 |
But nice try. Give the enviro-left credit – they start the hypocrisy training early. They even have a little logo! |
– Liz McDowell (Vancouver, BC)
– Azra Shivja (Markham, ON)
– Robert Hamon (Montreal, QC)
– Sasha Pippenger (Vancouver, BC)
– Joanna Dafoe (Toronto, ON)
– Olivier James Lavoie (Montreal, QC)
– Katrina Genuis (Sherwood Park, AB)
– May Jeong (Toronto, ON)
– Claire Stockwell (Montreal, QC)
– Rosa Kouri (Saskatoon,SK)
– PJ Partington (Toronto, ON)
– Nicolas Nadeau (Hanwell, NB)
– Hannah McKinnon (Deloraine, MB)
– Courtney Price (Toronto, ON)
– Lise Richard (Antigonish, NS)
– Adam Scott (Guelph, ON)
– Laura Zizzo (Toronto, ON)
– Marley Parker (Halifax, NS)
– Aiden Abram (Guelph, ON)
– Jeff Beyer (Ottawa, ON)
– Jessica Wishart (Halifax, NS)
– Trevor Bennett (Guelph, ON)
– Genevieve Gilbert (Ottawa, ON)
– Josh Darrach (Charlottetown, PE)
– Jennie McDowell (Guelph, ON)
– Adriana Hoogenboom (Ottawa, ON)
– Adam MacIsaac (St. Peters Bay, PE)
– David Noble (Guelph,
– Micah Melnyk (Ottawa, ON)
– Johnathon Constantine (Conception Bay S, NL)
– Derek Pieper (Guelph, ON)
– Catherine Gauthier (Montreal, QC)
That’s right – there are thirty-two names. All members of a “youth delegation” that flew to Bali to demand a meeting with John Baird to discuss their earth inheritance.
Six of these motivated young “heroes” are from Guelph (about 6 hours from Ottawa by minivan), including David Noble, whose “consulting company” 2degreesC, is credited with allowing all 32 to travel “carbon neutral”. Click on the link if you wish – but there’s not much there.
Apparently, his principled objection to Canadian environmental policy fell just short of preventing the carbon neutral Mr. Noble from going taxpayer funding neutral – he secured contracts worth nearly $50,000 from Natural Resources Canada in 2007, for 15 weeks of work.
That’s nothing- watch how many government flunkies jet off to Cannes for a ‘conference’,( which co-incides with the film festival).
Kate,
Four are from OTTAWA.
A .1 to .5 hour bus ride (or a healthy walk) to Baird’s office.
Help me out here.
10,000 people, most from North America and Europe, travel to a destination about as far away from those places as it is possible to get, to whine about CO2 emmissions. Do I have it right?
Part two. I know this is crazy talk and all, but why would 32 Canadians travel half way across the globe to talk to a minister, when all they have to do is head to Ottawa? Would that not be a tad more eco-friendly? Especially the four from Ottawa. I mean all they had to do was hop a bus.
They flew to the far side of the globe to meet with a man who lives in their own country? Yeah, that makes sense — after all, their carbon credits magically made all that jet pollution vanish into thin air.
A taxfunded vacation, cant say Ive had one of those since I had a summer job in Manitoba 34 years ago. the skeeters in Manitoba where bigger than the birds on the Bali beach.
They’re young. Too ignorant to know how badly they’ve been duped.
It’s time to jog terence’s links out there again:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOLkze-9GcI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN06JSi-SW8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCXDISLXTaY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpQQGFZHSno
The ones to Professor Bob Carter’s lecture.
I would go so far as to say that if ANY Canadian school board wants to allow teachers to show “An Inconvenient Truth” to students (or has already shown it, or bused students off to see Gore speak), they should be compelled to show the students that short series, also.
This one, too:
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=7819184350661384634
(Google Video: “Michael Crichton – Fear, Complexity, and Environmental Management in the 21ST Century”)
“Global Warming” or “Climate Change” do not exist, at least not as some sort of formally recognized human-induced kind of thing. The Earth warms up, the Earth cools down… one can leave it at that.
Sorry, John Cross, but you’re just plain wrong; no, I won’t discuss it with you over a leisurely latte, I’m not a scientist… but I’m able to read and think, listen and understand. I can’t tear down and rebuild an automobile engine like a team of A.J. Foyt’s mechanics, but I can understand they are TRULY experts in their field, if ya know what I mean.
