Meaning We “Nearly” Got A Liberal-Led Government

“[Prime Minister Stephen Harper] miscalculated, with nearly catastrophic results for the country…” – Determinedly determined Michael “Everything I Know About Canada I Learned From The New York Times” Ignatieff

55 Replies to “Meaning We “Nearly” Got A Liberal-Led Government”

Layton took Canadians to the cleaners when he demanded input into Paul Martin’s budget.
Iggy isn’t a very fast learner if he thinks it will be any different in a coalition.

With the facination some cdns have for O it is no wonder they welcome Iggy. He is a very american type politician-supported Iraq till against it, supports torture in some cases, very messy divorce, ignores political theft.
He will never be idolized like O is, and that love will change very soon.
How the media and liberals are going to do a 180 re bashing the USA and try to be believed will be fun to watch.
I still think Iggy is Kerrys lost twin.

wow now we have a Liberal leader that is pro war in Iraq and pro torture, thankfully Harper dosn’t share all those points.

LindaL;
In and of itself, that one spends time thinking is not a sign of intelligence. Morons spend every bit as much time thinking as do you or I. It is the conclusions arrived at and the actions taken that give away intelligence or stupidity.
As a result of Iggy’s news conference, Harper can now quote him as saying that he signed onto something he believed would end in catastrophe. That was not smart on Iggy’s part, not in signing on in the first place, and especially by walking in front of the cameras so his cop to the plea could be recorded for posterity.
Indeed Iggy spends a lot of time thinking. How much of it is quality time is open to question. I have a theory about why people think he’s smart. Its the eyebrows. They make his head look bigger than it is.