Documents published online this month show that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, an organization known for its uncompromising animal-rights positions, killed more than 95 percent of the pets in its care in 2011.
h/t Ed S.
Documents published online this month show that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, an organization known for its uncompromising animal-rights positions, killed more than 95 percent of the pets in its care in 2011.
h/t Ed S.
Thought you’d like that one Kate. Puts things in perspective, doesn’t it?
PETA is run by and for psychotics.
It’s ok because they don’t do anything useful with the animals afterwards. They just chuck them in the trash.
I heard about this a while ago, but you missed the real story, which is buried midway down the article:
“Kovich also determined that PETA employees kill 84 percent of the animals in their custody within 24 hours of receiving them.”
Note this is despite their claim that they only kill animals that are sick, injured, or that “no good homes exist for”.
Their definition of a good home must be very interesting, indeed.
Of course the sick,perverted,leftard bast@rds/beyoitches kill them.If they had to feed,shelter,doctor,and set-up adoptions for them,it would cut into the money they need to pay themselves and propagandize kiddies and other leftard idjits.Maybe somebody knows as I couldn’t find it at their website…are they listed as a not-for-profit org under IRS guidelines?
They can’t afford clothes for the actresses in their commercials, how can they afford to keep and feed the animals.
mike
PETA has never been for animals. Thats just a fluffy excuse to hate all humanity.
Glad they don’t adopt stray homeless children.
This is rooted in the same sick ideology as abortion: it’s better to be dead than adopted or living in “foster care”…
We killed our Vietnam German Shepard Hero Combat Dogs so the Dinks wouldn’t eat them.
These Bastards destroyed their dogs/cats so they didn’t have to feed them.
Thanks for the article Kate,
My next donation will be a good cussing.
PETA
Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos.
We never considered the impact of these actions on the animals involved.
For whatever reason, you are now asking the question: Why should animals have rights? Read more.
Animals Are Not Ours to Eat
Animals Are Not Ours to Wear
Animals Are Not Ours to Experiment On
Animals Are Not Ours to Use for Entertainment
Animals Are Not Ours to Abuse in Any Way
WE KILL ANIMALS IN ORDER TO SAVE THEM..
People for the Efficient Termination of Animals.
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals
What Amy P said.
PETA is a sick organization supported by sick or deluded people.
It’s ok because they don’t do anything useful with the animals afterwards. They just chuck them in the trash.
But I was just reading that it’s not OK to have shark fins because after harvesting the fins, the fishermen throw the carcasses back into the ocean (where it’s recycled by carrion eaters).
So it’s OK to wantonly kill animals if you do so for no commercial purpose, but it’s not OK to do if you’re making any money from it?
I’d say I’m surprised, but this is the same type of intellectual consistency you see from them on abortion and capital punishment.
People
Euthanasing
Their
Animals
“People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, an organization known for its uncompromising animal-rights positions, killed more than 95 percent of the pets in its care in 2011.”
The modern age of politically charged culture is full of Orwellian misnomers,
we have animal humaine movements who kill animals,
we have peace keeping organizations who make war, we have homeland security laws which endanger civil liberty,
we have justice which ignores the crimes of certain groups but jails people for politically incorrect drawings their children make,
we have rights laws which restrict free speech and other rights,
we have transit authorities which limit fredom of mobility,
we have child welfare which abuses and traumatizes children,
We have family law which shatters families,
we have a free nation which is not free in any sense and getting more oppressive by the day.
It’s simply an age where you can’t believe any official label.
“Aww, what a nice fluffy bunny. I love you fluffy bunny, I love you, love you, love, you, you , you…….awe no fluffy bunny you made a mess all over my floor, now I need a new bunny”
Hmmm, in the last while I’ve helped “rehome” 30 dogs, fostered 15 and adopted five – can I have $7,000,000 as I’ve been more successful than PETA?
PETA; look under “misanthrope” in your dictionary.
Glad they don’t adopt stray homeless children.
Posted by: Fearless Leader at February 27, 2012 6:37 AM
They would if they had fur. Shows how living on Vegetables destroys the brain.
glock fluffy it the morning
glock fluffy in the night
glock fluffy all day long
till you git it right
Come now, all you have to do is recognize an animal’s right to die, and hey presto! you’ve got a legitimate animal rights group again. You can do it if you try.
Excuse me, I’m off to the slaughterhouse. Got some cows need assisting with their suicides…
Have you ever noticed these peta pukes will toss paint on some poor womans fur coat yet they don’t have the gonads to do it to my leather jacket, funny huh?
PETA uses the public’s compassion towards animals to advance its radical, anti-society agenda. It’s a tool to gain political power; nothing more or less.
Penn and Teller exposed this fact in their BS episode that aired on April 1, 2004:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inFtOMx8nDU