The TV documentary series Mayday also reports claims in Season 9 Episode 3 that the flight recorder might have been tampered with and indicated that four seconds had been cut from the tape; this was shown by playing back a control tower tape and comparing it to the remaining tape. The pilot argues that he attempted to apply thrust earlier than indicated in the flight recorder data. When he increased throttle to level off at 100 ft, the engines did not respond. The pilot claims that this indicated a problem with the aeroplane’s fly-by-wire system rather than pilot error. After a few seconds he got worried and thought there may have been something like a short circuit in the completely computerised throttle control and responded by pulling the throttle all the way back then forward again. By that time the aircraft had touched the trees. The show also looks at the theory that it was the computer at fault, not the pilots. Because the aircraft’s altitude had fallen below 100 ft, the plane’s computers were programmed to believe it was landing and therefore they would not allow any drastic manoeuvres from either pilot. When the crew suddenly asked the plane for more power and lift, it simply ignored them.7]
It was also claimed by the Institute of Police Forensic Evidence and Criminology, based in Lausanne, Switzerland, that the flight data recorders may have been switched and were not the original ones in the aeroplane.[7][8] Airbus made a detailed rebuttal of these claims in a document published in 1991.[9] Airbus contends that the independent investigator employed by the filmmakers made an error when synchronising the recordings based on a misunderstanding of how the “Radio Transmit” parameter on the flight data recorder functioned.
A I, ok, let’s see it fix the problem, any problem.
I believe that A I is designed to seek out patterns (and new civilizations, to boldly go where no man, er, person, er, er).
Thinking is likely hard to program. Hence, new problems remain problems!
Man vs Machine.
A320 Airbus Down (France 1988)
https://youtu.be/I9gELPxPG8Q
Not sure how much faith to put in this
http://www.crashdehabsheim.net/CRenglish%20phot.pdf
“Alternative explanation”