97 Replies to ““Why Do They Hate Us?””

  1. ATHEIST or mostly people who are not believe god are lie so much they also not scared of superpower of god
    people who are not belive god are :
    can be Atheist Indain original or hindo or Sikh or teh group of people who say they belive the god but their act are proof they are not belive god and not fear for gor and not mercy of anything
    if you not fear of god and not beleive god you do crime
    so many people even may say they are christian but still do crime because in thier heart never think of god once a day and not fear of god
    people who do not bleive god called Kafer in Islam and fight them
    people who say they belive god in their heart they are lying are two faces are worst than Kafer
    since reconginze Kafer is eay
    but recognize the persons say I bleive god but in private do anything god forbid them they are called in islam ‘Monafeq’
    Monafeq are worst than Kafer
    house of god to worship god should get attacked by any people who rejected the god
    these way and method scared peopel for their bleif
    in india people scared to go to mosque or get recognizew tehy will kill them too this is hate
    hate of evil over innocent people
    I had known on Indian candain I asked him what you are doing he said he is praying I said you do not bleive god who you praying for he did not answer but evil EYES is acceptable in all religion
    which is evil sprirtual and some Atheic song is scary to me while tehy could think and concentrate peopel in evil way too
    all religion should concentrate to let china India and origianl indaian in Canada and USA become beliver of god even not like to become christian or Jews or Muslim it does not matter
    if we encourage people belive god adn fear of god the city is more safe and less crime

  2. Paul: “There is no reality … it’s only what you make reality to be.”
    You truly are stupid.
    My point is, there is reality, and then there’s your (flawed) interpretation of it.

  3. Why do you folks bother with the likes of Petee and QE?At any point in a debate they could come up with “OH Yea Wanna Bet” and truly think they win the debate.

  4. Peter D.: “So getting back to the actual substance of the article – the guy has Hannity and O’Reilly books (and no doubts trolls Little Green Footballs), listen’s to Limabaugh et al, goes and kills Liberals, yet you guys see no connection between the way the left is characterized in the right wing media/blogosphere and the killings?”
    No, not unless there was also a lot more violence against right-wingers due of the left’s demonization of the right.
    As I recall, the killing of Pim Fortuyn was an isolated event, and this one probably is too.
    P. S. As an atheist I’d wager that any criticism one could make of the Qur’an regarding condoning violence could be applied to the Bible too.

  5. Rob C: “At any point in a debate they could come up with ‘OH Yea Wanna Bet’ and truly think they win the debate.”
    Sort of like how Paul came up with ‘You lose’ a few comments above, eh?

  6. nv53:”P. S. As an atheist I’d wager that any criticism one could make of the Qur’an regarding condoning violence could be applied to the Bible too.”
    I have to disagree. It’s been a long time since a Christian Holy Man issued a decree condemning a critic to death. Biblical violence is also relegated for the most part to what is known as the Old Testament. And yes there are self proclaimed Christian clerics who subscribe to violence but they are very much on the fringes of the religion and do not, for example, command whole countries. They also are condemned by the mainstream Faith.

  7. How anyone could read this thread and come to the conclusion that a partisan party system is a good thing for democracy is beyond me.
    What a neverending, utterly pointless bunch of rhetorical bullshit.
    Sigh.

  8. Honestly, this post makes me feel dirty after reading it. I do not care what the motivations were for killing people, it is WRONG.

