19 Replies to “When The FBI Does It: Jordan Vs Strzok”

  1. I managed to endure the entirety of the Senate sometimes circus atmosphere proceedings.

    Peter Strzok managed to trot out the assertion that, throughout his manifold texts/tweets, he never allowed political bias into any of his investigatory decision making vis a vis Hillary Clinton & Donald Trump respectively. This is a hilarious textbook attempt at ‘self deception’. The general opinion on the live chat, during his testimony, via youtube was one of disbelief, followed by outright contempt.

    Credibility veracity: “100 MILLION TO ZERO”

    Cheers
    Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group ‘True North’

    1. So, it turns out that even though you despise someone, share your political animus against that person repeatedly to a colleague (and side chick), do this during working hours using employer provided devices, advocate taking immediate action against that hated person BECAUSE a partisan who shares your political beliefs is temporarily in power….. you can still be fair and balanced. He’s a saint I tells ya.

      Yeah, Ratcliffe nailed it….. right to the heart of the matter.

      Too bad others weren’t as effective.

  3. Are there a lack of yard-arms in Washington DC?
    What a weasel!

    “Understand the position I am in. I will not be the fall-guy”

  5. My first thought was why hasn’t someone removed that smirk with a baseball bat . Actually I believe they are guilty of conspiracy to overthrow the election of the President – jail be dammed – hang them for treason .

    1. Yep, nothing a 2×4 to the side of the head wouldn’t solve. Although this creep looks like he would need a stake through the heart. The FBI is rancid.

  6. For a second I must depart from saying anything particularly insightful. Here it is: Why shouldn’t someone just punch that disgraceful little sh!t in his sh!tty little teeth, breaking them all and save us all from with his pathetic self-righteous sociopathic blather.

    1. I have a better idea. Waterboard the bastard. When the nation’s survival is at stake, you do what you have to do to make its enemies talk.

  7. Well, Mr. Strzok really ought to have invoked his fifth amendment right against self-incrimination.

    Even Mark Furhman was smart enough to do that, after all was lost: I well remember Scott Turow writing a column, which appeared in the Globe and Mail in the midst of the OJ Trial, wherein Mr. Turow asserted that Mr. Fuhrman had infringed Mr. Simpson’s fourth amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure by going over the wall, without a search warrant. Something about a bloody glove found near the back door of Mr. Simpson’s home (I happen to believe that it was planted, and, to this day, that belief effects my understanding of that particular case).

    Mr. Strzok has no real cause to “take one for the team” — he’s guilty, on irrefutable evidence, and everybody knows it: even the idiot Democrats on the Committee get that much. Appealing to the “layers of authority” he had to go through — assistant director (basically fired) and director (fired) was utterly embarrassing, and argues for, actually, “TEAR IT ALL DOWN.”

  8. Why would any of these scumbags be anything but smug? I mean Hillary walked easily. They really believe they gave trump on the ropes here. The blue wave and impeachment is still their fantasy. The election night riots will be epic. They’ll only be eclipsed by the Mueller firing riots after trump wins his second term.

  9. The guy who changed the Clinton investigation into the Clinton “matter”.

    Start there would be my tact.

  10. And all the Dem Reps,”3000 children!”
    Funny when the number was just as high (pun intended) for Obama, they didn’t give a rat’s ass.

  11. So the FBI believes it is above the Congress and the Senate, and is not answerable to either….
    Sounds like Hillary.

  12. God bless Trey Gowdy

    That guy knows how to get under the skin of a witness and catch them in their lie.
    The minute he got Stzrok cornered the democrat members started their talkover
    If this goes the way I think it will there are a lot of folks at the FBI and ranking democrats members that at the very least wil be unemployed.

  13. The Piss-ants of John Brennan>>> Stzrok spouts the Hillary Talking Points without the intelligence to spot the obvious.. He was incompetent as an Agent.
    He was outraged by the GOLDSTAR family…But where were the 1000’s of other Gold Star families who chose not to be a political Prop.

    He was engaged in adultery, but was a special virtuous child blessed by the POPE…Not sure what he would not do if Brennan asked…

    The hearing will slowly get to Page->-Sally Yates.>—Susan Rice and Obama..

    JMHO

    His vertios

  14. The video is just as interesting if you don’t look at Stzrok,,,but look at the faces and body language of his staff around him while just listening to the audio. At points in the testimony, they are on eggshells with his answers, and relief when he gains control and get back on track. They know where the bombs are buried as much as Stzrok.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation