Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
“and then they came for me”.
The fact is that the “twitter crowd” has no power, ZERO – without the backing of traitorous “adults” that run the system.
Exactly. Those traitorous adults are the career politicians who need to protect their office by pandering to the noisy mob. Ridding the political system of career politicians via term-limits would be a sensible starting point, and possibly the only way to salvage what remains of western democracy.
This is where fascist diktat comes from.
How is it that they don’t look in the mirror.
Interesting. I can’t see any proper grounds for dismissal. Silly fellow had an excellent damages claim until he resigned. His employment contract will undoubtedly confirm that.
Imagine the left resigning because former students didn’t like factual data. 🙂
The charge …the professor touted Michigan State research that found police are not more likely to shoot African-Americans.
The real crime …sharing content on genetic differences among different races.
The intent …a chilling effect on academic freedom…
Why would the UNION & Administration not be sued…..Malicious intent has consequences…. He has SOME time to make a claim for financial damages & only a fool would not have damages….
Much better case for damages had he been fired. Resigned opens a likely indeterminate ‘he said she said’ case.
No guts, no glory.
Another victory by the mob. This is our anti-intellectual universities these days.
The Bible does tell us that we shall know the truth and the truth shall set us free. I somehow think that the latter part didn’t mean being out of a job.
Defund universities.
Bingo!
There’s my vote.
I think you’re forgetting what a burden that would put on the psychiatric community.
Whatever would all those snowflakes do?
Sure sounds like he should press charges of anti-Asian discrimination with federal authorities plus sue them for $100 million for blatant racism in firing.
You can use racism(diversity) in hiring.
You can use racism in student selection(affirmative action).
Asians are barely ahead of White people on the racism expiation scale.
For a winning case he needs an identity boost.
Maybe some lesbian or trans self-identification.
Or a Democrat membership card.
Just like HRC kangaroo courts. “The truth is no defence.”
They accused him of, “Scientific Racism”, What the hell is that? We are truly screwed!
They also stated, they removed Hsu for… “Controversial views, or, for inquiring about controversial topics, or for simply talking to controversial personalities…would also set a dangerous precedent inconsistent with the fundamental principles of “Modern Enlightened Higher Education”… Which I presume is educational doublespeak for “Coloring outside the lines of permitted norms”. Surely, the place for rational dialogue on any topic, but especially controversial ones, I would have thought to be, in the universities!
Plus that last part about being, “Inconsistent with the fundamental principles of MODERN ENLIGHTENED EDUCATION” I also presume to mean, the dumbing down, and indoctrination of students into the leftist causes! In the next decade or two, these carefully educated students will be in positions of power in the real world. So yes, we are indeed royally screwed! Glad I won’t be around for that.