  9. That a out of work, loner, decides to kill strangers in a public place and chooses a group with whom he has some ideological disagreement can be explained.
    When the first such kind of public hostage/skyjackings occurred in the late 1960s or early 70s many were shot by FBI SWAT teams. The ones that were captured or did not die where interviewed by an Psychiatrist(a Dr. Hubbard if memory serves) to find out what they were thinking.
    They were despondent, lonely and considering suicide and viewed themselves as failures in life.
    The public hostage takings/skyjackings with the attending sensationalized media coverage made them feel important for a few minutes. Even having someone else kill them was seen by them as saving them the unpleasant task of killing themselves.
    The FBI psychiatrist approached the major media editors and explained his findings. He asked only that they refrain from sensationalized coverage. Largely, they complied and the skyjacking/hostage takings dropped off dramatically. Yes, there was a time when major media had a conscience and took responsibility for their work.
    Now with continent wide media providing highly sensationalized, saturation coverage they guarantee the despondent loser fifteen minutes of fame. And then failing to admit their own role in “if it bleeds, it leads” policies they look for a favourite scapegoat to blame. Until recently they blamed citizen access to firearms and advocated N.Y.C./Washington, D.C./Chicago style gun control.
    As that has lost it’s credibility to a U.S. citizenry that refused to give in, and also to a Supreme Court confirming a Constitutional Right.A new version of the scapegoat appears. This story tries to lay blame on conservative ideology implying that is a threat to public safety, thereby exploiting the deaths of innocents at the hands of a sociopathic loser.
    The most famous Canadian copycat example was Gamel Gharbi, the son of an Algerian, Muslim wife beater who shot and stabbed 13 women to death in Montreal in 1989. The only journalist who continues to refer to him by his birth name is Mark Steyn. In order to exploit that incident for a radical, anti-male, activists agenda they only refer to him as Mark Lepine and pretended he was a typical Canadian male.
    Mainsteam major media types view their job as ideological warfare rather than a profession with the highest value on a search for the truth and the facts. By abandoning a reasoned and balanced presentation they have made blogging journalists like Michael Totten, Yon, etc the highest form of that profession.
    Irony abounds, but largely only in the blogisphere.

  10. Kate, do you ever get tired of 98% missing the point of your posts. Collective got it fairly early on, but I guess troll baiting is more fun. (I have to admit – I missed it at first too, thanks Collective. James, if you feel dirty – go back a bit a try to get the point – ie 9/11, root causes etc.

  11. Churches and Schools are prime targets for armed nutters because they are guaranteed target rich environments of unarmed victims.
    This ass would have gotten how far at a civilian gun range?

  12. And the guy who shot up Virginia Tech hated the Roman Catholic Church and Bush. Does that make you responsible for that, PeterD? You’d better turn yourself over to the cops, then.

  13. Larry: “The only journalist who continues to refer to him by his birth name is Mark Steyn. In order to exploit that incident for a radical, anti-male, activists agenda they only refer to him as Mark Lepine and pretended he was a typical Canadian male.”
    Ever consider the possibility that Mark Steyn similarly exploits that incident for his own radical, anti-Muslim, activist agenda by only referring to Lepine as Gamil Gharbi? Oh right, Steyn speaketh the truth, while all other journalists whisper only lies.
    Why is Adkisson just a guy who went crazy and killed a bunch of people, while Garbi/Lepine is the son of an wife-beating, child-beating, Algerian Muslim immigrant who grew up and killed a bunch of people? Why can’t he just be crazy too?

  14. Re: Knoxville massacre: Prepare to puke your guts out:
    “Ghetto Bragging Rights Unplugged gossip columnist Clarence Star has learned, in a desperate attempt to resurrect her career, Britney Spears may be considering playing the alleged Knoxville carjacking victim, Channon Christian, in NigleryMedia’s forecoming movie about the January 2007 crime.
    Spears, who is said to have visited the house on Chipman street where Christian’s rape and murder allegedly took place, is believed to be very excited about the role.
    “She likes the sex scenes,” a source close to the Spears camp says. “She likes the script and the concept.”

    “We’re producing it from the perspective that Channon Christian orchestrated the whole thing. Britney taking the role of Channon Christian is also very exciting. She is a very sexual person. The public will appreciate seeing her in this role. It is guranteed to revitalize her career,” a source close to the production said.
    The more here is that it is now being reported that celebrity felon St. Nicolas Thief , who held the pro carjacker rally, may have signed on board the project to play the character of the carjacking ring leader, Lemaricus Davidson.”
    blackface.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/britney-relives-channon-christians-black-gang-rape-in-new-movie-the-knoxville-carjacking/
    Yeah, I trust the media to report potentially incendiary stories in an honest manner. *SNEER*

  15. nv53: “As an atheist I’d wager that any criticism one could make of the Qur’an regarding condoning violence could be applied to the Bible too.”
    As an agnostic, and having studied the bible extensively, and the Qur’an to a lesser degree, I can say that you are absolutely wrong. The New Testament Bible is by and large pacifist while the Qur’an is the how-to of smite thy enemies, abuse women, and abuse those you dominate. Even the Old Testament Bible doesn’t hold a candle to it. Muslims have to twist pretty hard to come up with “peaceful” out of Islam. Christians have to twist pretty hard to come up with “violence” from the New Testament.

