Into a hundred thousand million pieces: Google Should Be Afraid. Very Afraid.
Make an example of them.
18 Replies to “Break Them Up”
Here’s hoping. In the meantime the DJT administration is burning daylight. The more he does, the more we expect his administration to do.
If you want to make an example, don’t just spin off the Baby Googles to the same people who bankroll Ma Google. Wipe them out.
Nationalize Google, without compensation, and turn its treasure trove of incriminating data on the moral and intellectual superiors of oyrs Google has been covering for to state and local law enforcement. Then release that data publicly for the benefit of a candid world.
Give America’s finest what they need to put traitors, communists and perverts away for good, and give the admirers of China’s basic dictatorship what they think they want. They’re the ones needing an example made of them.
Repeat till Silicon Valley is doing its part to preserve the American people as thoroughly as Startup Nation is doing its own to preserve the Jewish people—and that’s plenty.
New rules. If we don’t have any right not to privacy, neither do they.
Agree with Kate.
“..an investigation will embolden critics of Facebook, Amazon and other tech giants as well…”
Damned straight it will…as it absolutely MUST.
“..over bogus claims that it and some other tech companies unfairly suppress conservative voices online..”
Bogus.?? Typical BULLSHIT Leftist TRIPE from ones Far Left – Communist RAG. Damned straight they Censor Conservatives…!! on a Daily basis. Twatter and Facebook front and centre in that crap. That they need to be broken up is without question with many of its apparatchiks/moderators/owners JAILED.
Run run you Slimy bastards…you will get your comeupance, preferrably sooner than later.
Where oh where is what was once my favourite Web Browser, Netscape Navigator.?
“largely over bogus claims that it and some other tech companies unfairly suppress conservative voices online”
OK … Yahoo “News” … if you want to be BOTH Journalists and opinion writers … then you MUST provide FACTS which support your OPINION that suppression of conservative online voices is a “BOGUS” claim. Whose claim exactly is … “BOGUS”. The most I expect out of such “News” sources is a reference to a Mother Jones or Media Matters article using the term “Bogus”. No, Yahoo … “News” should never legitimately appear in your header.
Having been censored on everything from Breitbart to WAPO I for one understand where it is coming from. Truth is unacceptable to them.
‘… “I don’t think big is necessarily bad, …” Bill Barr, now the U.S. attorney general …’
That’s true, but when big is bad, it’s bad in a big way, and the need to put it right is likewise big.
If you claim to love private property rights in one breath and call for raping a private company you don’t like in the next breath, you may just be an SDAtard.
These tech companies are no longer mere private “property”. They’re close to becoming the equivalent of unaccountable and un-elected global governments unto themselves.
I like how you ignored the -tard slur. Last resort for losers is some desperate ad-hominem attack.
No they’re not. At all. I have never been compelled to pay tax to Google or ever seen a Google-run court. Neither have you. They are private property utterly and completely. If you want perhaps you should create an alternative. Crowd-fund it and all that. If you don’t it’s because it’s really not that important to you.
Neither Standard Oil, or Ma Bell levied taxes, or held Court … yet they violated the Anti-trust Laws. You best study-up on Free Market Capitalism … before Google removes it from your search results … and learn how Monopolies are anathema to Free Markets. In fact, monopolies function identically to Communist State controlled Industries.
Ah! But that is exactly what you want, isn’t it?
ya miss the point unmebot. the situation is *headed in the direction you describe*.
capiche?
You’re the same fool who has no problem with Google helping China be more oppressive.
How long before a politically biased near- monopoly becomes a defacto government body.
Endorse. My God, their censorship of conservatives, their manipulation of search results (“Hillary Clinton’s health”) and their chummy relationship with a hostile, murderous foreign power (the Chicoms) are 3 compelling reasons enough right there.
They’re not ‘chummy’ with China, they’re in a place where they have no choice. Google is not a government they have no army. Oh and that other stuff is just Conservaderp Persecution Complex. Make your own damn company if you hate it so bad.
They have a choice, they can not do business with China. They enable government censorship which is a type of force against its citizens.
Pay attention to what “close to becoming” and “defacto” means.
Aww, come on Kate, Google can’t be that bad.
After all, they made me feel all warm and happy when they lit the Google sign letters up like a birthday cake for me on my birthday a few years ago and wished me a Happy Birthday!
I just typed back “Have a nice day good looking.”
Really, they did.
I have nice friends in very high places. LOL
And yes they need to be broken up, just like Standard Oil was way back when they monopolized the market.
Here’s hoping. In the meantime the DJT administration is burning daylight. The more he does, the more we expect his administration to do.
If you want to make an example, don’t just spin off the Baby Googles to the same people who bankroll Ma Google. Wipe them out.
Nationalize Google, without compensation, and turn its treasure trove of incriminating data on the moral and intellectual superiors of oyrs Google has been covering for to state and local law enforcement. Then release that data publicly for the benefit of a candid world.
Give America’s finest what they need to put traitors, communists and perverts away for good, and give the admirers of China’s basic dictatorship what they think they want. They’re the ones needing an example made of them.
Repeat till Silicon Valley is doing its part to preserve the American people as thoroughly as Startup Nation is doing its own to preserve the Jewish people—and that’s plenty.
New rules. If we don’t have any right not to privacy, neither do they.
Agree with Kate.
“..an investigation will embolden critics of Facebook, Amazon and other tech giants as well…”
Damned straight it will…as it absolutely MUST.
“..over bogus claims that it and some other tech companies unfairly suppress conservative voices online..”
Bogus.?? Typical BULLSHIT Leftist TRIPE from ones Far Left – Communist RAG. Damned straight they Censor Conservatives…!! on a Daily basis. Twatter and Facebook front and centre in that crap. That they need to be broken up is without question with many of its apparatchiks/moderators/owners JAILED.
Run run you Slimy bastards…you will get your comeupance, preferrably sooner than later.
Where oh where is what was once my favourite Web Browser, Netscape Navigator.?
“largely over bogus claims that it and some other tech companies unfairly suppress conservative voices online”
OK … Yahoo “News” … if you want to be BOTH Journalists and opinion writers … then you MUST provide FACTS which support your OPINION that suppression of conservative online voices is a “BOGUS” claim. Whose claim exactly is … “BOGUS”. The most I expect out of such “News” sources is a reference to a Mother Jones or Media Matters article using the term “Bogus”. No, Yahoo … “News” should never legitimately appear in your header.
Having been censored on everything from Breitbart to WAPO I for one understand where it is coming from. Truth is unacceptable to them.
‘… “I don’t think big is necessarily bad, …” Bill Barr, now the U.S. attorney general …’
That’s true, but when big is bad, it’s bad in a big way, and the need to put it right is likewise big.
If you claim to love private property rights in one breath and call for raping a private company you don’t like in the next breath, you may just be an SDAtard.
These tech companies are no longer mere private “property”. They’re close to becoming the equivalent of unaccountable and un-elected global governments unto themselves.
I like how you ignored the -tard slur. Last resort for losers is some desperate ad-hominem attack.
No they’re not. At all. I have never been compelled to pay tax to Google or ever seen a Google-run court. Neither have you. They are private property utterly and completely. If you want perhaps you should create an alternative. Crowd-fund it and all that. If you don’t it’s because it’s really not that important to you.
Neither Standard Oil, or Ma Bell levied taxes, or held Court … yet they violated the Anti-trust Laws. You best study-up on Free Market Capitalism … before Google removes it from your search results … and learn how Monopolies are anathema to Free Markets. In fact, monopolies function identically to Communist State controlled Industries.
Ah! But that is exactly what you want, isn’t it?
ya miss the point unmebot. the situation is *headed in the direction you describe*.
capiche?
You’re the same fool who has no problem with Google helping China be more oppressive.
How long before a politically biased near- monopoly becomes a defacto government body.
Endorse. My God, their censorship of conservatives, their manipulation of search results (“Hillary Clinton’s health”) and their chummy relationship with a hostile, murderous foreign power (the Chicoms) are 3 compelling reasons enough right there.
They’re not ‘chummy’ with China, they’re in a place where they have no choice. Google is not a government they have no army. Oh and that other stuff is just Conservaderp Persecution Complex. Make your own damn company if you hate it so bad.
They have a choice, they can not do business with China. They enable government censorship which is a type of force against its citizens.
Pay attention to what “close to becoming” and “defacto” means.
Aww, come on Kate, Google can’t be that bad.
After all, they made me feel all warm and happy when they lit the Google sign letters up like a birthday cake for me on my birthday a few years ago and wished me a Happy Birthday!
I just typed back “Have a nice day good looking.”
Really, they did.
I have nice friends in very high places. LOL
And yes they need to be broken up, just like Standard Oil was way back when they monopolized the market.