United States Of Obamica: Not Broke Enough!

Now is the time at SDA when we juxtapose!
June 9th, 2010US debt to hit 19.6 trillion by 2015.
June 10th, 2010Obama said the conditions in Gaza were “unsustainable” and promised 400 million U.S. dollars to aid the Gaza Strip
Related – Obama job approval at all time low. And most of them haven’t even heard about the $400m donation to Hamas.

56 Replies to “United States Of Obamica: Not Broke Enough!”

  1. The USA should be proud of their President in promising this much needed humanitarian aid to Gaza. I am sure the shills for Israel will howl against this, as will all of the Israel apologists, however, cry me a river, this aid is needed. I am sure there will be comments from the peanut gallery, right Mikey A.

  2. Obama calls everything nowadays ‘unsustainable’. The Gulf crisis is ‘unsustainable’, the healthcare crisis is ‘unsustainable’, blah blah blah.
    HE is unsustainable. GONE in 2012 or sooner. ‘
    Worst
    President
    Evah!

  3. That DEBT is unsustainable. How nice of him to be so generous with China’s money….

  4. If I may make one small request, T – please don’t ever leave us. You speak more eloquently for the vapid left than a hundred links to Kos ever could.

  5. “All that Communism needs to make it successful is for someone to feed and clothe it.”

  6. I still think that “Fake T” is a fake of a fake. I can’t believe that there is a real T who is as stupid as this poster seems to be.
    Why doesn’t China just give the aid to Gaza directly? Not a sparrow falls to the Earth but that Obama throws millions of dollars of other people’s money at it.

  7. What’s 400 million made up, backed by nothing dollars to a nation that owes over 13 trillion made up, backed by nothing dollars? A trillion, by the way, is a million, million dollars so this is just a drop in the bucket of made up, backed by nothing dollars.
    I suppose it’s to help a made up, backed by nothing Palestinian nation.

  8. 1000 trucks of supplies and aid flow into Gaza each and every day right now. They have just built a luxuries which we in the west would be proud of.
    This is nothing more that socialist wealth distribution, and doing so by poking a stick in the American taxpayer’s eye! Poke them enough times and they go blind!

  9. The vapid left? I am sure you meant to say right. With almost 2/3 of Canadian voters actually supporting a left of center party and only 1/3 electing a CON, I would not be so quick to call the left vapid. More like the left having sound social policies. As I told Mikey A. come on over to the left/socialist side, things are so much clearer when one is “right”. That notwithstanding, I’ll never leave, too many right wing false ideologies, rhetoric, pap, and propaganda to correct.

  10. With almost 2/3 of Canadian voters actually supporting a left of center party …
    Sounds like coalition time. Go for it!

  11. This ob jackass doesn’t deserve to be called president.
    he’s a trojan horse, a closet muzzy.
    in my opinion out to destroy the u.s. and doing a dam fine job of it.
    sure be nice to see the yanks run him and his cronies out of there on the end of a bayonett.
    and the israel’s better check that aid for sure.

  12. “With almost 2/3 of Canadian voters actually supporting a left of center party and only 1/3 electing a CON, I would not be so quick to call the left vapid”
    T
    Funny how the Lieberals want sometimes be called a centrist party and sometimes a leftist party when it suits the narative.
    After opinion polls across the nation gone horribly wrong, the Libs are calling the coalition talks nothing but rumour today. Too late, the damage is already done and the Con TV adds are already being prepared and this will hurt the Libs big time next election.
    So, T, I truly wish the Libs and NDP would merge (Before election call) and see what your 2/3 theory would result in after an election.
    The vast majority of Canadians hold centrist values and until the Liberals stop wobbling and truly reaffirm it’s platform at the centre where the Cons have positioned themselves successfully they are dead meat.

  13. Here’s Arthur Laffer speaking about some of those “sound social policies” of the Left that T is on about. Like the perennial favorite, “tax the rich”.
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704113504575264513748386610.html
    Short version of this very worthy article: Bush tax cuts end on Jan 1 2011. Rich people and corporations are front-loading as much income and profit as possible to -this- year. Yes, this year with the 10% unemployment. If Barry just sits still and does nothing, next year is going to be… interesting.
    That the kind of “sound social policy” you were talking about, T? Its like seeing the iceberg and yelling out “RAMMING SPEED!!!”

  14. Even the Europeans are moving away from their failed socialist model. But it may be too late for them. Fortunately Canada doesn’t have to go down that path.

  15. Oz, I checked out that link. How do they expect to attack Israelis, with candy and pies? I didn’t see a single weapons merchant! They are DESPERATE for supplies of weapons. Clothing, food, candy, they got lots.

  16. And people still aren’t convinced Obama is against American interests?
    People are out of work and out of money. A grave environmental disaster angers more people than Iranian students being shot in the streets or the Korean peninsula on the edge of war. The Palestinians want Israelis to be driven into the sea. And what does Obama do? Give them money that the Americans could truly use.
    I will be so glad when he is out of office.

  17. re: “I still think that “Fake T” is a fake of a fake. I can’t believe that there is a real T who is as stupid as this poster seems to be.”
    Nuh-uh. Reality has a liberal bias. Stephen Colbert said so. I propose that ALL OF YOU are fakes.
    It’s quite simple:
    1. Reality has a liberal bias.
    2. Most commenters on SDA have a conservative bias.
    3. Therefore, most commenters on SDA are not real.
    Aw who am I kidding, T can’t follow a logical argument through to it’s conclusion. I’m a terrible fake.

  18. “The USA should be proud of their President in promising this much needed humanitarian aid to Gaza.”
    We should? I am an American taxpayer and this action infuriates me. We are in the midst of an economic meltdown with mountains of debt. We cannot afford to go around the world doling out “aid”. If you are so interested in co-opting the plight of the Palestinians, use your own damn money.

  19. Let us not mock “the big owe” too much. I have heard that we give substantial aid to China.

  20. grok @ 3:10, the cream pies, especially, should do the trick. That candies? Well they must have run out of big rocks by now.

  21. The bell rings and the dog slobbers.
    I swear if Kate posted a “T is really smart” blog entry, T’s first comment would read “T’s a moron”.
    T, you do realize Kate can make you wrong on any subject she chooses – you’re a long since nuetered, hydrophobied minature snauzer in a cage stacked on the back of a dodge powerwagon, your pathetic take is poured out of an Old Roy economy bag.
    But don’t go changin.

  22. KevinS says: “…. I am an American taxpayer and this action infuriates me. We are in the midst of an economic meltdown with mountains of debt. We cannot afford to go around the world doling out “aid”.”
    ………..
    So does that mean they should cut the billions they send in aid Israel every year? Or the $2 billion they send to Egypt every year to bribe them to not attack Israel?

  23. Centre left coalition, my foot!
    Communism is dead. Socialism euro-style has AIDS. Social democracy Canadian-style is HIV positive, it can be kept alive until the money runs out. There ain’t nowhere for lefties to go except public sector
    unions – and when the government is bankrupt?

  24. I’m surprised not everyone has got T pegged for what it is. It deliberately takes the 180 point of view to see what reaction it can evoke. (Black is white; night is dark; leftists are intelligent, etc).
    You know, like that neighbour’s mangy cur who sneaks through the fence into your flowerbed, looks furtively around, takes a dump, circles around it a couple of times, smells it, and with a satisfied smirk of approval disappears into the shrubbery; watching and waiting for somebody to step in it!
    Then does his stupid little laugh, you know like that cartoon dog “Muttley” (appropriately enough named).
    Ah T, you’re so predictable. 😀

  25. “So does that mean they should cut the billions they send in aid Israel every year? Or the $2 billion they send to Egypt every year to bribe them to not attack Israel?”
    I suspect you’re posing this as a “gotcha” question, but my answer is an emphatic yes. The American people never signed up to be the world’s caretakers. We should have listened to Washington’s parting advice, “avoid entangling alliances”.

  26. I did mean that as a gotcha question, and I’m pleasantly surprised by your position. These entanglements will only drag us down. The US is teetering on bankruptcy. Foreign aid should be the first spending to be cut off.

  27. You can all luagh if you want. Seems to me though that things went bad for Obama & his band of thieves when they made made Israel an enemy. Than falling over backwards for the Faustian neon-Palestinians, with American tax dollars.
    JMO

  28. Israel GDP per capita: USD 30,000
    Israel Population: 7.5 million
    US Aid to Israel: 2.8 billion
    US Aid to Israel per capita: USD 373
    Palestinian Territories GDP per capita: USD 3,000
    Palestinian Territories Population: 4.1 million
    US aid to Palestine: 400 million
    US aid to Palestine per capita: USD 100
    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”
    I like the “all men are created equal” bit. Who needs the money more?
    Jus sayin, dawg, jus sayin.

  29. “You can all luagh if you want. Seems to me though that things went bad for Obama & his band of thieves when they made made Israel an enemy. Than falling over backwards for the Faustian neon-Palestinians, with American tax dollars.”
    Amen.
    This explains Barack’s decision to increase US AID to Israel by USD 225 million (to a total of USD 2.775 billion) for 2010.
    The Juxtaposers here should consider analyzing the facts before drawing any conclusions. For what its worth, the self-congratulatory tone echoing around this thread reminds me of communist party discussions in Soviet Russia. Dogma as fact. Ideology as reality. Very Stalin-esque.
    jus sayin, dawg, jus sayin.

  30. “I did mean that as a gotcha question, and I’m pleasantly surprised by your position. These entanglements will only drag us down. The US is teetering on bankruptcy.”
    Brick60
    So let me get this straight, you’re saying that since bad policies are already in place and are “dragging us down” that we should implement more bad policies to drag us down further and faster.
    Gotcha!