  16. QE said: “Why is Adkisson just a guy who went crazy and killed a bunch of people, while Garbi/Lepine is the son of an wife-beating, child-beating, Algerian Muslim immigrant who grew up and killed a bunch of people? Why can’t he just be crazy too?”
    I’m sure he was, QE. Good ol’ Gamil Gharbi was -probably- just another standard-issue lone gunman loon. Maybe you can look that up for us eh?
    I’m thinking more along the lines of the wonderful guys who blew up a bunch of people in India yesterday. 45 killed, lots more wounded (which includes horrifically mangled, burned, limbs blown off, blinded, deafened and permanently scarred, don’t forget) by “An obscure Islamic militant group” according to the NZ Herald.
    Can you make that connection? Can you tell the difference between an act of mental illness and an act of war?

  17. get over it. God will still b e here, there and everywhere long after all the aholes have been buried and judged.

  18. “Even the Old Testament Bible doesn’t hold a candle to it.”
    Oh my friend… the Old Testament is a violent “record” of genocide, incest, and human sacrifice. Don’t go getting all high and mighty. Christians and Jews are just as loony as their Muslim cousins.
    To be sure… C&J looniness might be in remission right now in comparison to some Muslims who’s eyes are rolling about in their heads with religious zeal, but make no mistake… there are plenty of nutbar Jesus-freaks just a-waitin’ to kill for god.
    And Kate, I know that you’re desperate to turn this tragedy into yet another way to bash the centre and left, but face it… this guy is one of your own, probably weaned on rightwing blogs and forums to believe those evil liberals are out to give him the gay, or worse, universal healthcare.

  19. Greg:
    I think you’re incorrect here…Kate is making fun of Liberals who constantly seized upon those statements by GWB regarding the Islamic world “hating our freedom” and whatnot. Whether or not she actually believes that, I’m not sure.
    Personally I think it ranks up there as one of the stupidest statements GWB has made during his tenure as POTUS. It shows a complete and fundamental misunderstanding of the situation in the Middle East, and a misunderstanding of the grievances of those peoples. Now, I suppose you really could say they hate “freedom” in the sense that they would like society to adhere to a strict moral code, and many would prefer theocracies rather than democracies, but regardless, the statement made by GWB was completely daft.

  20. “What did you think would happen after characterizing progressives and liberals as you all do here?”
    Look at history Peter, socialists have killed more people than any other religion/ideology in history. Yes, an evil right wing man committed an act of political violence, but it is an exceptional situation. Most Right Wing speech is much more respectful of diverse political opinion than liberals and progressives. Your speech however Peter points toward censorship since you wrongly equate our hatred of liberal and progressive ideas with this crime. We are all allowed to express our contempt for the foolish.
    My prayers go out to the families of the dead.

  21. Not again. Leftard is such a fitting description.
    “Right after you point out to me where the billion-plus practitioners of Islam around the world, or even the half-million-plus practitioners of Islam in Canada, are all learning and planning to murder us.” – QE
    Exhibit A:
    “people who do not bleive god called Kafer in Islam and fight them” – Isam (12:32am)
    I wonder where this resident Muslim learned that?
    Could it be the Quran?
    Quran 9:123, where Allah says: ‘O ye who believe! Fight the infidels who are near to you, and let them find ruthlessness in you, and know that Allah is with the faithful.’
    Quran 9:29 “Fight those who believe not in God nor the last day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by God and His Apostle, nor acknowledge the religion of truth, (even if they are) of the people of the Book [Christians and Jews], until they pay the jizya [poll tax] with willing submission, feel themselves subdued.” (kill them unless they submit to either becoming Muslim or extortion)
    Quran 9:5 When the sacred months have passed away, THEN SLAY THE IDOLATERS WHEREVER YOU FIND THEM, AND TAKE THEM CAPTIVES AND BESIEGE THEM AND LIE IN WAIT FOR THEM IN EVERY AMBUSH, then if they repent and keep up prayer [become believers] and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them. (this verse abrogates 125 less violent verses)
    Plenty more where those came from. Oh, and then there’s the Sira and Hadiths (“Kill the Jews wherever you find them” – Mo).

