Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
So, the paper of record and all the rest are staffed directly out of the Kremlin. Tell me other shocking stuff I don’t already know.
It’s had the nickname “Pravda on the Potomac” for many years.
Because “True-Dope-ians” all agree the China’s basic dictatorship is a superior form of government; and entrenching corruption is ‘good for business’!
The overall democide for the Peoples Republic of China (1928-1987) was 76,702,000 people killed; and now WaPo thinks that dictatorship and it’s return is a great thing. Symbolically WaPo’s moniker is Democracy Dies in Darkness; especially when you are cheer-leading it’s demise!
Prosit!
Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group ‘True North’
For there to have been democide in China there would have to be “demos” to “cide”, and than has never been the case. Not that I think it’s a good thing that happened, but this is the way China has always been and it’s not likely changing any time soon.
Not following you… democide just refers to the mass murder of any group of people by their government. This has clearly occurred in China – probably the worst case of democide in history.
***The Washington Post***
Communism Thrives in Darkness.
“Trump joked about the term-limits move, saying Xi is now “president for life. President for life. No, he’s great. And, look, he was able to do that. I think it’s great.”
“Maybe we’ll have to give that a shot someday,” Trump went on.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/03/04/in-a-jokey-speech-trump-praised-chinas-xi-for-ditching-term-limits-saying-maybe-well-give-that-a-shot-some-day/?utm_term=.101536fa27af
Don’t take what Trump says literally.
Take his actions seriously. But you knew that didn’t you?
Having the biggest country on Earth under another dictatorship is never going to be good.
China’s recent openness has been all about the fact that the Premier/President could only hold office for 10 years and then the next most competent person took over. The term limits keep the leader acting in the best interest of the people since there is a legacy and future reprisals to keep in mind.
Now Xi will be looking to crack down whenever a threat to his power appears (think any kind of action there is, as in what do dictators normally do when they are asserting their authority, as in secret jails and torture etc.) and pretty soon, Xi’s son is going to be the “Prince-in-waiting” and then it goes even further downhill from there.
Short of democracy, the next best option is term limits for the leaders.
Even with democracy, term limits are a good option for all positions.
China has never been anything other than a communist dictatorship. That they change the guy at the top in no way changes the communist control.
Short but good analysis.
What Xi Jinping’s power grab means for Canada
Beneath all the win-win rhetoric, and sops to Canadian greed, the real goal is buttressing the rise to power of a new global order, where liberal democratic principles are eclipsed by Xi Jinping’s determined, authoritarian passion to restore China’s lost greatness.
According to diplomatic lists maintained by Global Affairs Canada, the United States has 138 accredited foreign representatives at its embassy and consulates in Canada.
But China has 169.
There was actually a time when Dictator was not considered a bad thing to be called. Even a car – a Studebaker model was called a Dictator.
But that was 1937 – 80 years and over a hundred million murders ago…
That motto;”Democracy dies in darkness” seems more like the intent at The Washington Post.
Keep ’em in the dark and feed ’em bullshit.
Or what was that Podesta gem?
An ignorant and compliant electorate, great plan,working well wrt the ignorance, compliance not working so well.
The wanna bees are small nasty people, who always believe their tiny world view is best for all and the world would be perfect if only they were in command.
Time we rewarded our leaders, based on results.
For those who have enslaved us with generational debt, a gory public excution would be a fine start.
Public servants who have built public debt,welfare and dependency as their “service to us” should also be paid accordingly.As in made to pay us.
Maybe one of them could cut my grass.
There was a time in classical Greece where, when the politicians that could be compared to todays, were so corrupt and dictatorial, the citizens of a city state would vote in a tyrant.
As the word implies, they were precisely that. The tyrant would put things in order by brute force. The interesting thing is that the tyrant could and would be voted out of office by the citizens.
That is not to say a tyrant would not want to be your basic Xi.
They normally would kill the sonofabitch.
Don’t mean to dump on his mother.
Figure of speech.
Xi is 65. How long will he last anyway? 10 years?
And what’s so good about democracy anyway? Look at Canada.
Jeff, when the people are stupid and the people they vote for are even more stupid, Canada is what you get.
WAPO, all the BS they see fit to print. They are worse than the Red Star.