
“In one corner you have the unstoppable force of leftist politics. 31 flavors of gender. Gender and race are social constructs. You don’t need fathers. Womendon’tneednomanfishbicycle ™. Follow your heart and the money will follow. In short the entirety of the past 50 years of leftist politics.
In the other corner you have the immovable object of a mere 2 million years of human evolution.
And, as is always the case when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object, the laws of physics dictates an explosion…or as Sammy David dictates “something’s gotta give.”

Not sure why you would put a picture of grant – a great actor but a lefty nonetheless.
http://www.liquisearch.com/cary_grant/politics
Over at PowerLine John Hinderaker has proposed a simple question to be asked of any political candidate: How many genders are there?
Then stand back and watch while the progressive candidates twist themselves in knots trying to give a non-scientific answer to a scientific question.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/10/a-freeport-question-for-our-time.php
there is no thing as an immovable object. there is no such thing as an unbreakable object. nuclear fusion will consume the object with its own mass.
nothing is unbreakable, just put 2 of them on a collision course at the near speed of light and see what happens.
but, leftists always ‘win’ because *they* will change the rules in a nanosecond and cry unfair if the referee calls foul. and march to protest, and plant bombs etc etc.
Grant is a solid choice for a masculine icon. Personally, I was not aware of his politics which are not relevant in this context.
Politics are always relevant in this conversation- masculine appearance does not denote political leanings or attitude
“masculine appearance does not denote political leanings or attitude” — I say Grant is a good masculine icon — regardless of his politics (whatever they are.)
good lord, are you that thick, one’s voting record is not indicative of one’s political or social leanings. I’v witnessed quite few Con voters who were/are actually liberals, and vice versa. Fact theRE was an well written article on this very topic a few years ago. And as I’v said before,butt will do so again, most religious people are lefties or apolitical, regardless of how they vote. Best up yer meds McBulk
Captain! A very nice read, and all completely TRUE. You are correct, the immovable object is … as it always is (in modern society) … Economics. For all the Bernie Sanders-styled protestations … Economics … REAL Free Market Economics are the immovable object. Why Economics? Because I have become convinced that Economics is the modern equivalent to human survival. The struggle to feed and clothe ones self on the African veldt hasn’t, and never will, change throughout human history. Economics is the ONE constant in our fungible, pliable, society. Because it IS existential survival. Humans will ALWAYS do what is necessary to SURVIVE. And the cacophony of the nonsensical leftist ideology will never alter the basic DRIVE for human SURVIVAL. In the jungle of Economics … it is survival of the fittest. You want to indenture yourself to a lifetime paying for bloated professorial pensions? Go for it … the unpaid remainder of your debt will be discharged at the moment of your untimely death. As you have said before, you cannot be economically STUPID and survive. Not all the leftists are IDIOTS … just the really noisy ones. There are plenty of leftists who will eventually vote for tax relief … or will flee France like Gérard Depardieu. Because the drive to survive cannot be altered by anything … or the Darwin principle kicks in.
By the way … there IS a similar college degree to a “Masters in Puppetry” which is (evidently) a viable degree … a “Masters in Puppetry of the Penis”. Why, such a degree can get you onto the cover and centerfold of a famous magazine. Just stretch, tuck, and pull that flaccid member up your own anus … and voila! You are a pantransomething SUPERSTAR !
So you show us two pictures of Homosexuals? LOL!
The guy supported the furthest left option in ‘68 – rfk. That’s more than just voting Dem.
I think you are mixing up Cary Grant and Rock Hudson. Hudson was the homosexual.
You’re probably right. However if you were to Google “Cary Grant gay”, I think you’ll find the jury is still out on that.
I think we’re missing something here.
It is not about one’s shortcomings in life but about presentation.
How we as individuals act honourably upon these short comings.
You mean when it’s so small, you don’t NEED a tuck-under ?
Cary Grant – Howard Roark in The Fountainhead
If you’re thinking of the movie with Patricia Neal, then it would have been Gary Cooper.
Maybe Grant was in a different adaptation, maybe stage or TV.
… and didn’t Cary Grant look so MANLY … with his shirt off … working in the stone quarry? That has got to give stiffies to ALL the Hollywoodies
Well said Captain. This thread is seriously related to the “The Children Are Our Future” thread above.
The barbarians within the gates may skew the collision of the “unstoppable force” and the “immovable object”.