  22. Don,
    “socialists have killed more people than any other religion/ideology in history”
    I think Islam takes that prize:
    “Jihad destroyed a Christian Middle East and a Christian North Africa. Soon it was the fate of the Persian Zoroastrian and the Hindu to be the victims of jihad. The history of political Islam is the destruction of Christianity in the Middle East, Egypt, Turkey and North Africa. Half of Christianity was lost. Before Islam, North Africa was the southern part of Europe (part of the Roman Empire). Around 60 million Christians were slaughtered during the jihadic conquest. Half of the glorious Hindu civilization was annihilated and 80 million Hindus killed. The first Western Buddhists were the Greeks descended from Alexander the Great’s army in what is now Afghanistan. Jihad destroyed all of Buddhism along the silk route. About 10 million Buddhists died. The conquest of Buddhism is the practical result of pacifism. Zoroastrianism was eliminated from Persia. The Jews became permanent dhimmis throughout Islam. In Africa over 120 million Christians and animists have died over the last 1400 years of jihad. Approximately 270 million nonbelievers died over the last 1400 years for the glory of political Islam. These are the Tears of Jihad which are not taught in any school.” — Jamie Glazov, 2007

  23. Irwin, the only people who share your particular characterization of Islam are actual terrorists.
    And if believing that twisted perversion of faith makes them a bunch of wacko fundamentalist nutjobs — and I think we can agree that they are — then what would that make you?

  24. “Irwin, the only people who share your particular characterization of Islam are actual terrorists.”
    Really?
    And perhaps these people, no?
    “Killing for religion is justified, say third of Muslim students”
    (telegraph.co.uk) A third of Muslim students in Britain believe killing someone in the name of religion is justified, a new poll claims.
    The survey found that extreme Islamist ideology has a profound influence on a significant minority of Muslims on campuses across the country.
    The findings will concern police chiefs, the security services and ministers, who are struggling with radicalisation among Muslim communities.
    The YouGov poll found:
    40 per cent support the introduction of sharia into British law for Muslims
    a third back the notion of a worldwide Islamic caliphate (state) based on sharia law
    40 per feel it is unacceptable for Muslim men and women to mix freely
    24 per cent do not think men and women are equal in the eyes of Allah
    a quarter have little or no respect for homosexuals.
    Although 53 per cent said that killing in the name of religion was never justified, compared with 94 per cent of non-Muslims, 32 per cent said that it was.
    ———-
    As for twisted “wacko fundamentalist nutjob” you’ve won the trophy prize. Take a bow.

  25. Heh, wonder if the young females being killed in Canada for trying to be too Canadian like, wearing cool clothes, date boys of your choice, go to after school events, get a part time job, like your friends do, wont marry your old uncle as promised by your family and etc…
    Just too damn bad DADDY slit your throat with your brothers help, while they were only obeying some obscure Islamic belief that no one other than a few crazies here and there hold to the letter of shiria law,
    Gee and others find this All so obscure like that?
    THEIR deaths are NOT reported on here in Canada, and or downplayed IF it breaks with that fact.

  26. Almost every single religion in Canada has been hyjacked by the left (yes the left also can be Christians or Catholic), churches across the land are being devided as the left force their socialist doctorine as the “Gospel” instead of following the word of God. At one time the Church was the mainstay of a community now these self same churches lament that they aren’t “Gay Friendly” enough, if a certain segment of the congregation don’t like what the bible teaches they just ignore that bit and embrace socliast ideology. Can anyone really say they’re surprised, devotely religious people find their faith being hyjacked by illiberal faux religious people to further erode our faith.
    I suspect this fella was a nut job, he had a criminal record for being violent didn’t he?

  27. irwin daisy:
    I’m not sure sure of your numbers to be honest. The worlds population at the start of the first crusades was only around 300 million people…to claim that 60 million died in north Africa, so essentially 20% of the world’s population was killed in North Africa alone. Problem is that by 1750, there was still only 100 million people in Africa by itself….and if you take the following numbers, you’ll again realize how silly what you’re saying is:
    270,000,000 / 1400 = 192,857 people killed every single year for the past 1400 years because they did not believe in Islam.
    Now, sure, there were some big wars back in the day. Armies of 50,000 were around during the crusades, and when the Caliphate became a leading power, they could field even more men than that, but you’re suggesting that 200,000 people were killed every year for being non-Muslim. Even if you account for Jihad’s and wars…that’s outrageous.
    Once you tally deaths due to Christianity, you get some similarly overwhelmingly large numbers, so I don’t think you’ve got a leg to stand on. One last fact as well: Africa hasn’t even had “120 million people” living there until the year 1900, so claiming that that many have died there seems large. But Africa being Africa, maybe not.

  28. Rose,
    I just found it somewhat amusing that you claim a socialist agenda was hijacking the gospels, when they were in fact a group of believers who lived community, where nothing was their own, but rather a resource for the community at large to partake of.
    Funny how hot tubs and big screen tv’s seem to be ignored in how they hijack Canada’s christian population in a far more profound way than homosexuality. Perhaps that’s why Jesus never addressed the issue homosexuality, but rather stressed numerous times that wealth can be one of the greatest obstructions to salvation.

  29. So what is wrong with hot tubs and big screen TVs?
    Jesus never said one should aspire to be poor or dependent on government welfare.

  30. Irwin Daisy: “A third of Muslim students in Britain believe killing someone in the name of religion is justified, a new poll claims.”
    Why would you take the Telegraph’s report at face value? Don’t you know that the MSM is full of spin and incompetence, Irwin?
    Here’s what the YouGov poll actually found when it asked whether it’s ever justifiable to kill in the name of religion:
    – Yes in order to preserve and promote that religion (note the double-barreled question — why if you support killing for self-preservation but not self-promotion?): 4%
    – Yes but only if that religion is under attack: 28%
    – No, it’s never justifiable: 53%
    Now, given the current state of interfaith relations in the West (and the fact that people like you actually insist and desire upon a full-fledged war by the West against Islam), I think the defensive responses of that middle 28% are rather understandable.
    In fact, then, only 4% of Muslim kids believe killing to preserve and promote their religion is justified, not the ‘one-third’ reported in the new. And of that 4%, the vast majority were Sunni, which is interesting, because given their current minority power status in Iraq, they may very well believe that the very existence of their religion is under threat.
    Anyway, the rest of the survey is available for your scrutiny online. The results are not nearly as sensational as you (or the Telegraph) would have everyone believe.
    E.g., A question not reported was “Do you believe that men and women SHOULD be treated equally.” Results: 89% Yes, 5% No, 6% Not sure. In other words, the ‘24% not equal in the eyes of Allah’ you cited refers to the students’ intellectual opinion of their religion, not their personal beliefs about male-female equality.

  31. Irwin is liar do not answer him. He never used relaity movies or say any thing real, but he may be close to get mentaly ill check up and he miss his check up recently. do not trust his any research tactic he is only simple ignorant
    hate Muslim
    we have to warn all Muslim mosque be aware of the person like Irwin never come to 10 meter close to any mosque he may do strange thing or harm muslim or damge mosque
    I can imgine Irwin in night shift drop stone to all mosque in Canada he hate Muslim so badly
    I can not believe this guy even exist
    or what relgion he blongs defintly he is not belive any god

  32. barjebus,
    I quoted Jamie Glazov: Glazov holds a Ph.D. in History from York University in Canada. He is specialized in Soviet Studies, and U.S. and Canadian foreign policy. He’s also a published historical writer.
    He’s one of many historians who quotes the same numbers.
    I think the multiple personality disorder referring to himself collectively as Isam, haye, and now Ishaq, is the real deal. Notice the typical Islamic response used on anybody confronting their belief -“he may be close to get mentaly ill check up and he miss his check up…”
    Classic.
    BTW, Ishaq, I don’t hate Muslims. I feel sorry for them, due to their bondage to a horrifying ideology.

  33. Quote: but rather stressed numerous times that wealth can be one of the greatest obstructions to salvation.
    Posted by: barjebus at July 29, 2008 6:25 PM
    LOL barjebus, get real I have a hot tub because my husband was wounded serving his country what exactly does that have to do with “Socialist” hyjacking our Churches to preach the gospel of Communism? Jesus wasn’t a commie, but the socialist sure are. As our elderly and families walk away from organized religion in absolute horror who is going to fill the pews? Socialist that attend Church five times a year for face time or to get elected, religion isn’t a drive through window Dear but somehow the left have made it appear that it is.
    If Christianity and Catholism want to survive they have to cut the socialist cancer out of their religion, or they’ll become one of those off shoot fake religous organizations that Preach the Gospel according to “Marx”, cause that’s what’s happening in Canada currently.

  34. John: “Oh my friend… the Old Testament is a violent “record” of genocide, incest, and human sacrifice. Don’t go getting all high and mighty. Christians and Jews are just as loony as their Muslim cousins.”
    Christianity is based on the New Testament Bible, a largely pacifist document; you either know very little about what it contains … or choose to ignore the fact. Do you have any stats indicating what the body-count is for Christians killing for Jesus?

  35. Rose,
    The video presents an excellent example of Muslim debating skills.
    Or as Churchill said, “What hydrophobia is to dogs, Islam is to man.”

