfolk Naval Shipyard
Jamie…
Lmao, so true…. Typical Canadian military purchase. Buy old worn out shit and never use it as an effective weapons platform…and the boys are still using an 80 year old side arm…as they wave to 65 year old F-18A’s…all the While spending millions on an overflowing officer corps to look after maybe 12,000 actual Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen.
Precisely what FRENCH LIBERALS prefer…. Non combatant capable “armed” forces.
The decrepitude of the CF can be blamed on both parties and the aphaty of the average Canuck.
Au contraire….
Canada has a military designed to put down civil disobedience.
Why do you think Socks hates Ar15s.
There’s more ARs in civie hands than C7s in gov stocks.
Add another 50000 sks, etc
OK so what use is a frigate or an f-18 to put down civil desobidience? Seems the cops have pretty good gear in that department. Including functioning sidearms.
Don’t forget the trampling horses!
Au contraire….
Canada has a military designed to put down civil disobedience.
Why do you think Socks hates Ar15s.
There’s more ARs in civie hands than C7s in gov stocks.
Add another 50000 sks, etc
A good article but quite wrong about Thresher. The cause of its loss has been well known for decades.
How about on deep dive trials. Max + 13. An implosion no time to react.
They got a leak in between the primary and secondary hulls. A few hundred tons of water got in. The water acted as leverage tilting the boat downward. While trying to reverse, the reactor overheated and its shutdown system turned it off. No power. They then went down to pressure depth and imploded.
This is why all submarines have a switch that disengages all reactor automatic shutdown systems. In a submarine, there are much worse things than an overheating reactor. It’s also why no one builds submarines as long, thin needles.
Something similar happened recently in the sotub China sea. The front of the American sub broke off. They had to travel the pacific on the surface which is a terrible way to go, subs will rock and and forth badly on the surface at any speed.
It seems US subs are in the habit of smashing into large undersea objects!
https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/04/asia/submarine-uss-connecticut-accident-undersea-mountain-hnk-intl-ml-dst/index.html
https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/harbor-12132021135740.html
Tangentially related, the USS Pittsburgh had a bit of a go in a typhoon in 1945
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USS_Pittsburgh_(CA-72)_underway_after_she_lost_her_bow_in_June_1945.jpg
The Royal Navy did it in 1960; https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/submarine-hits-anchorite-rock_topic61908.html