Here’s your personal liberty and choice.
Gatineau police say the level of violence escalated once the man discovered the girl was removing her hijab when she was away from the family home
Here’s your personal liberty and choice.
Gatineau police say the level of violence escalated once the man discovered the girl was removing her hijab when she was away from the family home
What’s a “bag libertarian”?
It means someone who actually consistently respects individual rights and doesn’t arbitrarily toss them aside when someone wears something Kate doesn’t like.
Ooh I can play this idiotic game too. Someone did something bad with guns, therefore we get to ban guns right?
What in the world does “For all the bag libertarians out there” mean? It appears to me to be some sort of cheap shot against libertarians. I would suggest Lance try to put something together that actually ties into libertarian thought and positions on issues . . . something more than guilt by spurious headline-association.
“something more than guilt by spurious headline-association. ”
But that’s all he and his fellow petty authoritarians have.
ewe mean LIBERALtarians, don’t cha
I find liberaltarians have a problem with context, were individual rights are concerned. You can not partake of societies benefits but pretend to be absolutely disconnected form it.
I know nothing about libertarians, bagged or otherwise, but I think that all of the people who are protesting Quebec’s proposed ban on face coverings should be interested in the linked news article if they think wearing a burka is “freedom of expression”.
I have heard that face coverings arebanned in some Ay-rab countries, including Saudi Arabia the where they follow a very strict interpretation of sharia law.
“You can not partake of societies benefits but pretend to be absolutely disconnected form it. ”
You’ve really tackled that strawman right there.
To anyone who would accuse me of not knowing the difference between a hijab and a burka, I will proudly say “You’re right!!”
This comment more or less perfectly encapsulates the ‘stupid and proud’ zeitgeist that has seized the modern right, and will be its downfall.
It is always entertaining to watch libtards and mooselimbs pretending to be outraged libertarians.
Most people who style themselves “libertarians” are really just libertines.
OMG, I love the phrase “bag libertarian” and I’m a libertarian! Too funny.
It depends who the Quebec man is.
It depends who the Portuguese man is.
No?
Sooooo … I guess dropping her panties is completely out of the question? Or is it just really all about the “symbolism” of the face wrap ?
Nothing remotely amusing about this story if you live near Kingston Mills and remember the Shafia daughters and first Shafia wife. That started with the father being upset about the way his daughters dressed.
Thank you for the sole intelligent comment on this topic.
Look at this point you’re a racist for being born white so embrace it. I don’t want sand people here unless they leave they accept our values. That’s racist or something because I’m white or whatever but racism means nothing anymore. I’m proud to be white and I wasn’t before. Good job sjw.
I must agree with the lefties here, the daughter was clearly asking for it and just because she was in canada does not mean that her culture must be abandoned. She knew what the real law was and chose to ignore it thinking that some femininely enhanced males in the west would support her. How stupid, how provocative, how misogynistic of her to think like that.
The west is full of pussies, islam has the real men, the true and valuable culture, and the right to take it with them wherever they go. So just listen to what they say, accept the beatings with gladness, and pray for an early death – cause that is all you will get.
That is the lefty view after all.
I don’t want them here. I have no say in the fact that they are. If they want to behave like animals to each other when they get here is no concern of mine. I have no more interest in what they do to each other here than what they do to each other in Yemen. I am not going to “white knight” for their women. Their women are part of their culture and they can deal with it. If they want to change their culture it’s up to them. If they try to foist it on me, it will be different.
they are foisting it on you. your level of awareness is not as high as it should be.
Glad to see you’re duly upset by domestic violence in Canada. If only you paid as much attention, and directed as much outrage, on all the other kinds of domestic abuse and not just the ones involving Muslims.
Glad to see you’re duly upset by SDA’s coverage of this assault. If only you paid as much attention, and directed your outrage, to all the other outrages perpetrated by violent muzzie-wugs.
So maybe then we should concentrate on fixing our OWN problems, domestic violence and otherwise, BEFORE importing more of the same from other 3rd World hellholes, hmmmm?
Nah, just as some of us can walk and chew gum at the same time, I think Canada can both prosecute perpetrators of domestic abuse and continue its tradition as a country welcoming of immigrants.
Oh, I am aware, and duly outraged. The difference is, some of us are outraged whenever any person abuses a family member, while some of us first need to know that person’s religion before deciding if they really care.
Which kind of person are you?
*
“unme squeals… Ooh I can play this idiotic game too.”
unme, sweetie… i thought you be embarrassed to show your face
after mounting a defense of canada’s biggest opiod dealer ever…
who, surprise, surprise… was also muslim…
“The only outrage here is the continued persecution of people for
committing non-crime such as drug dealing and owning guns.”
*
Weekend pass from the loony bin?
*
“gellen says… That started with the father being upset about the
way his daughters dressed. “
and ended with the serial slaughter of his three teenage
daughters and the spare wife he snuck into canada.
c’mon unme… let’s hear you defend mo shafia.
*
She filed a police complaint, she was removed to safety, the father is facing charges. The system worked exactly the way it’s supposed to.
Restrict immigration from third-world sh!tholes, arrest and deport when they commit (real) crimes here, and we don’t need to pass stupid laws.
“Oh, I am aware, and duly outraged…Which kind of person are you?”
The kind who is really good at detecting contrived outrage.
I don’t know what a bag libertarian is but I do know what an automatonic one is. Open borders is part of a libertarian big picture which includes a virtual or near stateless society complete with absolute free speech with necessarily private discrimination in the exercise of property rights. A libertarian society absolutely could not exist within the type of theocracy inherent in Shariah. Shariah-based enclaves (and or socialist co ops) could however exist within a libertarian society essentially as ghettos or today’s no-go zones only to the extent that what level if any, of limited government was mandated to protect Muslims from their own theocratic versions of fascism.
An automatonic libertarian advocates for open borders for all, ignoring the reality of the status quo of socialist / fascist states and their accommodation of Islam wherever they migrate. Segregated swimming pool times, halal, limits on free speech, and prayer space in public facilities are the just first steps on the road to Shariah. An automatonic libertarian loves to put down conservatives for their willingness to adopt a form of (arguably incremental?) fascism to possibly stave off the ultimate fascism promised by Shariah from mass Muslim immigration but can offer no comment other than denial of the fundamental link between Islam and Shariah or a flawed moral equivalence between Muslims and historically non-Muslim immigrants.
Except the system doesn’t work as our courts have started to accept ignorance of the law as a defence. So it is still our fault because we failed to educate the father.
It didn’t work in that case. It worked in this one. The perfect is the enemy of the good. As I said, the solution is to properly execute the system we do have, which criminalizes trespass against person and property, and to be selective about who we allow to become part of our society.
Sartorial laws are really, really stupid, and the start of a nasty slippery slope. Frankly, in a country where a man was sent to jail for selling barley to someone who wanted to buy it I would think we’d be a bit more skeptical of using the power of the government to make other people do what we want. But then, not even SDA is immune to Heinlein’s Truism.
Yes, and if Shafia is still leading prayer meetings in prison, I’d like an answer to that one. He was in 2015 and being arrogant and obnnoxious about it. Anyone reading this article would want to get their hands on papa Shafia personally. I know I would.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/mohammad-shafia-intimidated-prisoners-into-attending-prayers-1.3061580
“Nah, just as some of us can walk and chew gum at the same time”
NO, you can’t. Really, you can’t. STOP pretending that you can, your presumption is harmful.
UnMe/ Eli want freedom for Neo Nazi milling around Canadian public places in SS uniforms or K.K.K hoods while simultaneously broadcasting Mein Kamph from loudspeakers mounted atop of tall buildings.
They want your kids taking forced diversity and tolerance training towards Nazi and K.K.K ideologies in school.
There’s no evidence of Sharia in western society. None. The no go zones are also a myth. Good to see you’ve outed yourself as a fascist though. That’s honesty.
except of course, the violence, the burkha, the police reports, and the bodies.
But, this really doesn’t count for evidence as none of it can be found up your @@@ where your head lives.
*
“unme screams… There’s no evidence
of Sharia in western society.”
let’s ask the three shafia girls… oh wait…
they’re all dead.
you, sir… are an imbecile.
*