Weblog Awards
Best Canadian Blog
2004 - 2007
Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage
email Kate
(goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
I am not a registered charity. I cannot issue tax receipts.
Want lies?
Hire a regular consultant.
Want truth?
Hire an asshole.
The Pence Principle
Poor Richard's Retirement
Pilgrim's Progress
Trump The Establishment
“For what? It won’t improve public safety at all because it won’t do anything to take guns away from criminals.”
Look two posts down. “He admires their basic dictatorship.”
No, no, no … banning guns WILL DEFINATELY improve safety. It will improve the safety of each and every First Nations burgler who might have otherwise been shot in the act of breaking, entering, and attempting rape. Now, these proud young scavengers will live to commit another crime.
I love the recurring theme of assault weapons. I suspect only a small handful of grandfathered Canadians might own actual assault rifles. Many own guns that look like assault rifles. For the record – looks CAN”T kill.
scar, ASSault weapons is a play on emotions, and McTurd’s advisor, david axelrod like the “emotional” approach in politics. It gave us O’Butthole and PeeHair. PeeHair is trying to emotionalize the next election also, and this is part of it. My good friend of mine, after denigrating Trump over O’Butt’s caged kids, went on to say automatic weapons should be banned. Of course he was shocked when I told him they were already banned. Ignorance of facts, on both sides of the aisle, is of benefit to libtards.
Gum bans appeal to people in highly urbanized localls who have never had any experience with guns. Those areas also happen to be close to the illegal handgun activity that scares them, so to them, the idea of a ban appeals to their fears. They don’t think past the fear enough to know that the only guns banned will be those in the hands of the law abiding gun owners. Trudeau knows it won’t affect crime, but it will garner votes.
I suspect he’ll lose his majority with or without gun control promises, but his minority will be supported by the NDP and Greens who share anti-gun sentiment.
Not to mention that most urban gun homicides are thugs settling disputes with other thugs over money, drugs or whores.
It is laughably easy to steer clear of gun violence in Ottawa. All one need do is avoid the Byward Market after dark and Vanier and Lowertown at any time of the day, along with any restaurants in urban Ottawa frequented by visible minorities.
(The cheap and “authentic” cuisine is not worth it. Who was it said that immigration is how the trophy wives of rich liberals avoid learning how to cook?)
I’m sure readers in other cities can add their own lists of neighbourhoods to avoid if gunfire makes you squeamish.
You’re too funny …
Who was it said that immigration is how the trophy wives of rich liberals avoid learning how to cook?)
You make me laugh. It reminds me of how “Clueless” rich liberals actually are. Hollywood even mocks their Cluelessness …
https://youtu.be/NovgQDktBTo
Dirtman, see my post above. My fried has a small farming operation, owns a 222, to shoot coyotes and is a good bible thumper. And the good bible thumper defines the problem. This isn’t the first screw up of info for him.
If Jr Trudeau loses the next election it won’t be over guns. Most Canadians are completely apathetic about gun ownership or gun rights. Jr has so many negatives right now that gun ownership or gun rights won’t move the needle one way or the other. When he gets snubbed at the G20 grandpa ‘s goose gun isn’t going to lose him any support. Grandpa ain’t goin’ to vote fer him nohow.
Honestly I can’t see many legal gun owners voting Trudeau regardless of JT’s stance on gun control.
Just think of any gun owner you know who said I’d vote liberal if it wasn’t for their stance on guns.
Yeah that has never happened.
At best JT is pandering to his base and trying to court some greens / ndp.
At worst [insert one world order conspiracy theory here.]
PM PotatoSkin and the Corrupt Liberal Party of Canada are relying on the empty husks of urban women to continue their support and any anti-gun bill or promise will help.
It won’t change the mind of other non-owners as most Canadians don’t believe in property rights. They’ll fire out the “but you don’t need” line that always proves they’re an idiot.
cbc is doing their damnedest to get out the climate scared youth vote for Prancing Princess Petunia. All of them make me puke.
I don’t know of any rifle/shotgun/pistol owners that are not aware of anyone identifying as Liberal or NDP or Greens that isn’t fully aware that those parties are all anti gun. All of them.
Correct, a vote for any of them will give the same result, more government and more restrictions on basic freedom. Communism if you wish. We fought and died for the freedom I had as a young man and subsequent generations have flushed it all away. I hate those stupid, stupid people.
The National Post website has the story on the sleazy relationship between Irving Shipyards and the Liberal government.
What about Irving and Saudi Oil?
Irving needs to be legislated from buying Muslims Oil
It will either help Trudeau, or make no difference at all. There are not that many gun owners. Non gun owners either support the policy or don’t care one way or the other, and gun owners weren’t voting for him already.
I don’t think so…..he will lose his majority for being the most divisive, dishonest, corrupt, morally bankrupt, incompetent, hypocritical, new world order ideologue that has ever sat in the PM’s chair. Oh yeah….did I mention the India debacle? Did I mention he has publicly said he thinks that only someone from Quebec should be PM, and that he has also publicly said he really has no use for anyone from Western Canada?
Grant, you are going to have to come up with more reasons than that. He will be re-elected with a larger majority in October, unless he was down at Lolita Island. You probably would not want to be in Jeffrey Epstein’s little black book, with him being indicted. Even something like that probably would not make the news on Justin’s Sponsored Media in Canaduh.
He did go to Aga Khan’s island. With his old buddy Seamus. Didn’t/Won’t hear much more about that from media.
Doubtful hear much about it from Tory’s either, with that “people in glass houses…” thing. At the time, then-interim leader Ambrose issued a statement from a different billionaire’s yacht. Tories are perfectly happy with the powerless Ethics Commissioner remaining powerless
You are describing all on the left spectrum. That would be at least 60% of the Canadian electorate.
The results of this election will be determined by the numbers of NDP that don’t like their unlikable leader that either go Green or Liberal. A few (blue collar labour types) might even quietly vote Conservative or for Max. More generic “gun control” no mater how idiotic in nature, will not make much of a difference.
Cold dead hands.
Why not?
Hows the gun control going to hurt him
First its a climate armageddon now its guns?
If that doesn’t work, tell voters that there is an extreme right wing conspiracy afoot to ban abortion.
Wow Lilley may have actually gotten one right.
This is just desperate, and dumb too. I don’t have the link handy, but surveys in both America and Canada actually show less support for gun control amongst young cohorts (which is congruent with their more socially tolerant views). Gun control really didn’t hunt for the Liberals ten years ago. Why would it work better now?
Why would gun control work for the Liberals?
Gun control doesn’t have to appeal to a majority of voters; those who are not in favour of gun control were never going to vote Liberal. All the liberals want is to appeal to a small number of people mostly women, who might vote Liberal because of this issue. Even if it’s get 5% of the voting public, it will produce results for team Turdeau in selected tidings.
Same with abortion. I’m guessing, but about 40% of the population don’t follow politics, even in an election year. They wouldn’t know that Scheer has said he won’t bring in anti-abortion legislation. I think Bernier may have a similar position. But the liberals will keep hammering “conservatives want to end abortion, just like they are doing in some US states.”
Although the abortion issue has been settled for years in Canada, the Liberals are playing this card again. It’s in an attempt to get a small number of non-voters to vote Liberal. The measure of the effectiveness is not whether it changes the vote of a majority of Canadians, it won’t. But rather it will work if it gets an additional 1 to 2% of the population to vote Liberal.
Joe, unDork does not understand human behavior, nor is he mathematically literate, so statistics fly over it’s head.
From the article:
“The problem is, Blair wasn’t talking about handguns, he was talking about rifles.”
F*** you and the retarded horse you humped while writing this.
Handguns are not a problem. Not anymore than screwdrivers on the streets of London England are. Low IQ gangbangers are a problem. Period. Full stop. End of story.
Colon, going full unDork today are you? Lilley never said hand guns were the problem, nor did he even fake that. He only pointed out that they are not just gun grabbing hand guns. Hand guns are usually easier for them to convince voters to support confiscating. They are going after a farmer’s tool, rifles. Lilley was only making sure stupid twits like you didn’t get it wrong
Enema, as usual you are comprehension impaired. Lilley was, again, unwillingly perhaps, making the typical Fudd argument. Read what he says and try to figure out why.
Gun grabbing will have no effect on the Liberal vote.
Liberal Voters do not understand tool use, as parasites have no need to work.
But these “Assault Weapons” the government keeps talking about.
Where can I buy one?
I want one of these magic weapons.
A tool capable of selecting its own target.self loading and unstoppable as it remorselessly slaughters the innocent.
At least that is what I gather,from listening to these illiterate nitwits.
Think how easy the moose hunt would be with one of these wonder guns?
And if it comes with a free Unicorn?
All the better.
Actually I was checking out “Forgotten Weapons” on Youtube, I could settle for a mini gun, electric Gatling.
Funny how the gungrabbers never admit the obvious.
Tools do nothing by themselves.
Why do you think it is so hard to get a Government Employee to move?
“Actually I was checking out “Forgotten Weapons” on Youtube”
Checking out? Are we to understand that you don’t subscribe to Ian’s exquisite work already?????
Just take preemptive action. Buy a crap ton of ammunition. Work out a good and secure hiding place. Report your firearms stolen. Easy peasy, lemon squeezy.
If these guys can’t remove a tent from Wascana Park, why are you gonna let them take your guns?
Kevin on this one your head is up your ass. Those brown shirts won’t touch a small group of Injuns. But they sure will lower the boom on a white man. Equal justice … that’s a laugh.
If you really want Trudeau to go away, stop giving him good advice.
Tell him that confiscating guns will win him more votes. Tell him to legalize abortion into the fifteenth trimester. Tell him that a carbon tax is a sure winner.
Stop trying to lead him into victory.
Don’t just worry about the Libs. I received a mail out from my Conservative rep about targeting gun and gang crime. That’s typical Liberal talking points. We forget at our peril that they are all politicians who think we should be ruled not governed.
ya cant get an fac with a cr record, thats crime #1 whatever it was.
but criminals get guns without the paperwork, that’s crime #2, ferfcuksake, THEY CANT EVEN HOLD ONE IN THEIR HAND.
why do they want a gun?
to commit crimes !!! crime #3 !!!
but wtf does ANY LIEberal ‘gun legislation’ do about it?
nothinnnnnngggg !!!!!!