24 Replies to “The Sad Saga Of Socks”

  1. My cat’s name is Lucy and I read the piece to her about sock. She is pissed. She wants either Huckabee or Guiliani.

  2. I have no use for people who treat a pet as a disposable item. I would say the same of anyone.

  3. What the heck, she kept Bill but got rid of the cat? Shows you how messed up she is, she should have booted Bill and kept the cat!

  4. Kate, sorry for the OT (but the reader tips thread is at 313 comments):
    Speaking of “tolerance” of the “progressive left”, commenter “chester” posted a rather innocuous comment on Red Tory alluding to Liberal misfortunes,
    and was called a child molester (and told to die of cancer) by the commenters. Far from suggesting it was over the line, Red Tory himself joined in with the “Chester the molester” comments.
    Today’s tolerant, progressive left here:
    http://tinyurl.com/32ropx

  5. That’s all the world needs: A menopausal woman with her finger on the button of nuclear weapons and one who doesn’t like animals.
    GOT HELP AMERICA!!!!!!!

  6. I’ve never been much for Liberals or the left but visiting Red Tory’s site leaves one feeling a mite soiled.

  7. Hitlery is so typical of the cold, calculating, a-moral, gender-neutral iceberg schemers that are drawn to the power of this level of politics. Hillary smells the power of the oval office again and the scent is so intoxicating she has rid herself of all personal ethics to attain it. The Cat story is indicative of a calculating manipulative personality that only mimics the humanitarian empathies of real people to gain trust and acceptance.
    Dumping a family “pet?” when it has served its useful purpose as an image prop is an indication of the lack of common human empathy in Hitlery’s make up…hell, look at Bill, he’s a “prop” for image purposes, you can’t tell me this marriage is for anything other than political image only ( probably why Chelsy is so frigged up..poor kid was an unloved image prop).
    Hitlery’s a chameleon of the first order…a political “Zelig”…when she has to be a southern church lady she dons the trappings and drawl to make appearances at black baptist meetings…when she has to be the slick urbane female exec she dons the trappings and makes aggressive speeches in a Manhattan drawl at prestigious NYC. LA. Chicago venues…when she has to be a mid-west small town house wife chatting up the girlfriends about marriage and kids over coffee and cheese rolls she gets into character and plays the roll.
    The cat incident is significant…it reveals the feigned empathy of a calculating political predator. Hillery should have been born with a fin on her back…the last place a profane, amoral power addicted personality like this needs to be is behind the switches of global power.

  8. Didn’t Hillarious write a book titled “It Takes A Village To Raise A Child? What “village” people raised her Chelsea bun?

  9. Clearly Hillary has the intellect that enables her to maintain a high profile position in American politics.
    Sadly she is no Margaret Thatcher ideologically, but rather a Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro or Taliban Jack Layton in her political soul.
    Hard socialist, well hidden.
    American voters should be well aware of the socialist traits of Hillary, lest they lose what they have and become like Canada, a quasi – free state, where the government has emerged as the total “Nanny” of its citizen’s life.
    As an aside, maybe Loreen Harper should take the initiative and adopt Hillary’s cast off “Socks”!

  10. There were extenuating circumstances to Socks’ untimely disposal. Socks and Buddy (a lab acquired in 1997) never got along. Bill said that it would be easier to broker a peace between Israelis and Palestinians than between Socks and Buddy.
    Given this, perhaps the Clintons had to make a choice between Socks and Buddy, and Socks was easier to find a taker for. Or perhaps they just liked Buddy better, a view that might find some support on SDA.
    But this raises a serious question about Hillary – why does she allow such insipid names for her pets?

  11. Re; “Socks”
    “But this raises a serious question about Hillary – why does she allow such insipid names for her pets?
    Posted by: rabbit at October 21, 2007 1:49 PM”
    They considered ‘Stocking’ but cooler heads prevailed…;)

  12. …i find this strangely suspicious that an anti-cat posting was uploaded when Kate was away at a doggie show.
    There is a hidden message in here somewhere.
    😉

Navigation