The New York Times edited out all mentions of a statement made by secretary of state John Kerry that condemned Palestinian leaders for calling for “days of rage” against Israel and called the synagogue attack “an act of pure terror and senseless brutality and murder.”
An analysis of the New York Times in the Times of Israel shows that parts of this statement that initially appeared in stories regarding the terrorist attack were scrubbed from the stories before the paper went to print.
The NY Times has a psychologically deficient need to pretend that the rest of the world doesn’t get their news elsewhere.
On another note the terrorist sympathizer Obola would not even mention terrorism and even went as far as apologizing to Palestinians for loosing too many of their poor young people.
Transparency! At least the pOTUS method of transparency probably as learned from the “Old Grey Lady”. Wait for it; “She’ll be returning in 2016.
could some one please tell me what demographic the owners of the NYT belong to????
left wing Jooish outfit censoring a leftwing Joo, it doesn’t get any funnier then that. Kinda like Hitler, with a Jooish heritage and a socialist, killing of fellow Joos and the lefty supporting demographics, as gays Joos, and us gypsys generally tend to be:-))
It’s very easy to explain the NYT editors couldn’t believe that any one connected to the WH would be critcizing Muslims and taking the side of Isreal so they just temporarily pulled the story until they could check their facts. (And if you believe that you also believe in AGW)
I think the Sulzbergers should look into their hearts and then look into their editorial staff.
Oh the NY Times bias? It’s a wonder they’re even reporting the story in the first place. Palestinians can only be perpetual victims.
http://www.thelasttradition.com/
NME666
What is it that drives you to puff yourself up and start shouting about “Jews/Joos/Jooish etc” when there was no discussion of ethnicity or similar subject. This thread is all about the pathetic mainstream media and the censoring of the equally pathetic Secretary Kerry. However by now we realize almost any subject triggers anti-Jewish sentiments from you. Give it a rest.
And or Christians. He has a real hate on for both.
It’s probably a sign that John Kerry is showing a few signs of intelligence, as in the Pravda account of his chat with Foreign Minister Lavrov:
http://english.pravda.ru/news/world/19-11-2014/129076-kerry_lavrov_obama-0/#.VHE95UtbxuY
(Quite different from Hillary Clinton’s nonsensical ideas about diplomacy.)
Therefore Kerry must be discredited and disposed of.
I would guess that any statement Kerry gives to the press would have to be authorized by his master. One phone call from Obama and the NY Times would be tripping all over itself to please his lordship. Obama hates Israel but tries to restrain himself because there’s too many Jewish votes at stake in NY to let his true feelings show. Kerry’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer and probably forgot that all he’s allowed to speak about is the biggest threat to the planet, climate change. That little slip up just annoyed his Muslim master.