Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers

Sweetwater

Don't Run

Polar Bear Evolution

Email the Author
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood." - Michael E. Zilkowsky
“For a while their, Pinch Sulzberger understood this.”
Have I been trolled by pointing out this obvious error or is they’re an extra comma in there?
This is a common mistake, much like writing, “elephant’s” to express more than one of the animal.
Another goodie is we’re, were and where. If you carefully listen to Brits (speech impediment central) you can hear why there is some confusion.
Remember this?
Now this is good.Getting arrested while screaming at conservatives sometimes has consequences.
[link fixed – ED]
My link does work, so just go read gateway pundit.
What’s BDS?
BDS = Bush Deranged Syndrome
Bush Derangement Syndrome, as diagnosed by Dr. Charles Krauthammer, a psychiatrist who was born in Canada and later won a Pulitzer for commentary.
It comes from blaming everything on teh most famous Bush since that one Moses had
Liberals are always trlling us that apes are the next of kin of humans what a load of bull kaka and its as bad as those same cracked urns saying birds are glorified reptiles what a bunch of poppycock AND IM NOT REPTILE IM GOING TO GET VIOLENT WITH THOSE EVOLUTIONIST WACKOS IM GOING TO START PICKING THEIR EYES OUT SQUAWK SQUAWK
Ideology in the New York Times? You must be joking.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/27/opinion/27sat1.html?ref=opinion
Never mind that Rupert Murdoch, despite what you might have heard at the Starbucks, isn’t an ideological conservative, particularly. He’s a capitalist, and a successful one, especially since he’s chosen to work in the media, which offers a pretty spotty rate of return overall. He sees a niche, and he markets to it. Fox News might be percieved as conservative, but could you tell me just what the ideological bent of FoxTV or the movie studio is, particularly? Not exactly beacons of conservative thought, folks.
New York Slimes, carrying water for the Dems since Vietnam. Their slide into bankruptcy is far too slow.
The difference between the Kennedy administration and the Clinton administration (other than Oswald o’course) was the Internet. Kennedy’s many and varied indiscretions we heard about twenty years later, Clinton’s we heard about maybe that many days later.
In both cases the MSM sat on the stories and would STILL be sitting on them, its just that this guy Matt Drudge spilled the beans on Clinton and had the thing all to himself for four (4) entire days before the MSM outlets admitted they were sitting on it. I recall the NY Slimes was not among the first to report.
The Lesson? People tolerate propaganda when they have no choice (CBC!!!), but normally they won’t pay money for it.
A corollary to my post above is that so far nobody has reported -anything at all- about George Bush.
Eight years of digging and so far they’ve got nothing. Nada. Zilcho.
Given the legions of hate filled media Furies out there turning over every rock and poking a stick into every shite pile in the nation, I can only conclude the man is very nearly a saint. Otherwise somebody would have dropped a dime on him by now. Hell, they can’t even make stuff up about this guy. Dan Rather’s rather unemployed from that little effort.
Yet another reason NOT to pay money for MSM propaganda. They invent things.
On the brighter-yet side of this encouraging news about the Slimes, Drudge is reporting recent anti-Iraq War movies with big stars in them are doing almost direct to DVD.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071025/NATION/110250083/1002
“It doesn’t matter how many Oscar winners are in front of or behind the camera — audiences are proving to be conscientious objectors when it comes to this fall’s surge of antiwar and anti-Bush films.”
“Both “In the Valley of Elah” and, more recently, “Rendition” drew minuscule crowds upon their release, which doesn’t bode well for the ongoing stream of films critical of the Iraq war and the Bush administration’s wider war on terror.”
This is very good news my friends, and you did NOT read it in the NY Slimes. Nor will you.
“I rest my case! And a good thing too, it was getting pretty heavy.” Groucho Marx (Hey, if Lefties can quote Marx, so can I!)
I apologize for misspelling there. Now you know why I am homophone-phobic