Pity it doesn’t really recognize that rule of law and property rights doesn’t apply to firearms owners in Canada.
Of course it should read “don’t apply”…pity there’s no edit capability here.
Excellent guide to work on the CPC platform for 2015. We might also consider trying to improve trade, military, and cultural cooperation with Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, and the UK.
5 of the top six are current or former British commonwealth countries
That’s the 10% property rights thier still working on.
If this survey was about SS Hail Redfraud from Alberta, of course corruption and property rights would be out the window.
Obviously.
But Neil Young hates Harper.
So Canada is currently wicked.
Sorry.
When you stop and consider that over 50% of Canadian voters actually think health care is free, that jobs can be created if the government just hired more people, and, windmills and solar panels dont need wind or the sun to produce electricity its amazing Mr Harper has lasted as long as he has and has done as much as he has.
Poke fun at Neil Young all you want, but, he pretty much represents over 50% of Canadians, and, that should scare us all.
PETITION TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS
IN PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED
We, the undersigned citizens of Canada draw the attention of the House to the following: THAT : as individual Citizens of Canada WE do NOT enjoy the protection of “PROPERTY RIGHTS” within the Constitution of Canada ! hence, THE LAW of Canada!
THEREFORE: Your petitioners call upon Parliament to forthwith, incorporate and entrench FOREVER , individual “PROPERTY RIGHTS” INTO THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA.
Make no mistake about this….
Should the New Democratic Party gain elctoral power in Canada under the leadership of Thomas Mulcair, Canada will be a ….. defacto….. COMMUNIST state and ALL “PROPERTY RIGHTS” will belong to the communist state!!
Individual PROPERTY RIGHTS will be a pipe dream, and never again ….. REALITY!
There’s still hope for the U.S. Eventually, even the rubes figure out that they are getting taken.
If property rights were well protected perhaps they can explain all the kicked in doors and the removal of private property. We still have a long way to go. Ask the whites living around the Kahnawake reserve how strong their property rights are.
“Private property is well protected.”
Pure and utter BS! But outsiders think this Country is much that it is not, like our free health care. Too many non-Canadians believe we have this wonderful system where we can pick and choose our Doctors, specialist, or hospital, none of which is remotely true of how the system really works.
As for property rights, I’m sure everyone here remembers the disgraceful confiscation of the “Anne of Green Gables” business by the PEI Liberal government of Joe Ghiz,which Lucy Montgomery’s family only won after a protracted Court battle. They settled for 50% of the royalties,the PEI Liberal government took the other half in an instance of outright theft.
And with the integrity of our MSM, undoubtedly no one outside Canada has ever heard of High River.
Good points,JM and Peterj!
Joe Molnar,when are you going to start your cross-Country walk?
Who is the delusional twat who scores a 90 to a nation with no property rights entrenched in its highest legal document?
Stick a pin in the gas bag who produced this wet dream report card.
At this point in time and world situations as they are, you have to be a bit of an unthinking person to b1tch about conditions in Canada. Good luck in the quest for your idea of perfection.
So we can be thankful we aren’t africa yet – great consolation and a wonderful justification to sit on the couch and continue to watch the slide take more of your freedom and cash as it slides down the chute into the cesspit of history.
Perhaps the “unthinking” are those who think a slightly lower level of visible corruption than a despotism makes us as free as our fathers or grand fathers were.
In the “Government Spending” category Canada scores 47.3
A score of 50 or below ranks as “Repressed”. Edit: Sorry, rete, bad filter.
Yeah, why would anyone have a problem with warrantless entry being permitted into your home based on ownership of an object? I’m not talking High River, it’s in the firearms act.
I also happen to personally know someone who happens to be legal counsel for a city when it comes to expropriations, which happen on a fairly regular basis.
If you’re a ‘thinking’ person, you should have a problem with those things, and it shouldn’t matter what time or world situation it is.
In order for me to begin my “PROPERTY RIGHTS” petition walk I need a sponsor for a (loaner) mobile camper which I am not able to provide from my own resources.
I would prefer a private sponsor but will willingly accept directly CBC funded wheels, OR SIPHONED FROM THEIR BILLION DOLLAR taxpayer dollar pool would be the ideal!
Spoken like a true educator – satisfied with a peak in mediocrity.
Far better to be man discontented, than a hog contented.
Very well put!
Don’t forget reversing the ban on incandescent light bulbs. Environment Minister Joe Oliver’s contemptible article in the National Post on Dec. 20 sounded like a radical leftist screed, pretending to give Canadians “more choice” while taking it away. One major modus operandi of the left is to blur the distinction between freedom and coercion, and that’s what Oliver’s article did.
As for property rights, don’t forget that, thanks to Supreme Court decisions over the years, practically all our Charter rights have been eviscerated out of existence. Few of them are in any better shape than property rights.
Not perfectly on topic, but regarding our ‘free health care’ my wife got a call today from her regular physician about a specialists appointment for a knee problem serious enough to keep her off work.
She can see the specialist in SEPTEMBER for the initial consultation.
As always, you get what you pay for.
Pity it doesn’t really recognize that rule of law and property rights doesn’t apply to firearms owners in Canada.
Of course it should read “don’t apply”…pity there’s no edit capability here.
