Someone came ready to play hardball.
Brent Bozell – “Cain is only one contender in the 2012 Republican field. Bill Clinton was president of the United States. But from Monday morning through Thursday morning, ABC, CBS and NBC ran 50 stories on the allegations against Cain. Now compare….“
Priceless – Former Washington Post editor discusses Cain sexual harassment story while pawing Daily Caller reporter.
Must bring back old memories in the Democrats. It’s been some time since they had a good N-word lynching. They do pick it up fast so it couldn’t have been too far back in their minds. The idea of a real black president scares the hell out of them.
So far,it’s working well for the progressives,they’ve deflected attention from Cain’s qualifications,and turned him into a man of questionable character.
Next step, find some liar to make the claim that she was a victim of Cain’s “suggestive” actions thirty or forty years ago,”he winked at me.I felt violated!”
Let’s hope the majority of Americans can see through this sham.
Scar >
Absolutely! They are scared sh*tless that Cain is visibly a much darker Negro than Obamba, which alone means pulling at least million apologist white votes or more away from Obamba.
Obviously this black only trend will be widely accepted in Canada. Since there does not appear to be any Negro candidates that I am aware of here, we should be scouring Kenya and other parts of Africa for our next PM after Harper. A guaranteed slam dunk, the NDP would be jumping out of windows at the confusion.
Please! Let’s be fair. Bradley didn’t “paw” anyone.
I’m a conservative who has support for Herman Cain and I dislike Bradley’s newspaper but do we have to sink to the low level of the “progressives” to counter a questionable charge against Mr Cain? Ridiculous, to say the least.
dmorris:
Cain’s position as leading candidate for the Republicans has opened up even more over Romney.
Therefore, the Americans can see through this sham.
Also on Rasmussen, Obama’s rating is now at minus-23.
I’ll leave it up to you to determine which side is winning.
BCer:
Correct. Bradley put his hand on the reporter’s shoulder briefly.
But maybe that was the point … seems it’s more than what Cain did.
Wow. The Clarence Thomas bit is powerful stuff.
Bozell hits the ball out of the park.
Total and complete duplicity on the part of the ABCNNBCBS cabal.
The Cain smear is at least 50% racial, the other 50% being political, the combination of black and Republican (which the media erroneously consider conservative). Switch either of those variables and the story goes to the bottom left corner of page 12.
He put his arm around her, and stuck his face right into her chest.
BCer >
“Bradley didn’t “paw” anyone”.
Exactly! Now what if that had been Cain, a Negro with his hand on the white reporter? It would have been a scandal across the Liberal Left MSM spectrum.
It’s a good point, Clinton weathered much worse scandals than Cain has. Mind you Clinton didn’t have a habit of shooting himself in the foot as regularly as Cain does.
For a good laugh I’d reccomend typing Perry Drunk into youtube. It’s hilarious.
Mark at November 4, 2011 1:42 PM
You’re absolutely correct. The vitriol against Cain has two components.
1) Democrats cannot allow the Black community to starting thinking of the Republican Party as an acceptable alternative. The Dems have had the “Black Vote” locked up for decades and they keep that voting bloc by telling Blacks that the only thing that stands between them and the reinstitution of slavery is the Democrat party. If the Dems lose control of the Black Vote, they can’t win elections.
2) The Democrats have to make an example of Cain. Others in the Black community must be shown what happens when a Black man or woman steps off the Democrat plantation. Utter and complete destruction, both personally and professionally.
I agree with BCer about the characterization of Ben Bradlee as “pawing” the reporter. That sort of physical contact with others is, in my experience, common among men of his generation, and it wouldn’t surprise me to see him doing it to male reporters, as well.
I do have complete contempt for the “reporting” that’s been done about Herman Cain’s alleged behavior. Some of the folks doing it would still be denying that Bill Clinton did anything if Monica Lewinsky hadn’t held onto that blue dress.
If Herman Cain came to power and became the equivalent to the black Ronald Reagan of sorts…The after Carter effect redux…And the economy starts kicking back up again, then indeed the Democratic party along with hundreds of spokespersons and organisations like Jesse Jackson, Acorn, the Black Panthers, Affirmative Action etc…might get irreparable damage to their way of life down the road.
Herman Cain right now, is the most dangerous man for Elite Establishment America and for many who have made race and minorities their bread and butter for too many decades already.
Indeed the lynching is only beginning and will only get uglier.
IMO, because Herman Cain is a black American right wing, all private sector success story, this makes him even more dangerous to the enemies of “We, the People” than Sarah Palin ever was.
Go Herman, go! (But watch your back, literally)
Well, I didn’t see any pawin’…but I think those guys better stick to Bud Light and stay away from real Canadian beer…’ick…
knight99 wrote:
Quote: “Bradley didn’t “paw” anyone.
Exactly! Now what if that had been Cain, a Negro with his hand on the white reporter? It would have been a scandal across the Liberal Left MSM spectrum.
Unquote
Thank you for making my point, knight. He isn’t white and she ain’t black so why do we feel it necessary to use their immoral techniques to counter their ridiculous and unfounded charges against Cain? To write that the person being interviewed “pawed” the reporter is a stupid, silly thing to state and serves only to weaken the support for Cain.
A PolitiKKKo lynching.
Brought to you by the elites’ need to keep everyone in their place.
Their wallets, tenure opportunities, and their concept of self depend on it.
@1:07 he’s got his head in her shirt.
“Politico publishes 90 stories on Cain scandal”
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/politico-publishes-90-stories-cain-scandal
Ahem. That’s pawing in my books.
C’mon Kate…it wasn’t ‘pawing’ pawing… sarc/
The drunken buffoons had all the lines down pat…’can’t get away with that in this town’…unless you are a Dem.
