3 Replies to “We Don’t Need No Flaming Sparky Cars”

  1. CO2 is not a problem anywhere unless we really screw up and somehow manage to drop it to the point where we all die because it is too low.

  2. OWG. I agree with you a hundred percent.

    CO2 is a necessity to life and is not pollution. Think of all the wasted time and money spent on this issue over the last 2 decades.

    Mind you if we didn’t have this indoctrination they would have been a million social scientists, reporters, and politicians and half the United Nations staff on Welfare and the Dole. They are not qualified to do anything positive or build anything.

    CO2 is a non issue. Check the REAL Science

  3. Lomborg accepts the highly likely proposition that there is “some” AGW. That is where he parts company with the hysteria pimps, one world governance, liberty-killing socialists and anti-industrial zealots. He looks at practical solutions in terms that don’t mean wiping out most humans on the planet nor killing prosperity. Most greens can’t accept science, let alone economics whereas Lomborg utilizes both. IOW, he will be ignored or marginalized by the institutional left (even though he is politically a lefty) and only exist as a resource for the “deplorables”.

Navigation