Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
And to think I feel guilty about putting my motorcycle helmet on it – even with a few bugs it was cleaner than that.
Couldn’t see that one coming. /sarc
Hunter Thompson once said about America (incorrectly, IMO)
“…you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high water mark — that place where the wave finally broke, and rolled back.”
I think that we may be at that moment in this leftwing virtue-signalling. At some point Starbucks is going to have to return to kicking non-paying occupants of their shops out. Or they will go out of business.
This is what happens when you give in to the whiner class.
I have never patronized Starbucks, I make my own coffee and when I’m away from home and really need a coffee there’s cheap good enough coffee readily available. I even drink instant coffee sometimes, there’s some delicious instant options – espresso or flavoured. Any competent adult who makes any effort to budget their spending should avoid overpaying for basic daily coffee requirements…
Having said all that, the point of my post… I believe Tim Horton’s in Canada has always had a policy of allowing the general public to have access to their washrooms and, over the years, I’ve only seen and heard of problems in the Toronto and Calgary inner cities/urban cores with homeless and addicts trashing the cans. I wonder about any downtown Vancouver Timmy’s horror shows. Any knowledgeable Tim Horton’s insiders or regulars reading this who can comment?
I suspect that you are right and that in certain urban environments the problem would be intolerable while most locations would be fine. Big box stores have washrooms available to all and have few problems but they aren’t located in inner cities. I still don’t patronize Starbucks as I don’t like their overpriced coffee and pastries let alone their progressive corporate culture.
With a great deal of sanity, most places let the local operator decide if “bathroom controls” are needed or not. Starbucks, near me, had some of each. Open to all in the nice places, with locks at the one near the abandoned Rail Road Tracks with people camping there for miles… It ought to return to that local control policy. Only the guy running the shop knows if he has an issue to deal with or not.
LOTS of places have open bathrooms. One option is the way Walmart does it (though they are big enough and a Starbucks shop isn’t). The bathroom has no door, just a open hallway / baffles. Like in most airports. Enough traffic and visibility to prevent clandestine activities, not enough to violate privacy on the “can”.
Starbucks Central Planning Committee made the wrong choice, as most Central Authorities do. They need to return to devolved authority.
I don’t know how they do it, but it seems to me that Tim’s washrooms are built from new to look like IV user shooting galleries. Brand new store opened where I used to live north of Toronto and the bathrooms were disgusting after the first week. Now, this was in Keswick, so that may be your problem right there.
Was in Cambridge recently and the Tim’s I stopped in had a sign on the door saying that the cans were locked after 7:00 pm “for your safety”. The tap in the sink dispensed only a pathetic dribble of cold water, probably to discourage the locals from bathing in the sink. Which was unfortunate, as I had to bathe in the sink after accidentally stepping in the Grand River.
This won’t last long. Expect the policy to quietly disappear. Libs love the poor and huddled masses…just not anywhere they can see them.