Anybody remember when that lady, Paula something, came forward during the Lewinski fracas and said she’d been sexually molested by Bill Clinton? The media/entertainment complex sure spent a lot of time on …. mocking her claims. And her looks.
It’s great to be a Democrat!
Coming up to a young woman, doing her job which is interviewing, and firs thing you do is put your arm across her back would get a man slapped by a women’s libber. Possibly yelled at.
That is in their books “pawing”.
If I had been the young woman I’d have been inwardly cringing. It’s inappropriate.
Nothing intended, just that he’s of the age when white men did do that frequently, especially after a couple of drinks.
But the women libbers wouldn’t care if it was unintentional.
They’d have nailed him.
If he’d been black, a double whammie.
gellen >
“If I had been the young woman I’d have been inwardly cringing. It’s inappropriate.”
Definitely inappropriate, but I highly doubt this MSM media woman was cringing in any way, shape or form. Honestly, call me sexist, but viewing her “look”, I’d have thought she was a porn actress, or some bimbo from Naked News doing a skit until told otherwise.
I love it-
Any candidate will tell you that having his name continually in front of the voters- good or bad-
or on television is the best thing that can happen to a politician.
The stupid Democrats are giving Cain millions of dollars worth of free coverage and viewers.
Obama has nothing, is nothing, but a joke and an empty suit.
I plan to vote for Romney, or Cain,
if he wins the nomination.
Romney dressed in his magic underwear beats the hell out of Obama in his clown suit..
This is why Colin Powell did not teke the bait and run for office. Too smart … not willing to make himself a target for a mob.
I would like to see these people’s definition of sexual harasment, and then have a full description of what the complaints were all about, as I’v seen quite a bit of flurting in corporate settings. Some of this flurting goes to far and generates complaints
Honestly, call me sexist, but viewing her “look”, I’d have thought she was a porn actress, or some bimbo from Naked News doing a skit until told otherwise.
Oh for God’s sake. That is not the look of a ‘porn star’. It’s an attractive young woman, asking pertinent questions on behalf of the organization she works for. I see nothing to indicate that she is looking for more than answers to her questions which is probably a pretty disquieting task given that she’s likely entered a political viper’s nest full of old drunk journalists trying to relive their glory years.
So yeah, let me be the first, “You are a sexist”.
Jan >
“You are a sexist”.
Thanks for clarifying that.
“I see nothing to indicate that she is looking for more than answers to her questions…”
Neither did I 🙂
It is worth remembering who brought us the high-tech lynching of Clarence Thomas – Joe Biden acting on behalf of radical leftists posing as advocates for women. The Democrats are too frightened to attack Cain directly, so their fifth column in the Washington press corps does the dirty work.
Great Cain ad; I’m glad I sent him a contribution the other day.
Bradlee displays the same lack of courtesy as the self-important thugs in the Capitol who consider themselves nature’s ruling class. And journalists have no idea why they are repellent to so many of the public at large.
It is worth remembering who brought us the high-tech lynching of Clarence Thomas – Joe Biden acting on behalf of radical leftists posing as advocates for women.
Part of a Post by: small c conservative at November 4, 2011 9:22 PM
That’s who I thought was there too. Once an “asswipe always a asswipe”.
I am really tired of the saying that “the dems, left, liberals are scared of the right and republicans”. They are not scared. They know exactly what they are doing.
Practiced perveyors of blood politics, they can do what they please and it will be ignored right up to and including Mr. Clinton’s crimes, and crimes they were.
Both personal and political. He lost his license to practice law and almost lost his presidency.
IF it had not been for a cowardly Republican senate who prided themselves on ‘bi-partisan’ negotiations, Clinton would have been removed from office.
Trent Lott traded his ethics for political expediency and betrayed his party, house Republicans and the nation with his deal with the dems. Where did THAT get him?-
The Democrats are in this to win this every time. It is war and they take no prisoners. Republicans, on the other hand ( and Conservatves in Canada to a certain extent) want to be LIKED for Gawd’s Sake!-
In politics they simply do not have the killer instinct. Boehner is a PERFECT example of it. It is a position of weakness, not strength.
In these times we need to focus on what is important. Ben Bradlee pawing and gawking is a symbol of all that is wrong with the feeding frenzy from the left concerning Herman Cain: Dems can do what they please. When they please.
NOone else can.
Frankly, it does not matter who it is, they seek to destroy and will consider all means and measures to accomplish it.
Herman Cain might as well be Sarah Palin. Except for the fact that he is a man and black and the situation is so similar to Clarence Thomas it hawks back to that time, he is getting a much easier go of it that Sarah did.
They chased her from the national scene and then undertook to destroy her personally and politically in Alaska.
The Dems ARE the dogs of war and will viciously attack ANYONE and everyone who gets in their way.
This is not about the truth or an election, it is about the country.
The democrats,marxists, socialists have it by the throat and they will not let go until the throat of what was the Republic of America is torn out.
Until we realize the nature of the fight we cannot win that fight. But it MUST be won.
They have worked toward their aims for 80 years and we are simply not up to speed.
This has just begun and the streets will run red before it is over.
And it is coming here. It has already started.
Ahem. That’s pawing in my books.
~Kate
Case closed.
A champion dog breeder like Kate knows pawing when she sees it.
It is worth remembering who brought us the high-tech lynching of Clarence Thomas – Joe Biden acting on behalf of radical leftists posing as advocates for women.
Part of a Post by: small c conservative at November 4, 2011 9:22 PM
That’s who I thought was there too. Once an “asswipe always a asswipe”.
Merle
Now it might explain why Biden was chosen for VP by the community organizer…What a sack of sh*t that half cracker is!
The paws that refreshes…