NPC Trigger Warning . . . Men and Women ARE Different!

Baiting The Left 30 Comments

In his latest editorial in the National Post, Jordan Peterson contrasts Scandinavia with Canada. Here’s an excerpt from the latter part:

Given that only 26% of the elected MPs were women, the selection of half the cabinet from this pool means that it is a statistical certainty that the cabinet members chosen were not the most competent available.

It might also be pointed out that such a move is particularly appalling given its source. Let’s assume (which I don’t) that there is patriarchy, and with it, generally undeserved privilege. Let’s even assume (which I don’t) that much of this is accrued unfairly by straight white men, as the identity politics players, such as our Prime Minister, self-righteously and vociferously insist.

Is it truly unreasonable to point out that the absolute poster boy for such privilege is none other than our Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau — a man who dared run for the highest office in the land despite his utter lack of credentials (other than good looks, charm and a certain ability to behave properly in public) merely because his father, Pierre, turned the Trudeau name into the very epitome of status unearned by his sons?

30 Replies to “NPC Trigger Warning . . . Men and Women ARE Different!”

  1. My theory about Justin is that he’s not a feminist but that he hates men. Of course women who voted for Justin also hate men.

    2. ‘Self loathing’ is a strong personality trait of the left … esp. the ‘white’ left. So I have little doubt about your premise that Justin hates men, and does everything possible to deny his own manhood. Next: ‘hate’ of his ‘whitenesss’ will drive him to the tanning salon.

    3. He’s not a feminist because a man cannot be a feminist.

      Any man who claims he is a feminist is a either a fool or a liar or a manipulating schemer.

      Or all three.

    4. “My theory about Justin is that he’s not a feminist …”

      True. He’s just a shallow, arrogant, stupid little tit. And he is where he is because of others who wish they were just like him.

    5. I agree that he is not a feminist, as he could not even define, in his own words, what that means. He is simply a poser, and will adopt whatever stance, talking point, or policy he feels is “trendy”. He will wear Ramadan socks in a Catholic church service, and then go dance in a gay pride parade that afternoon, without any thought as to the incongruity. He will pretend to care about C02 emissions, while jetting around for vacation, and having his lunches driven over from Sussex Drive to P. Hill. He pretends to care about the Metoo movement, but dismisses his own groping, because he remembers it as pleasant. He is Incapable of analysis or self analysis.
      He does not think. He is sold out to whatever “box” the progressives are bleating after at any particular moment.
      All he cares about is the visuals, the aura, the progressive image.
      Cuz that is all he has.

  3. ” and a certain ability to behave properly in public”

    J. Trudeau calling the Right Honorable Peter Kent, Minister of the Environment, a Piece-of-Shit on national television during Question Period belies any ability to behave properly in public. I’m sure others here could go on and on about Zoolander’s lack of proper public acumen and demeanor.
    That said, Zoolander’s constituency generally have the manners of pigs and the IQ of a parsnip so No, everything is just Jake as far as they care about propriety.

    1. But, but, but … isn’t it ‘proper public acting’ for the government elites … to act aloof, effete, and superior in every way? Perhaps THAT is what J.P. meant by ‘behave properly in public’. Behave like a King.

    3. @11:59 Oz
      http://le-peuple.ca/societe/article-3091-1534506460

      Then there’s this, we might recall…

      Name calling Peter Kent, Minister of the Environment in the House of Commons during Q.P. wasn’t enough, the ‘polite’ Prime Minister Justin Trudeau ‘dissed’ a woman in Ste. Jean sur Richelieu last June 23rd. He called her intolerent and a racist for daring to ask a question during his informal speech. Junior tried to drown her out, “Madame, Madame, Madame” ad infinitum. His Majesty’s henchmen manhandled her a little bit on His Royal Highness’s behalf, causing her much distress. Tsk, tsk, tsk!

  4. The question of whether men and women are similar reminds me of a news story I read in the late 1970s.

    A certain American university held a Farrah Fawcett lookalike contest. One young gentlemen entered but couldn’t understand why he was disqualified. He thought he should have been allowed to continue because they both had the same hair style and neither of them knew how to act. (Da-dum tish!)

    Had he waited 40 years, he might have been eligible to compete for Miss Universe….

  5. He claims to be a feminist. It’s his ‘shtick’.
    I think he is more of an ageist, though. Think about the vast difference in ages of his own parents. Secondly, the Cabinet is filled with people about his own age, give or take. The rest of the Libs were expendable. Think about it, Pablo Rodriguez was never in a Cabinet until now. You know the rest.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ageism

    1. Secondly, the Cabinet is filled with people about his own age, give or take. The rest of the Libs were expendable.

      His father at least kept on a number of the “wise old men” from Pearson’s cabinet, such as Mitchell Sharp, Alan MacEachen, and Paul Martin, Sr. They at least had experience in political office.

      Prinz Dummkopf’s cabinet is largely inexperienced and untested. It seems that age was indeed one of the major qualifications for being given a portfolio. If I’m not mistaken, John McCallum might have been the most experienced of the lot and he was quickly ushered out with a cushy diplomatic posting.

      1. You say: “His father at least kept on a number of the ‘wise old men’ from Person’s cabinet…”

        ▪At least Sharp, MacEachen, Paul Martin Sr were able to fend for themselves during Question Period. Pelletier, Marchand and of course the lovely, wise and elegant Jeanne Sauvé and others, too. They were all so searingly sarcastic at times, including Trudeau Sr. OTOH The cabinet under Justin is more rehearsed and don’t seem like they can think on their feet. Trudeau seems to speak for them all. Am I mistaken? I can’t bear to watch the dog and pony show anymore, frankly.

