You Don’t Say

Study shows hydroxychloroquine and zinc treatments increased coronavirus survival rate by almost three times

The observational study, published by medRxiv, found that antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine, along with zinc, could increase the coronavirus survival rate by as much as nearly 200% if distributed at higher doses to ventilated patients with a severe version of the illness.

“We found that when the cumulative doses of two drugs, HCQ and AZM, were above a certain level, patients had a survival rate 2.9 times the other patients,” the study’s conclusion states.

And when did they figure this out?

Saint Barnabas Medical Center is a 557-bed, teaching medical center in Livingston, New Jersey. Using the hospital’s discharge coding data, we identified 255 Covid patients, who were admitted by May 1, 2020 and required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Ethical approval for the study was granted by the hospital’s Institutional Review Board.

Apparently observational studies don’t count. Or so we’re being told.

15 Replies to “You Don’t Say”

  1. “But, Orange Man endorsed it. Therefore we must condemn it.” Thus says the Left.

  2. Character assassination on John Inglis (Executive Director of one of the affiliation entities involved in the study) in 5-4-3-2-1…

    Soon to be called the “fish tank cleaner killer.”

  3. Imagine the improved survival rates if they issued those medications before the patients needed to be put on ventilators.

  4. It seems to be an Iron Law that, if TPTB say something is true, the exact opposite is in fact the truth.

    What a sad world we’ve turned into.

  5. On a related note, remember when Trump talked about sunlight and UV light being a great disinfectant, and he pondered if there was a way to inject it into the lungs, and then the MSM ran with the story that Trump said we should inject disinfectants? Well here’s the UV disinfectant lung injection tech: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210309/Ultraviolet-light-therapy-reduces-viral-load-in-critically-ill-COVID-19-patients.aspx

    Here’s Trump’s original comment:
    A question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So, supposedly we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light, and I think you said that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way. And I think you said you’re going to test that too. Sounds interesting, right? And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds interesting to me. So, we’ll see, but the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute. That’s pretty powerful.

    1. No, no, no science is always settled by the left. They just settle it at different place at different times. That, and we have always been at war with Eastasia.

    1. One more problem, statistically illiterate morons like you should not be grasping for straws nor pretending to have an informed opinion.

  6. Ordinarily, I am VERY skeptical of “Clinical Trials” as touted by the latest quackery. But those sorts of “clinical trials” consist primarily of patients telling interviewers that they “felt” better after taking such and such, or doing so or so …

    When the “clinical trial” consists of either: a) living or, b) dying … I sit up and take notice. Fast.

  7. Please, please, please don’t ever stop posting studies like these as “evidence” in support of your views on the various aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Your inability to discern high- vs low-quality scientific research is, all by itself, a far more effective and efficient means of discrediting your arguments than anything one could write as a rebuttal here in the comments section.

    1. Just to clarify here “Ted”.’Whats the context?
      Who are you addressing?
      Or do I read you right?And you want the job as “Central Scrutinizer”.

  8. This is where our “leaders” are vulnerable to Class Action lawsuits.
    They knew long ago that Ivermectin, HCQ, Vitamin D etc all helped suppress and control COVID and it would have kept people out of the hospital eliminating the lock downs, masks, distancing.
    Had those drugs been promoted the first lockdown would have only been the only one as little was known.
    Thousands of businesses destroyed, thousands of dead, all avoidable.
    The politicians and bureaucrats pushing an agenda should cost them their careers and whatever assets they have, if not out right sent to prison for life.
    A conviction for breaking the Nuremberg Code is death is death by the way.

Navigation