The Sound Of Settled Science

11 Replies to “The Sound Of Settled Science”

1. Any self-respecting scientist who made the predictions above should resign or publicly refute the theory of CAGW premised on increasing C02. That they will not do so is testament to the allure of rent seeking in the largest money game since the military industrial complex. Being aligned with the eco-fascists effectively seeking world governance is a bonus.

2. Hey, not everyone uses that irritating twitter crap. Please post real links to the data.

3. Hey, I agree with north of 60

4. Hey, Google is your friend… http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/

5. not good enough… links to the actual article referenced are preferred

6. Scroll down Goddard’s blog page and try not to be so effing demanding and lazy…OK..?..

7. with north of 90 being stooped and lazy is a feature, not a bug:-))))
   and thanx for the link, I won’t tell U that I always wait for other posters to point the way:-))))

8. if you want to play personal insults go stand in front of a mirror where it might do some good

9. It is unfortunate that nothing falsifies the CAGW hypothesis. I’m sure, even by random chance, there must be some prediction or projection that came true but I can’t think of anything at the moment. Now that the IPCC is lowering its sensitivity estimates to better fit observations (and skeptics) you’d think the catastrophics would give it a rest. Lay low until natural variation begins to work in their favour.

10. Would be nice if the global warming alarmists kept their data……and didn’t “adjust” it time and again.
    North of 60 isn’t entertaining, informed or terribly bright.

11. Since I don’t do anything but enjoy the fruits of Kate’s labours here, it would never cross my mind to demand anything.
    I guess manners aren’t needed North of the 60th parallel.