Holy carbon credits! Lets hope the moonbats pick up a little of that old speciality, Bali Belly. I bet the birthrate will rise greatly among those kiddies after the usual time. Tee Hee!
Here’s the bio on David Nobel.
http://www.iisd.org/about/staffbio.aspx?id=812
Looks like he has no thoughts about setting up a ‘consultancy’ business while sucking on the ‘ol government tete.
Nothing like risk free ventures that one can incubate with other peoples’ money.
Stop for a minute, and imagine how many of these people are out there in the civil service, building bureaucracies, managing empires, and producing meaningless make work reports.
Does the liberal gravy train never end? I guess these are the kinds of junkets we’re going to have to get used to, with a thoroughly brainwashed younger generation, unless PM Stephen Harper and the CPC get a majority.
The magical thinking never ends. If I think it, it is.
‘No empirical proof needed, no need for discussion. If I THINK Global Warming is the #1 crisis facing humanity, and that humans are largely to blame, full steam ahead, and “don’t confuse me with the facts.”
The carbon footprint these 32 are leaving behind is vastly bigger than I and my family will create in our combined lifetimes. ‘Last time I flew anywhere was 2004, my husband and I share a car, and we live in an apartment.
one can only imagine their parents Christmas letter.
Frank had his hernia operation after 50 weeks on the waitlist.
Emma was voted best parent of the school for making the school assembly gender neutral, the school assembly is now both mandatory and womandatory.
Little Emelda our oldest daughter now wears a hajib to school in sympathy for her sisters stuggles, she does not play soccer as they are banned but has opted for judo in order to create a controvery and news story.
But our greatest achiever this year is little Sasha ( who we named in tribute to PETs spawn)who along with 49 of his peers saved the planet with his taxpayer funded trip to Bali. There he met with Stephane Dion and did 50 “dat is not fair”chants in a row in protest that other canadians had to sit in the cold and not experience the crisis of the global warming in ernest in Bali.
PS, we will be away on Quadra Island for the rest of the winter on the David Suzuki”spread your own night soil” campaign.
http://ww w.liveleak.com/view?i=c4c_1197704529
Yep.
Global warming.
Strong enough to stop a locomotive.
One more thing: This whole Global Warming/Carbon Credit scam is a case of massive projection. The Goreacles, Sukookis, and galaxy of Hollywood and Music stars whose feet are way too big (h/t Fats Waller) feel guilty about their massive consumption of the world’s resources and decide that SOMETHING MUST BE DONE.
The SOMETHING, of course, is to dump on the rest of us, to demand that the rest of us scrimp and save on energy, while they pig out BUT pay carbon credits to THEIR companies. The end result is that they get increasingly richer as they continue to deplete the earth of its resources, while the rest of us get poorer and are made to feel guilty every time we turn on a light.
http://ww w.liveleak.com/view?i=c4c_1197704529
Yep.
Global warming.
What Southern Pacific needs to do instead of using that locomotive, is get the Gooficle and Dr. Fruitbats minions to do a bit of shovelling.
2 from Vancouver BC
1 from Sherwood Park Alberta
1 from Saskatoon Saskatchewan
1 from Deloraine Manitoba
and 16 from Ontario
it almost sounds like the Canadian Senate sent these folks
Nightmare, your link isn’t working
So this is handy…a list of Canada’s most deluded cultists.
Probabaly all either “useful idiots” or making a living from transnationalist progressive cons.
pete copy and paste. close the space between thw w’s.
I don’t know if kate would allow a hotlink.
Ya gotta wonder who paid for this.
Geez, I would have declared myself a member of the environmental cult & demanded a meeting with anyone if only someone else would have offered to pick up the tab.
Again, Kyotoism is a money laundering scam. It has nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with the climate. Nothing to do with warming/cooling; nothing to do with pollution. Nothing.
The Bali Conference made that very clear. Gone are the original rhetoric about ‘saving the world’ and the ‘indisputable science’. That’s gone. It’s gone not only because reputable science has come forward and debunked the propaganda of the IPCC. It’s gone because it had no validity right from the beginning. It began and remains, a scam.
The G77 nations (the so-called developing nations, which include China (already highly developed) and India) were very outspoken and clear in Bali.
They absolutely and totally refused to participate in any standards, in any controls, on CO2 emissions or pollution. NONE. They declared that they are industrializing, that they have the ‘right’ to industrialize [Note: yet another basic UN human right?]…and that this right means NO Standards. No controls on emissions or pollution.
The only nations required, according to them and the UN,to use controls, are the G8, the already industrialized nations. BUT, BUT – even this is of little interest.
The G77 nations aren’t really interested in controls. Anywhere. What they want is Money. Money, Money, Money. From the West. What they want is for the West to pay for the industrialization of the entire world.
In the 19th c, this action by the West, ie, industrializing non-industrial countries, was derided and viewed with contempt. Remember? It was called ‘colonization’. And, Big Corporations Taking Over. The fact that this was actually, the West, building railways, factories, cities, roads etc – heh – it was Evil, because it changed the Sacred Purity of the Native Natural Life.
Now – hmmm, these countries want to industrialize. Fine. But they still don’t want to pay for it. They want the West to continue to fund it. But – without any strings. The money mustn’t come as a loan. Nor as foreign investment.
No, the UN has come up with yet another UN Money Scam. This time, the money must come as Sin Money.
You make the West feel that they are guilty of an enormous Evil to the Planet. You come up with all kinds of Models Of Evil. Not actual facts. Models. And you use the Mob Tactic to drive the agenda. Young people and dumb people are both prey to Mob Tactics. So, the Mob Tactic is based on emotion, and the UN Mob Tactic was to set up an apocalpytic scenario, worse than any Jurassic Park or Incoming Asteroid. This time, caused by Man. Evil Man of the West. Only the West.
How to get out of this Basic Sin? Money. Money. Money. Pay money to the ‘developing nations’ so that they can industrialize. Not as loans. Not as foreign investment. Just hand it over.
But wait. These G77 refuse to be part of any controls on emissions and pollution. So, overall, the West will pay…to increase…global emissions and pollution. Hmmm. And the Mob and the UN are OK with this! They don’t insist on any controls in these non-western countries!
Result? Increased emissions and pollution in the planet. But, isn’t the UN and The Mob telling us that The West is Evil because it pollutes? Now, the UN and The Mob wants the West to pay the G77 to increase emissions and pollution?
Heck. I’m confused. I thought the UN and The Mob were all emotional about the planet. Heck; they aren’t. It’s all about money. Good old UN.
If this Bali Conference has done anything, it has exposed the lies and hypocrisy of the UN and Its Mob. It’s not about the climate. It’s a money laundering scheme of the UN.
Strange that you took no issue with executives from EnCana Corporation, Iogen Corp, and PlascoEnergy Group–the last two are based in Ottawa–joining the official Canadian delegation. Were they traveling on the taxpayers’ dime? Not so interested in answering that question, I imagine.
Strange that you took no issue with executives from EnCana Corporation, Iogen Corp, and PlascoEnergy Group–the last two are based in Ottawa–joining the official Canadian delegation. Were they traveling on the taxpayers’ dime? Not so interested in answering that question, I imagine.
Personally I find it disturbing that ANYONE is paying attention to these enviro nhilists, but as long as we are I think the government can bring whoever it pleases. After all they (the government) were elected by a plurality of the Canadian population to represent us at home and abroad.
The fact that you don’t like the approach of the government is tough cookies.
Ok, baby steps for Orton.
EnCana, Iogen and PascoEnergy did not travel half way across the planet to have a meeting with the Minister. They took part because what happened in Bali had a very real possibilty of affecting them directly. It is called good business sense.
Your last question is a good one. Did they go on their own or the taxpayer’s dime. Let us know will you?
“The youth have also questioned why they were excluded from the official Canadian government delegation.”
Could it be because the government was elected, and they were not?
Kate: All members of a “youth delegation” that flew to Bali to demand a meeting with John Baird to discuss their earth inheritance.
And they had actually managed to secure that meeting–except that Baird walked out early, before he was scheduled to speak and answered questions from the youth delegates. Ahh, accountable and accessible government, CPC-style!
Six of these motivated young “heroes” are from Guelph (about 6 hours from Ottawa by minivan)
The implication being that they could just as easily met with Baird back home.
Except that (a) that wasn’t the only point of going to Bali, and (b) you are (again) mistaking reducing one’s carbon output (including going carbon neutral where appropriate and as much as possible) with reducing one’s carbon output to zero.
he secured contracts worth nearly $50,000 from Natural Resources Canada in 2007, for 15 weeks of work.
But those contracts were to conduct work for NRC. So the government–under CPC watch–paid a consultant to do some work for them. Big deal. If you’re implying that the NRC contracts helped pay for the CYD’s carbon neutral commitment, some actual evidence would be nice.
And are you saying that if a government office were ever to call you up and hired your commercial artist services, you’d turn them down on principle?
18 – 25 year olds are “youths”!! So when do these “youths” grow up? I am presuming this organization is somehow funded directly and/or indirectly via tax dollars — what a bunch of pathetic parasites.
I’d be far more likely to agree that GW is a crisis when those who insist it is a crisis start acting like it’s a crisis.
In the meantime, I remain appalled, but not surprised, by their hypocrisy.
one can only imagine their parents Christmas letter
Hello Muddah, hello faddah, here I am at …[damn, no way to make this rhyme…]
been around the block: Show biz global warm-mongers: the shame of unearned income eh? Or maybe more accurately, income FELT to be unearned.
Jim: EnCana, Iogen and PascoEnergy did not travel half way across the planet to have a meeting with the Minister. They took part because what happened in Bali had a very real possibilty of affecting them directly. It is called good business sense.
First, they went not as representatives of the business/industry sector as a whole, but as representatives of their own private investors and shareholders. Remember: they didn’t just decide to attend out of “good business sense.” They were invited by the Goverment as part of the official delegation.
Which raises the question: Why these three? If this was about sector-wide representation, why not send an industry-wide association?
Second, environmental and youth groups have as legitimate a claim to be at the table as industry, since the outcomes of Bali will impact both their work and their lives. Why did they have to pay their own way, which denies them access to higher level meetings that the energy sector executives had access to?
Also, that David Noble received $50,000 from NRC seems to be a sticking point around here. Does it bother anyone that Iogen was received $7.7-million and Plasco $6.5-million from the federal government?
Or that Plasco’s CEO is Rod Bryden, former owner of the Ottawa Senators of the National Hockey League. Think he might have some personal connections with Ottawa gatekeepers? Power begets power, I guess.
orton park – I haven’t heard or read Kate as an activist for the AGW cause. Have you?
That’s why it’s hypocritical of these people to be activists for a cause, and yet, rather than going to Ottawa, a ‘carbon-lite trip’ to present a petition or meet with the Ministry, they chose to spend our tax dollars on a ‘carbon-heavy trip’. what was the ‘other point’ of going to Bali? To protest? And we, the planet-users, must pay for their ‘carbon-heavy trip’ to do that?
This makes one suspect their agenda, when their actions contradict their rhetoric.
Zip: After all they (the government) were elected by a plurality of the Canadian population to represent us at home and abroad.
A plurality, indeed. Which means a diversity of opinions and viewpoints.
Three private businesses were part of the delegation. Three spots. Could have just as easily been one representative from the private sector, one from the environmental NGO sector, and one for the youth sector. That would have reflected the Canadian plurality, Zip. Three business executives and zero critical voices sounds more like partisanship to me.
ET said:
“Again, Kyotoism is a money laundering scam”
Yes, at one level of the transnational revenue feeding pool…however, at the upper levels of transnational globalism (centered in UN regulatory bodies)it represents a form of unheralded power monopolization.
One of the former IPCC scientists put it more succinctly by stating it is a power grab by globalists working through the UN to, essentially, tax/regulate/control one of the building blocks of life on this planet… CO2.
His contention was if you control CO2 production and use you control life itself and the implications of the politics and bureaucratic malfeasance inherent vulnerability for abuse in that premise was too great to concentrate so much power in a single globalist body of unelected/unaccountable men.
This was the reason he gave for his call to disband the UN-IPCC and abandon UN centered/dictated transnational sustainability politics fro nation-state working groups…he saw “Kyotoism” as the greatest loss of individual and national sovereignty ever undertaken in human history…I tend to agree.
Orton Park – I’m not the one preaching that the world is coming to an end because of the lifestyles of greedy western consumerism. Nor, do I believe, are Encana or any of the other business entities you name.
These sanctimonious little twits are, and they choose to do so by flying half way around the globe to a resort island and pushing themselves in front of any camera they can find.
That’s the difference.
And you can stick your carbon neutrality where the sun don’t shine. Such a thing doesn’t exist. You either create excess CO2 or you don’t. You don’t get to pretend that paying indulgences to a scam enterprise absolves you of that pile of reeking climate change hypocrisy – not around here, anyway.
“The implication being that they could just as easily met with Baird back home.”
Thats the entire point Sophist!