Excellent guide to work on the CPC platform for 2015. We might also consider trying to improve trade, military, and cultural cooperation with Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, and the UK.
5 of the top six are current or former British commonwealth countries
That’s the 10% property rights thier still working on.
If this survey was about SS Hail Redfraud from Alberta, of course corruption and property rights would be out the window.
Obviously.
But Neil Young hates Harper.
So Canada is currently wicked.
Sorry.
When you stop and consider that over 50% of Canadian voters actually think health care is free, that jobs can be created if the government just hired more people, and, windmills and solar panels dont need wind or the sun to produce electricity its amazing Mr Harper has lasted as long as he has and has done as much as he has.
Poke fun at Neil Young all you want, but, he pretty much represents over 50% of Canadians, and, that should scare us all.
PETITION TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS
IN PARLIAMENT ASSEMBLED
We, the undersigned citizens of Canada draw the attention of the House to the following: THAT : as individual Citizens of Canada WE do NOT enjoy the protection of “PROPERTY RIGHTS” within the Constitution of Canada ! hence, THE LAW of Canada!
THEREFORE: Your petitioners call upon Parliament to forthwith, incorporate and entrench FOREVER , individual “PROPERTY RIGHTS” INTO THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA.
Make no mistake about this….
Should the New Democratic Party gain elctoral power in Canada under the leadership of Thomas Mulcair, Canada will be a ….. defacto….. COMMUNIST state and ALL “PROPERTY RIGHTS” will belong to the communist state!!
Individual PROPERTY RIGHTS will be a pipe dream, and never again ….. REALITY!
There’s still hope for the U.S. Eventually, even the rubes figure out that they are getting taken.
“Private property is well protected. Enforcement of contracts is very reliable, and expropriation is highly unusual.”
What an absolute joke. Check the links.
http://canadianlandowneralliance.blogspot.ca/2014/01/and-you-thought-that-only-ipcc-sole.html
If property rights were well protected perhaps they can explain all the kicked in doors and the removal of private property. We still have a long way to go. Ask the whites living around the Kahnawake reserve how strong their property rights are.
“Private property is well protected.”
Pure and utter BS! But outsiders think this Country is much that it is not, like our free health care. Too many non-Canadians believe we have this wonderful system where we can pick and choose our Doctors, specialist, or hospital, none of which is remotely true of how the system really works.
As for property rights, I’m sure everyone here remembers the disgraceful confiscation of the “Anne of Green Gables” business by the PEI Liberal government of Joe Ghiz,which Lucy Montgomery’s family only won after a protracted Court battle. They settled for 50% of the royalties,the PEI Liberal government took the other half in an instance of outright theft.
And with the integrity of our MSM, undoubtedly no one outside Canada has ever heard of High River.
Good points,JM and Peterj!
Joe Molnar,when are you going to start your cross-Country walk?
Who is the delusional twat who scores a 90 to a nation with no property rights entrenched in its highest legal document?
Stick a pin in the gas bag who produced this wet dream report card.
At this point in time and world situations as they are, you have to be a bit of an unthinking person to b1tch about conditions in Canada. Good luck in the quest for your idea of perfection.
So we can be thankful we aren’t africa yet – great consolation and a wonderful justification to sit on the couch and continue to watch the slide take more of your freedom and cash as it slides down the chute into the cesspit of history.
Perhaps the “unthinking” are those who think a slightly lower level of visible corruption than a despotism makes us as free as our fathers or grand fathers were.
In the “Government Spending” category Canada scores 47.3
A score of 50 or below ranks as “Repressed”.
Edit: Sorry, rete, bad filter.
Yeah, why would anyone have a problem with warrantless entry being permitted into your home based on ownership of an object? I’m not talking High River, it’s in the firearms act.
I also happen to personally know someone who happens to be legal counsel for a city when it comes to expropriations, which happen on a fairly regular basis.
If you’re a ‘thinking’ person, you should have a problem with those things, and it shouldn’t matter what time or world situation it is.
In order for me to begin my “PROPERTY RIGHTS” petition walk I need a sponsor for a (loaner) mobile camper which I am not able to provide from my own resources.
I would prefer a private sponsor but will willingly accept directly CBC funded wheels, OR SIPHONED FROM THEIR BILLION DOLLAR taxpayer dollar pool would be the ideal!
Spoken like a true educator – satisfied with a peak in mediocrity.
Far better to be man discontented, than a hog contented.
Very well put!
Don’t forget reversing the ban on incandescent light bulbs. Environment Minister Joe Oliver’s contemptible article in the National Post on Dec. 20 sounded like a radical leftist screed, pretending to give Canadians “more choice” while taking it away. One major modus operandi of the left is to blur the distinction between freedom and coercion, and that’s what Oliver’s article did.
As for property rights, don’t forget that, thanks to Supreme Court decisions over the years, practically all our Charter rights have been eviscerated out of existence. Few of them are in any better shape than property rights.
Not perfectly on topic, but regarding our ‘free health care’ my wife got a call today from her regular physician about a specialists appointment for a knee problem serious enough to keep her off work.
She can see the specialist in SEPTEMBER for the initial consultation.
As always, you get what you pay for.