Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
NY Slimes is at a 52 week low today, almost hit $16.00 this morning. Gee, with the market rallying today, how can that be?
Wonder if the fact they’ve sold their credibility for a bag of magic beans has anything to do with it?
Would have made a nicehttp://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=6tnxemc&s=1“ rel=”nofollow nofollow nofollow nofollow”> short sale.
That rating of Sell is too ambiguous.
IMO – should be a rating of “Dump this turkey ASAP no matter what” …. that is an official rating in My Official Investment Rating system
But in the real world ….. the hedge /margin investors are happy to prolong the slide to oblivion as they’ll milk the cow till it drops dead.
Hey, maybe George Soros is waiting for the right fire sale price to make them an offer they can’t refuse. “Paper of record” or paper of any merit, the NYT’s hasn’t been for years. Their financial reporting is abysmal. They have the most boring hacks on the editorial page. Their international news has been upsurped by good blogs. Their culture/arts/society drivel is appreciated by only a few elitists with generally bad taste.
Pinch piddled away the only thing that really matters at the end of the day for a newspaper, quality content.
Morphed into an all out Soros’ Izvestia for America’s rabid lefty moonbats might give them a better niche, although that would probably drive the stock onto the OTC exchange.
They are dead, they just don’t know it yet.
That sell rating is all the more remarkable given the investment industries propensity to push stocks onto the public. The traditional ratio of buy to sell recomondations is something like 15 to 1, and when they have a stock they don’t like, they are most likely to place a hold or neutral rating rather than honestly call for a sell. Hence “sell” does indeed mean “Dump this turkey ASAP no matter what”.
I was on a plane a year ago with a guy in 1st class. He was a terrestrial radio guy – one of the big outfits that has one guy, a computer in an office, and a broadcast liscence in every major market in the country. We chatted it up for awhile, and soon he came to ask what I listen to. I said I like reggae, and had been an XM subscriber for the past year. I loved it I told him, because I prefer different music – of what I want – at different times. The fat tail and all.
He came back by saying the ‘Jack’ radio format is not a sustainable model, and that they’ll see a return of their core audience over the past year.
That is precisely the discussion you’ll get with people who don’t know what they are doing in the new media.
Don’t trust them with your investment dollars. If you need exposure to telecomm, media, broadcasting etc in your portfolio, chase the new, the hungry, and the smart.
These fossils are dead – they just don’t know it yet.
@Woodporter: One reason for that imbalance is intercompany-political; another is intercompany-political. An investment shop such as Banc of America putting out an explicit “sell” recommendation on a big company implies that:
a) B of A considers the stock to not offer good value;
b) It’s not likely that the New York Times will be sending any investment-banking (or other) business to B of A in the foreseeable future, and;
c) The N.Y. Times corporation lacks the cultural/political clout to get back at B of A for panning NYT stock (e.g., through convincing other companies to withdraw business from B of A and/or shunning it.)
When (a) applies but not (b) or (c), the typical investment shop encourages and looks with favour upon analysts who use the “switch” recommendation, with diplomatic niceties added in the rationale.
Where were you experts when I bought RBC stocks a few months ago?
Kate
buy lottery tickets:-)))))
@Kate:
Myself, I was minding my own business and not sticking my prosboscis into your doings. Life to me seems more civil that way (which, of course, puts me at odds with the elected honchos of most of the levels of government I have to watch out for.)
facts and less liberal opinion would go along way to keeping the print media alive for a few more years.
Dad gum wackos they thinks we birds came from reptiles what a load of popycock bull poo AND IM GOING TO GET VIOLENT WITH THESE CRACKED URNS IM GOING TO PICK THEIR EYES OUT SQUAWK SQUAWK