Fick, you Earth commies are slow witted
When they (Gore, Suzuki, etc) start walking, paddling, peddling and flapping to get from point A to point B, then I may start listening. When they start moving out of their “Big Footprint” mansions into Caves and Huts, then I may start listening. Until then, the hypocrites will continue to blow hot air and I will continue to not listen.
Daniel
Richard Ball: Could it be because the government was elected, and they were not?
Were the executives at Encana, Iogen, and PlascoEnergy also elected? They formed part of the official Canadian delegation, after all.
********
ET: what was the ‘other point’ of going to Bali? To protest?
Actually, yes. This is a global event with global impacts for everyone, including youth. They have as much democratic right to have their voice heard and attempt to shape the outputs/outcomes of the conference as anyone else.
If simply submitting a petition was their own objective, then yes, doing so in Ottawa would have made more sense than in Bali. But they had other objectives, including trying to shape the course of a global consensus that has broad and lasting implications. Insofar as this issue is global in scope, and insofar as addressing this issue (through negotiation or protest) requires face-to-face meetings/confrontations from people all over the world–which by definition necessitates travel to a specific geographic location–I, as a fellow “planet-user,” entirely support their right to protest.
when their actions contradict their rhetoric.
Only if you think their rhetoric implied trying to reduce one’s carbon output to zero. Which would be wrong.
I read all these doom and gloom forcasts of what is going to happen if we in the Canada dont lower our CO2 emmissions.I have read Kyoto and am following Bali and there is NO WHERE in either meeting where there is a reduction in CO2 emmissions for the planet,in fact CO2 emmissions will rise considerably under kyoto targets.If we follow kyoto,and believe all the hype about global warming and CO2 causing it, there will be HIGHER temps and MORE melting under kyoto than without it as the shift in production to the G77 countries to satisfy a growing world population will be in countries with NO CO2 controls.
Er, shouldn’t some of the little darlins’ be at home writing exams? ‘Tis the season, after all.
“18 – 25 year olds are “youths”!! So when do these “youths” grow up?”
We keep youn adults pretty sheltered an irresponsible these days In my parents Generation people in this age group were parents with careers/business ventures.
Idle recusant academic culture has filled the voids of these idlers with emotional “activism”… and pop culture politics are mostly half baked childish reasoning/naivety which has made a generation of unfulfilled vacuous young adults with child-like notions and utopian idealism…”youths” is appropriate when we see childish actions and thinking.
`I just read on Canada.com that Canada and the USA
had caved in on the “Bali roadmap”. I wonder what kind of warped thinking that reporter had. Even the BBC had a more accurate story.
Perhaps all these misguided young folks are doing the scribbling for the reporters???
WL Mackenzie Redux: Thats the entire point Sophist!
Read on, WLMR. Meeting with Baird wasn’t the only point of the CYD going to Bali. If it were, then Kate’s implication might have more merit. But it isn’t, so hers doesn’t.
The most knowledgeable person on the subject of ‘climate change’, from Guelph is Dr.Ross McItrick, Prof. of Economics, Guelph University. Those ‘youth’ from Guelph who attended Bali, should have instead attended some of the Professors lectures and learned from one of the worlds foremost experts, the folly of “climate change”. They need not have travelled several thousand Km but instead a short walk down the street in Guelph. Ir was Prof. McKittrick, who as a “Peer Reviewer” of the IPCC, who examined in detail the temperature data used by IPCC and found that it was severely flawed, of course in favor of the alarmist IPCC. Some corrections were made but many errors still remain. This caused the Professor to leave the IPCC organization. Yesterday in the National Post, Pro. McKittrick join over a hundred imminent world scientists as a co-signatory to a letter to the Mr. Ban Ki- Moon, Secretary General of the United Nations, impressing upon him that the UN climate conference is taking the world in entirely the wrong direction, and that it is not possible to stop climate change. It is necessary reading for all who wish to understand more fully the folly of the IPCC’s ridiculously flawed campaign to spend billions of dollars in a supposed scheme to stop climate change; when in fact the world’s climate always has been changing and always will be changing and that the world community cannot halt the phenomena let alone cause a reversal. “We should give up futile attempts to combat climate change”.
OK OK I’ll switch lightbulbs and ride my bike to town a couple of times a month.
How long am I going to hear about global warming?
The rest of my life?
I can’t even talk about this with people around me, they think I’m some sort of monster for even questioning it.
Anyone have advice? I find this all very disturbing.
Joe B. thanks for the links on Bob Carter.
Highly recommended!
