10 Replies to “Deep Impact”

  2. “Imagine Chicago without the Sun-Times.”

    Well, there’s something to look forward to. Thanks for that hopeful thought, Chicago Sun-Times.

    1. Ah, but if the paper goes belly up, what’ll people use for lining bird cages?

  3. Oh wait, you want me to donate money to you so you can carry on defaming my race, creed and gender, and practically begging for genocide against my historical people…?

    Not to mention the gun-slinging gansterism you Dem-lickers enabled, the catastrophic destruction of the Black family over which you continue to hold sway… Good riddance. Don’t let the door hit you in the *** on the way out, f****rs…

  4. “Imagine #Chicago without the Sun-Times. Today’s front page is a reminder that without your support we won’t survive.”

    Well, today’s front page contains about the same amount of legitimate news as the rest of the rag.

  5. If they hired journalists instead “journalists” that could work.
    It is not good for city to lose a newspaper. The trouble is of course that they must of necessity bring news, hence newspapers.
    If they insist on changing the world in their own image they lose, every time.

    Yesterday, there was a link on Drudge how Trump is good for media, that NYT gained a lot because of Trump.

    Could be a wishful thinking, there steaming piles of it around.

  6. § 8-4-025
    … Where the person being solicited receives an item or service of little or no monetary value in exchange for a donation, under circumstances where a reasonable person would understand that the transaction is in substance a donation.

    Yep, apparently it’s legal; the Chicago Sun that is…

    1. I guess they’ll need to become subway buskers in order to keep the lights on, eh?

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation