9 Replies to “Who’d A Thunk It?”

  1. Yes, but each time it has completely exonerated itself. So,that’s worth something. 😉

  2. Now, if this report had targeted the CBC, I’d be finishing a few sentences for you.
    “The Report found the broadcaster had been “slow” to catch up with public opinion…”
    …because it was obsessed with forming it.
    “We agree it is always vital to guard against unconscious bias or ‘group think’…”
    …so we urge all citizens to avoid Sun News, the National Post, and SDA.

  3. Contempt for the public would be more accurate. It’s a Liberal thing.

  4. Even with its secular,open borders, EU, collectivist statism, police statism, anti- conservative, pro globalist obvious bias, at least their news coverage is good, they do pieces on any event of note (good or bad to their “cause”) and although they spin it at east it’s covered, leaving Brits to filter through the scripted bias and get a modicum of truth on current events – and that is far more than we can say four our degenerate public broadcaster which filters news by omitting any news item which damages the utopian nanny state narrative they are concocting – how long did it take them to report on Shawinigate? climategate? Harper’s international successes? Obama scandals? Gun registry failures and budget overruns? Sll these stories were broken by other media operations.
    BBC til serves its news giver mandate whereas Mothercorpse has become a propaganda wing of the LPC and edits news to minimise damage to the LPC spin.

  5. Well put Occam. I’ve long wondered whether the Liberal Party was the political wing of the CBC or whether the CBC was the Propaganda arm of the Liberal Party. It has now been clarified in my mind.
    Thanks for that.
    Pat

  6. Exactly, and I figured that out about thirty years ago when it became really obvious during the Trudeau commissariat.

  7. Another whitewash, you have to look hard to find any criticism.
    Doesn’t even begin to address the insidious nature of the beast, its distortion and skewering of the broadcasting market both TV and radio, its foreign service, internet presence and involvement in the education process via the Open University, all peddling the same liberal socialism, its a self perpetuating monster that is a breeding ground, nursery and spewer of all things beloved of the fascists: progressiveness , permissiveness, internationalism, multiculturalism, secularism, socialism, diversity in-fact if its uttered by any branch of the Biased Broadcasting Corporation you can pretty much guarantee that like its Met Office weather forecasts its going to be shit.
    And Occam honest you think it serves its news mandate? I would counter that the reason that the UK is finished is because the shepple have no idea what is happening in the world, Obama is still the saviour, Middle East is only a mess because of those bloody Jews, and if we really want them too, someone might be able to reform the EU if we really think its necessary, but much more important is the fight against the science proven AGW scam, and yes I could go on for a long time. There is no filtering to be done because that would mean that somewhere there was a dissenting voice and you would even as a continuous user of just one of the services be hard pushed to find it.
    It has absolutely NO justification to exist which is why they have and continue to fight any other news media particularly Murdock as his empire offers a potential for a dissenting view, and that is something the Biased broadcasting Corporation wants to keep firmly in house, they vilified and slandered Lord Black and all that required was a National Newspaper that was becoming far to influential.
    Like all socialists and liberals the organisation demands power and its ability to harness shape and control the masses.
    It is the opium of the masses.

Navigation