Those little f@#$%ers can fly half way around the planet, so that they can whine like the good little leftards that they are, and yet their idiot parents give me dirty looks for using my snowblower? Or my craftsman lawnmower? Or my 16′ ski-boat?
And, yes moonbat, it is all about leading by example. If I tell my kids not to drink, then open a quart and proceed to get drunk in front of them, I should not be to surprised if any one of them develop a drinking problem.
Same s@#$ for the idiots whom you adore. The day they walk their talk, is the day I MIGHT trade in my 2 stroke for a 4 stroke. MIGHT!
“Meeting with Baird wasn’t the only point of the CYD going to Bali.”
Seing how Kyoto scince has been thorougly debunked by legitimate scientific peer review ..and that CO2 hear mongering is now an obviously false/dihonest construct, there was no real reason for a Bali run IMHO. ( I bet this list was 10 times bigger untiol the Taxpayer funding fell through)
CO2-AGW catastrophe is a scientifically debunked theory.
So what was the purpose of the Bali schmooze ‘n Tan?
Looking at the List provided I’d say its a practice run for easter break in Fla….the confront Baird BS was an excuse to make it fit the criteria for fed funding(until this dropped through)
A cluster of sactimonious little partisan University snits flapping their arms over a dead climate theory on tropical pacific beaches while Tax paying Canada struggles to pay the bills under an arctic deep freeze, just has a massive stench of hypocracy and irresponsible dalliance to it. IMHO
My cynicism seldom steers me wrong 😉
Kate: I’m not the one preaching that the world is coming to an end because of the lifestyles of greedy western consumerism.
Again, start with a false premise (see also “‘Carbon neutrality’ means staying home”), and everything that follows is wrong.
Such a thing doesn’t exist. You either create excess CO2 or you don’t.
Actually, the thing that doesn’t really exist is this false duality between “excess” and “essential/non-excess” CO2. The CO2 that you produce is the CO2 that you produce. You can’t divide it into essential and excess portions. But you can reduce its impact by first reducing total output where you can, and then pay the true costs for the remaining output that arises from activities that you deem necessary and important.
You don’t get to pretend that paying indulgences to a scam enterprise absolves you of that pile of reeking climate change hypocrisy – not around here, anyway.
The point of “carbon neutrality” for the consumer is to pay to a greater extent the full costs associated with one’s actions, that is, converting what has traditionally been treated as externalities back into internalities. Neither you nor I have ever once paid in our entire lives the full price of gasoline. You are taking shots at people who are doing voluntarily that which should be mandatory.
kingstonlad: yet their idiot parents give me dirty looks for using my snowblower? Or my craftsman lawnmower? Or my 16′ ski-boat?
Did you pay a few bucks extra to reflect the full costs of producing and using that snowblower or lawnmower or ski-boat? Because the CYD did for their flights, so if you didn’t, the kids are still one-up on you.
“OK OK I’ll switch lightbulbs and ride my bike to town a couple of times a month.”
Not me! I don’t intend to concede one single penny, habit, preference or action to fraudulent climate science or earth cult guilt politics.
Don’t ever propose to force me to it either….I have a couple decades supply of canned whup-ass just waiting to be opened on control freak pinkies.
Bob (Bob at December 15, 2007 12:22 PM).
Simply tell them that (A) “climate change” is not a new phenomena like the “global warmingists” would like us to believe; that it has been occuring for a million years or more, always has, always will be, and yes the rate of change does vary, and that we are powerless to change this very natural occurence. (B)Guess what color the fiords of Greenland were during a previous intergalcial period, (like the one that we are now in)?. Yup, you are right, GREEN. And (C) Why was that island named Greenland as opposed to “Whiteland”? Because of course it’s fiords
were green from the lush vegetation that was growing during that warm period, obviously warmer than it has been in the most recent cycle which may change any day,but unfortunately this cannot be forecasted with any precison. And was a good portion of the world flooded? Nope. Did much of the planets wildlife vannish? Nope.
All of our other weather forecasts are most unlikely to be inaccurate four days from now.
We dont know when the next cold weather cycle will occur similar to the one we had in the early seventies, but when it does happen, the IPCC and its millions of ‘global warmingist’ deciples, will drop out of sight for a while like those who were fear mongering just a few years ago about the doom and gloom that would occur if we did not become “Y2K compliant”.
notice the contracts he got are just pennies shy of $25k.
In government work, that’s how you help your friends because you don’t have to compete the work . . just give the contracts to whomever.
Just do it over and over . . . . simple corruption, simply done.