        You say: “Prinz Dummkopf’s cabinet is largely inexperienced…”
        “John McCallum might have been the most experienced of the lot and he was quickly ushered out…”

        ▪Prinz’s ego probably wouldn’t permit anybody trying to boss him around. It had to be otherwise. (Some of the more experienced ‘oldsters’ surprised me. Imagine, Goodale is 69 yrs old, Lawrence MacAulay is 72 yrs old and Carolyn Bennett is 67! As for McCullum, guess the eye-lift job didn’t faze Trudeau enough to keep him around.) Point is, these career politicians are probably voyeuristic and probably part of the ‘choom gang!’ Of course, I could be dead wrong about this. Ha!

        The Prinz would like that though, old hippies who dye their hair and are part of his personal choom BFFs! I know Obama would.

        1. Whether you cared for Trudeau père or not, there is a world of difference between the adult political environment he operated in and the kindergarten playground that Trudeau fils flaps about in.

          1. Agreed. As B A points out @12:30 about the old man surrounding himself with “wise old men”.

            Back in the day, Pierre muttered his own zingers and his words sometimes dripped with sarcasm. However, he once got away with saying “FUDDLE DUDDLE”, but not much else! It was a shocking thing for a Prime Minister to say because everyone knew what it implied. It was alleged he had said the ‘ef ‘ word, but few heard it.

  6. Turdo-the-dumber will have his very own dissonance moment when he realizes he inherited all this white privilege from turdo-the-evil.
    I mean, once they explain it to him for the 14th time and by finally breaking out the big crayons to draw him colorful pictures, and maybe he’ll get it.

  8. Justin Trudeau walks into a Bank to cash a cheque in front of me one day: As he approaches the cashier he says, “Good morning, Ma’am, could you please cash this cheque for me?”

    Cashier: “It would be my pleasure to do that sir. Could you please show me your ID?”

    Trudeau: “Truthfully, I didn’t bring any “ID” with me as I didn’t think there would be any reason, he says, I’m the leader of the Liberal Party, “I am the Prime minister of Canada….

    Cashier: “Yes sir, I know who you are, but with all the regulations and monitoring of the banks today because of all the impostors and forgers and requirements of the CIDC legislation, etc., I must insist on seeing your ID.”

    Trudeau: “Just ask anyone here at the bank who I am and they will tell you. Everybody knows who I am.”

    Cashier: “I am sorry, Mr. Trudeau, but these are the rules and I must follow them.”

    Trudeau: I am urging you, please, cash this cheque.”

    Cashier: “Look Mr. Trudeau , here is an example of what we can do. One day, Mike Weir came into the bank without ID. To prove he was Mike Weir he pulled out his putter and made a beautiful shot across the bank into a cup. With that shot we knew him to be Mike weir and cashed his cheque for him.

    Another time, Wayne Gretzky came in without ID. He pulled out his hockey stick and made a fabulous shot with a hockey puck it landed in an over turned trash can at the other end of the bank. With that shot we cashed his cheque.

    So, Mr. Trudeau, what can you do to prove that it is really you, and only you?”

    Trudeau stands there thinking, and thinking, and finally says, ummmm “Honestly, my mind is totally blank, I have absolutely no idea what to do, I don’t have a clue.” I really don’t have a clue.

    Cashier: Says, Ok thanks Will that be large or small bills, Mr Trudeau?”

  10. “Given that only 26% of the elected MPs were women, the selection of half the cabinet from this pool means that it is a statistical certainty that the cabinet members chosen were not the most competent available.”

    Add another qualifier to that: as 100 percent of all MPs owe their positions to winning an election, there is a statistical certainty that the MPs elected are not the most competent available.

  11. Bongo’s ‘intelligence’ lies in his ability to regurgitate talking points on all issues that are popular. Climate change, feminism, Trump and so on. He has never had a thought of his own. When challenged on the talking point topics he is incapable of defending his ideas and resorts to ad hominem attack.

    The world is full of his types. Calgary radio has a pair doing the morning show. Vomiting out pop culture ad nauseam but unable to present a cogent argument in any serious discussion.

    Peterson is right in that he’s done nothing accomplished nothing and is undeserving/unqualified for the job he finds himself in.

    The pressures of the task are starting to show. His rock star persona is wearing thin. The polls are slipping. The proles are calling him names.

    He ain’t the old man who just up and told everyone to FO. Bongo wants to be loved.

  12. Another astute piece by Peterson
    An aside….if you can stomach it, check out the CBC’s list of best Canadian books for 2018. Despite the fact that Jordan P has sold millions of books this year, he is nowhere to be seen on this cbc list or any lists put out by those elite twits.
    It reminds me of another favourite Canadian writer….Jack Whyte, who has sold millions of his excellent historical fiction books, but who is shunned by the Canadian literati. So, between Whyte and Peterson, they have likely sold more popular and engaging books than the full stable of Canada council funded writers (scribblers), even if you include Atwood.
    Excuse the digression. This is the kind of shite that pisses me off. We should be celebrating the success of our best. People all over the world love Peterson and Whyte’s books, which are translated into many languages. Will that be the case for the crap on the cbc list?

    1. You might also note the absence of a book by a certain Stephen Harper. I’ve decided to read only Canadian books NOT on any CBC list.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation