The Party of ‘No’

11 Replies to “The Party of ‘No’”

1. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/uk-canadian-womens-march-protesters-denied-entry-us-montreal-border-agents-a7539341.html
   Good. Stupid people interfering and going to a riot in a foreign country. What did they expect? Imagine the outrage if a busload of anti-Trudeau rioters were stopped entering Canada. Oh, wait, the democrats sent a team up here to help him.

2. Typical Trump arrogance to think he should be able to appoint the leader of this illustrious Democrat institution.

3. No matter who trump appoints to head the CIA, he will be nowhere near as partisan as Obama’s CIA director. That was a disgraceful show.

4. It’s hard to believe there are so many people living in a democracy who accept the results of an election when their party loses. Never in memory have we seen such sore losers, they need to hang their heads in shame, failing that they need to educate themselves, take a look at some dictatorships around the world and places like Saudia Arabia and Iran where women are treated like chattels and worse.

5. At this rate they might need to open up a brand new “Snowflake Slammer” to hold them all:
   http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2017/01/21/many-inauguration-day-protesters-will-face-felony-rioting-charges-prosecutors-say/
   I guess they always were destined to be cared for by the state.

6. Soros won’t pay for that kind of protest….

7. Democrats are DESPERATE to hang onto their partisan plants throughout our government agencies. The swamp WILL be drained … a small delay won’t matter

8. (meant to add this)
   http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-22/ex-wsj-reporter-finds-soros-has-ties-more-50-partners-women%E2%80%99s-march-washington

9. Now who are the deplorables?

10. Robert:
    I was astonished to read of about 10 bus loads of women from Canada traveling to Washington to agitate against their democratically elected President. I am surprised that all weren’t turned back at the border, that would have been a reasonable action.
    The lunacy and sheer hypocrisy of these people knows no bounds.
    Many of the same people would have voted for a Liberal, fanatical zealot in Ont, determined to drive the province into ruin. And federally they would have voted for a part-time high school teacher. They see nothing amiss with these choices, yet a foreign leader they don’t like, drives them into frenzy. The greatest effect on one’s well being or comfort comes from locally elected leaders; they are the ones setting tax rates, laws, regulations and so on. A foreign leader can affect one only indirectly, other than waging war, and no one seriously suggests President Trump is thinking of invading. Canada has no grounds to criticize and protest the legitimate election choices of our neighbour; to do so demonstrates a startling degree of boorishness and insensitivity.Americans deserve better than self righteous hectoring from Canadians.

11. Nice one, WalterF.