  31. “Copy cat do this, do that;
    wanna do something do this;
    chicky chaka chubaka;
    gitty getty gotcha…” Busta Rhymes

  32. just say’n
    Aid to a strategic and traditional ally is not analogous to sending aid to an enemy.
    Palestinians are accountable for their government who is in no uncertain terms the enemy of the USA, and America’s ally Israel.
    Perhaps this isn’t an “echo chamber”, but instead a common sense chamber, and therefore most people intuitively come to the same position.
    just say’n

  33. more…
    So the view that foreign aid is poor policy is a valid POV, but analogizing aid to Israel is the same as aid to Hamas as an arguement is just bull isht.

  34. jus’sayin, you conveniently forget to mention why Israel gets $2.8 Billion annually from the US. It was the President Jimmy Carter’s chequebook diplomacy which also gave Egypt $1.3 Billion annually in military aid and approximately $.8 Billion annually in economic, humanitarian, and other aid.
    The US is not by law obligated to give Hamas/Fatah/Palestinian Authority anything but they must give Israel and Egypt money as part of the Camp David Accords. Nothing to do with per capita funding what so ever.
    jus sayin facts……

  35. “Aid to a strategic and traditional ally is not analogous to sending aid to an enemy.”
    As is amply evident in the fact that Israel can use US AID in any manner it likes – including for the purchase of weapons. US aid to Palestine, on the other hand, comes in the form of goods, not hard cash.
    Besides, you’re missing the point. If the average Israeli is earning USD 30,000 annually, why is the US taxpayer supplementing his income by USD 400. Incidentally, it is more than the US allots as aid for its own states – the exception being Alaska, which gets over USD 1,000 for each citizen. Michigan gets under USD 30 if I’m not mistaken.
    “Palestinians are accountable for their government who is in no uncertain terms the enemy of the USA, and America’s ally Israel.”
    I see. And the North Koreans are accountable for Kim Jong Il. Political groups do have a tendency to get on top and consolidate power (witness Harper’s PMO – the most powerful PMO since Trudeau). At what point do the people stop being accountable? And at what point do they end up falling hostage to the monster they created? Because I think it is fair to say that the North Korean people did support Kim Il Sung once. Suffice to say, they don’t have a choice now. Factor in Stockholm syndrome, and you have a real mess.
    The question is when do we look past groups and look towards individuals. Western civilization is based on individual rights. Why, then, should we be pumping money into a state that really doesn’t need any, while complaining about some necessities thrown into an impoverished region. The questions I am posing are not simple ‘gotchas’. They hint at the complexity of the situation at hand – one which few in this echo chamber will ever give thought to.
    “So the view that foreign aid is poor policy is a valid POV, but analogizing aid to Israel is the same as aid to Hamas as an arguement is just bull isht.”
    I somehow doubt that US Aid to Palestine is handed over to Hamas. It comes in the form of medicines etc that are handed over to NGOs like Red Cross et al to administer. You’re missing key facts about this whole thing.
    But please, don’t let that distract you from your belief in, and support for, collective punishment. Collective punishment has worked a treat in the past. Its a pity enlightenment thinkers concluded that collective punishment can lead to mass atrocities. They must have been wrong. The people who suffered the collective punishment deserved it. Try explaining it to the Armenians.

  36. Here you go, misguided soul: T is a moron
    And yet he sees the good Mr. Obama does much more clearly than any of you. He has managed to repair 8 years of GWB cowboy politics in record time. Bravo, sir. Such intellectual clarity when it comes to economics and the Middle East was well overdue.

  37. “The US is not by law obligated to give Hamas/Fatah/Palestinian Authority anything but they must give Israel and Egypt money as part of the Camp David Accords. Nothing to do with per capita funding what so ever.”
    Their is no commitment on providing it forever. It can be cancelled at any time.

  38. Yet is has been thirty years and the money still flows….that Egypt lobby on K-Street must be pretty powerful.
    I would agree with you collective punishment does not work. Would you agree that Israel should open the air / land / sea borders with Gaza / Westbank on the condition that for every unguided missle / rocket / mortar / suicide bomber from Hamas / Fatah, that Israel must respond with 100 precision guided bombs to the homes of Hamas / Fatah leaders. Let make the punishment personal. Are you cool with that?

  39. Indian Homez:
    “So let me get this straight, you’re saying that since bad policies are already in place and are “dragging us down” that we should implement more bad policies to drag us down further and faster.”
    …….
    Uh… I said that? I said the US need to cut back on spending and first should be foreign aid. Borrowing from the Chinese to fund Israel, Egypt, Gaza, Pakistan, etc., is a waste of money. By law, one has to pay taxes. I don’t see in the Constitution where it says Americans are obligated to fund foreign governments with aid money.

  40. “So does that mean they should cut the billions they send in aid Israel every year? Or the $2 billion they send to Egypt every year to bribe them to not attack Israel?”
    I interpreted this comment as justifying and supporting the 400b to Gaza if the other money is going elsewhere. If this isn’t the case, then my bad; and, I wanted to quote Busta.

  41. This is bad, but not that bad. The US already sends billions to Egypt as a ‘peace bribe’ and gives tons of money to the UN, which in turn forks it over to the PA and other evil entities. The US also poison Israel with aid, which just makes Israel less economically free (as is the case with all aid recipients). There is a large number of Israeli intellectuals who think Israel should forgo the aid.

Navigation