  36. Thanks Rose, very telling, and did it not play out like many a discussion here?
    Live trolling caught on Vid! Excellent.
    Pleased me to see them arrested for their unprovoked attack just because they can’t handle their own feelings. Poor hapless feeble minded females.
    Not sure I wouldn’t have shown such restraint.
    Loved the part where he stated “religion of peace folks… piece of you here, piece of you there…”
    Clear, Succinct and True.
    So where are the lefties now?
    Not HERE defending these poor muslim “victims” tonight?
    ~ cue the crickets

  37. Hi, this is Lance.
    Being, you know, not Kate, and having the keys while she’s away, I’ve decided to edit the following for purely readability reasons. Personally, I’m rather sick of “Isam” only because figuring the comment out is bloody annoying.
    Edited version follows, my edits appear in ().

    this (There) is culture of abuse and hate in North America :
    people who enjoy some one get abuse like today comments of let otehr woman are also abuser too
    Those horrrr!y holly woman who enjoy watching other woman suffer they also live with abuser and love abuse others and made them frustrated

    Nope, had enough. That second paragraph would have taken me a year or so of Islamic study to figure out. No time.
    Isam, if you repeat this kind of crap I’ll delete your comment without prejudice. Capish? Kate might enjoy your scrawling, but I’ve no tolerance.
    Capish?
    Cheers,
    lance

  38. QE,
    You can’t help but publicly devolve your already idiot brain can you?
    “(and the fact that people like you actually insist and desire upon a full-fledged war by the West against Islam), I think the defensive responses of that middle 28% are rather understandable.”
    “the FACT”? Where did I say this?
    And then based on this “fact” you build the rest of your dim-witted assertion?
    Though it’s redundant to point out – you are a fool.

  39. Rose,
    “LOL barjebus, get real I have a hot tub because my husband was wounded serving his country what exactly does that have to do with “Socialist” hyjacking our Churches to preach the gospel of Communism? Jesus wasn’t a commie, but the socialist sure are. As our elderly and families walk away from organized religion in absolute horror who is going to fill the pews? Socialist that attend Church five times a year for face time or to get elected, religion isn’t a drive through window Dear but somehow the left have made it appear that it is.
    If Christianity and Catholism want to survive they have to cut the socialist cancer out of their religion, or they’ll become one of those off shoot fake religous organizations that Preach the Gospel according to “Marx”, cause that’s what’s happening in Canada currently.”
    What I’m getting at Rose is that your reason for living is not to simply _have_ faith, but rather to live a life emulating Jesus, no? Wealth becomes a detriment to that because I’d far rather play video games, watch movies, and live in a wealthy western society, maybe doing some charity work here and there rather than going somewhere to truly make a difference in peoples lives. Homosexuality isn’t keeping anyone from helping the needy; wealth is. I’m not saying wealth is evil, I’m just pointing out that I find it humorous to rant about homosexuals and socialists when in fact, there are much deeper and more pressing issues facing the church.
    Filling the pews? What does that have to do with anything? Did the gospel ever say, “go forth and fill the pews”? Most church organizations are a joke, merely pandering to our desire for feeling self-righteous.
    As to communism and Jesus, please explain to me then the actions of the early church in Acts? They shared everything, lived together, broke bread together, as a community…living communally….in a _communist_ manner. I’m not saying that the bible specifically advocates communism, but rather that communism did wonders for the early church. By sharing their possessions they not only escaped the trappings of wealth that the gospel warns about, but also displayed a profound love for their fellow man to include anyone and everyone in their community.

  40. Er… bad news guys. Buddy suckled at the teat of rightwing media. If he lived in Canada… he probably would have come here.
    Why do you guys support terrorism?

  41. “If Christianity and Catholism want to survive they have to cut the socialist cancer out of their religion”
    Are you guys reading the same bible? That Jesus guy was pretty much the biggest commie who ever walked on water.
    How is it conservatives can ignore all the “a rich man can no longer enter heaven than a camel can pass through the eye of a needle” stuff?
    Oh that’s right… he must have been speaking in metaphor. Funny how nothing is a metaphor until it’s something that’s really obvious and clear that you don’t like.

  42. Agent Smith: “Peter D – can you say ‘Sweeping Generalization’?
    One crackpot and everyone (in the leftosphere) will say ‘look I told you the right was crazy…’ ”
    Is it too much to hope that this was an elaborate meta-meta-joke of some sort?

Navigation