Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
I know I can’t provide link but I remember reading something on LGF once where an environmentalist made some kind of a wacky 6 month prediction. Something about the world ending or we’re all gong to die. That was probably a year or two ago. My how time flies.
Does anyone seriously believe that the earth will not have another ice age?
I think he missed the one about sailing off the edge of the earth because it’s flat. Oh wait.I forgot that AGW caused the earth to puff out into a sphere like rising dough. Silly me.
I especially like the Einstein one: “There is not the slightest indication that nuclear energy will ever be obtainable. It would mean that the atom would have to be shattered at will.” Eight years later, Einstein wrote his now historic letter to Pres. Roosevelt warning about the German atomic energy program. That letter of course caused Roosevelt to order the starting of the Manhattan Project.
This from Icecap today:
http://icecap.us/index.php
The ice caps hold a special place in the cold hearts of the global warming advocates who are all too quick to insist that our ice caps are currently melting at an unprecedented rate. We suspect that they will not be particularly thrilled to learn that a paper has just appeared in Geophysical Research Letters entitled “A doubling in snow accumulation in the western Antarctic Peninsula since 1850.”
Further:
We have covered Antarctica many times in past essays, and despite literally thousands of websites claiming that some calamity is occurring in Antarctica related to global warming, we side with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in this matter. Magazine covers have wonderful pictures of melting of the Antarctic, but IPCC in their 2007 report clearly states “Antarctic sea ice extent continues to show inter-annual variability and localized changes but no statistically significant average trends, consistent with the lack of warming reflected in atmospheric temperatures averaged across the region” (in fact, Antarctic sea ice extent has recently set record highs for both total areal extent as well as total extent anomaly (see here and here)). Furthermore, IPCC tells the world (and we wonder if anyone is listening) “Current global model studies project that the Antarctic ice sheet will remain too cold for widespread surface melting and is expected to gain in mass due to increased snowfall.”
—-
It appears even the IPCC can sometimes get it right- even if they do come to john-cross-style conclusions, ie, Wrong conclusions, most of the time.
More, or less hurricanes due to AGW. Not really sure. Maybe we should ask the Goracle?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080123/ap_on_sc/hurricanes_warming_3;_ylt=AgVFShIAvkkJibRiVaFyhgn0kPUI
scientists predict an extrodinarily high number of hurricanes with increased intensity in2007 due to GW….Southeastern states experience extreme drought in 2007 due to GW….Major factor causing this drought was the almost unpresidented low level of hurricanes last year which carry significant amounts of moisture into the area. They seem to “want their cake and eat it to”. Might I suggest it appears to be “upside down cake”.
Commenting has been closed, but there’s a great discussion that went on there.
There’s a few more here:
http://listverse.com/history/top-30-failed-technology-predictions/
Also, growing into the 1960s I recall some predictions that were made about life in year 2000 (that seemed so far away then):
– we’d have a Moon base and landed on Mars & Venus and possibly beyond
– space travel would be routine for anyone
– flying cars
– we’d work only 15-20 hours a week (funny, if anything we work even more!)
– house full of robots to do all the chores
– nuclear fusion realized
– cure for cancer found
Meanwhile the crystal balls missed on some amazing stuff, e.g. the internet
Well, to err is human.
Kate & co, you have GOT to read this article. It’s an interview of Philip Pullman, author, proselytizing atheist, and now apparently global warming authority:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml;jsessionid=DRN0LIM204H2NQFIQMFSFFWAVCBQ0IV0?xml=/earth/2008/01/19/eapullman119.xml&page=1
Some choice quotes:
“If the polar bears leapt from the pages of my fiction into reality and saw what was happening, they’d eat us. Eat as many of us as quickly as they possibly could. And good luck to them.”
“One less drastic solution we hear talk of is a tradable carbon ration. If you have unused credit, you can sell to somebody else. I think that’s wrong. We should have a fixed limit and that’s it. This is a crisis as big as war and you couldn’t trade your ration book in the wartime. You were allowed three ounces of butter a week, or whatever, and that was it. And this is what it should be like with carbon. None of this carbon trading. We should have a fixed limit and if you use it all up in October, then tough, you shiver for the rest of the year.”
Can’t you just feel the love of the dedicated liberal for his fellow man?
this morning the Herald had a story that the Giants Causway was about to be destroyed by global warming, 65 million year old basalt? I say nay nay, it been iced , watered , buried, uncovered many, many, many times before.
at least the AGW stories have dropped to about 1 per day.
Goes to show that people who pass the time talking about what they think will happen should really be spending more time observing and trying to understand what is actually happening……
Posted by: OMMAG at January 23, 2008 4:37 PM
“…should really be spending more time observing and trying to understand what is actually happening……”
No, because that would be science. Since the science is settled that is not really necessary.