Ever since the story about the horrific and widespread sex abuse in Rotherham broke, pundits have scrambled for an explanation as to how crimes on that scale could continue unchecked for so long. Yesterday the NYT released a story on Rotherham that at least reached for an explanation. But though the NYT notes both the ethnicity of the abusers and British officials’ “fear of being accused of racism,” as Dawn Eden points out on the Get Religion site, the article conspicuously fails to mention religion.
the peaceful followers of islam would not do something so vile.S/
They called out the perverts that had infiltrated the Catholic church and that’s church inappropriate response to them and lo and behold, things got cleaned up.
Nothing will ever change with Islam because no one is able to criticize it. Sadly, they are most likely going to annihilate themselves as they argue over whose nephew was a prophet and who wasn’t.
This was allowed to happen because Labourites and their ilk despise the British working classes. The girls from this class would, therefore, be considered scrubbers and slags, deserving of their fate.
Could it be………Satan?!