16 Replies to “We Don’t Need No Stinking French Fry Grease”

  1. Huh. Off line for 15 months. Now off-line for nobody knows how long.Glad its renewable.Worst part though,the f*&kers are using FOOD. Tell me again how eco-cultists are it for the future? Yeah. Their money future and advancing the Useless Nations Agenda 21.

  2. Using food producing acres for growing grain for fuel should be a crime against humanity. But hey, aren’t there 6 billion people on earth, at least according to the human haters.

  3. Ken: I think “I” is “OK” aka “me” and various other nicknames he/she uses. The verbiage, spelling & grammar and incomprehesible nature of the posts have similar traits. I simply pass by them because I cannot possibly unravel whatever twisted logic may be contained therein.
    Dealing with the point of the thread (cue the “Jaws” theme here” what I believe we are seeing is the beginning of the death throes of the eco-nazi, global warming crowd. And they clearly know it. They are rapidly losing whatever credibility they might have had with the general population and with government. Sit back, grab a brew, asnd enjoy watching them fade into oblivion.

  4. Well, the Nazis figured out how to make bonfires out of human corpses, with little or no added fuel.

  5. What we’re seeing is mass insanity on a scale that is probably of historical precedent. Who in their right mind would convert food into fuel when there’s shale gas a plenty in Britain as well as nuclear power? I suppose if things get really hard up the proletariat can always drink the wheat alcohol to give them a feeling of being warm while they freeze to death in an alcoholic stupor. Then there’s the EU directives that prohibit the burying of dead animals. Most ranchers around where I live drag the carcass of a dead cow into an area of crown land where it is soon disposed of by the local wildlife leaving behind only a pile of clean bones.
    After having the worst weather in 50 years being charged 20 pounds/animal for disposal because that’s the way some moonbat eurocrat in Brussels thinks it’s the way to do it is just adding to the problems of farmers. If there were still any farmers with any balls left, the best thing to do would be to load up all of the dead animals into a convoy of trucks and dump them at the front entrance of the eurocratic agency which has come up with such idiotic legislation. Preferably once the animals were starting to rot and bloat.
    I suspect that the British menu in a few years time is going to feature roast watermelon washed down with a good helping of bioethanol. The only problem is what are the survivors going to do once they’ve eaten all of the moonbats and watermelons?

  6. We should commend the efforts of this progressive enterprise.
    No doubt, just like in their esteemed homeland, they are competing
    to produce ethanol on a free trade level playing field against
    massively efficient companies located in Brazil and elsewhere
    in the tropics. Thank goodness they are the ones trying to meet
    the challenge and not some rent seeking scamsters covering themselves
    with the holy raiment of Globull Warming while hiding behind trade
    embargoes and assorted political schemers.

  7. think bioethanol should move Ontario for hudak wonderful biodiesel
    Signed,
    Not I, ok, me

  8. I think it’s wonderful that you get the same welfare no matter where you live, Know why I?
    Because you don’t have to live there, MOVE!!!!! to where your awesome welfare dollars will get you more. Simple really.
    Or you could go get a haircut and get a J..O….B. *Gasp*

  9. Believe it or not I have a couple of leftwing friends, fair and balanced you know. Anyways one day our favourite out of work leftwing Professor was visiting and was on the usual rant about oil, carbon, devestation, how we should do more to become local, how would we carry on in event of collapse etc. I offered her a job rendering down black bear fat to make oil to run in my old VW diesel, a perfect solution in my eyes. The Prof got a job, I get natural Local fuel, cut down on nuisance bears etc. Albiet the job would be a sort of serf type job working for an evil Land Baron in the new age of austerity. The Prof was about to take a swig of my strong brewed coffee and almost drowned herself I almost fell off my chair laughing. The wife called me a b*stard. I was happy. Serf power, welfare bums housed in old granaries, hewing wood and drawing water for food……

  10. England looks more like North Korea every day. Except the NK’s aren’t covered with hideous tattoos and face piercings.

  11. What a sad end to the British Empire,it was deliberately orchestrated by their own left wing nut bars,the lefty euro-weenies and the UN no doubt whatever.

  12. Agreed. I am not sure, but loosing tens of thousands of good men that were probably the cream of the crop during two world wars did not help either.

  13. Using food producing acres for growing grain for fuel should be a crime against humanity…Posted by: Ken (Kulak) on April 3, 2013

    many years ago farmers figured out that growing many acres of corn and feeding it to meat animals provided more profit than selling the feed corn to the international humanitarian aid market. It was more profitable to grow meat for a domestic market than fed the starving billions.
    Is that a ‘crime against humanity’ ??
    Since then somebody figured out how to extract the corn sugar, and the processed mash was even more digestible for feed than raw corn.
    The corn sugar is immensely profitable. It ironically does feed the starving 3rd world with the billions of tons of junk food exported every year.
    Is it still a ‘crime against humanity’ ??
    Somebody also figured that cheap corn sugar could also make cheap alcohol to burn as fuel in cars. Not a good idea since it wastes as much energy as it produces, but then so do a lot of other things that people choose to buy.
    Is that what makes it a ‘crime against humanity’ ??

Navigation